Peter_Rotten
01-08-2007, 01:43 PM
After much prompting and general nagging from the Adepts, the Mod staff has changed the Forum descriptions (as of today - 1/8/07). Incorporating much of the Adepts' suggestions, Zilla created these new descriptions:
Legacy Metagame Forum
For "competitive" decks: Decks which are optimized, thoroughly tested, played in a variety of metagames, and have proven themselves in a competitive tournament environment. A deck is not required to be Tier 1 to be included in the LMF.
Open Forum
For "finished" decks: Decks which are optimized and thoroughly tested. A deck is not required to have proven itself in a competitive tournament environment to be included in the Open Forum, but it is recommended. A thorough writeup including card choices, strategy, and matchup descriptions is required.
New and Developmental Forum
For "unfinished" decks: For new or relatively untested decks and ideas which require further development or optimization. Also for casual and budget decks. Once a developmental deck has been fully optimized, it can be moved to the Open Forum by a moderator. A writeup including card choices and basic strategy is required.
You may notice that such inclusions as Bw Braids, Sliver Control, and MUC in the Open forum are now very reasonable. One aspect of the new write-ups that I particularly like is the avoidance of qualifying decks as Great, Good, or Bad. One minor thing that we consistently struggle with on this site is the misconception that a deck in Open is a "better" deck than a deck in N&D. Hopefully these new write-ups help squelch that belief.
So, what do you think? Like 'em? Hate 'em? Don't care?
Legacy Metagame Forum
For "competitive" decks: Decks which are optimized, thoroughly tested, played in a variety of metagames, and have proven themselves in a competitive tournament environment. A deck is not required to be Tier 1 to be included in the LMF.
Open Forum
For "finished" decks: Decks which are optimized and thoroughly tested. A deck is not required to have proven itself in a competitive tournament environment to be included in the Open Forum, but it is recommended. A thorough writeup including card choices, strategy, and matchup descriptions is required.
New and Developmental Forum
For "unfinished" decks: For new or relatively untested decks and ideas which require further development or optimization. Also for casual and budget decks. Once a developmental deck has been fully optimized, it can be moved to the Open Forum by a moderator. A writeup including card choices and basic strategy is required.
You may notice that such inclusions as Bw Braids, Sliver Control, and MUC in the Open forum are now very reasonable. One aspect of the new write-ups that I particularly like is the avoidance of qualifying decks as Great, Good, or Bad. One minor thing that we consistently struggle with on this site is the misconception that a deck in Open is a "better" deck than a deck in N&D. Hopefully these new write-ups help squelch that belief.
So, what do you think? Like 'em? Hate 'em? Don't care?