ANT vs. TES? that's a new topic
Type: Posts; User: SaberTooth
ANT vs. TES? that's a new topic
what do you think about toxic deluge? seems more like an ANT card, but it could work
i think that your only way, if you want to win that turn is with diminishing returnss
bryant is the best tes pilot out there, i really enojoy watching him
i top4'ed yesterday in a 99 men tournament with the same 75 on the op -1 duress +1 cabal therapy maindeck. the list is a blast, and ill gotten gains won me 2 games, i won a candelabra of tawnos, so...
thank you!!
congrats bryant!!! anybody with links to the matches¿?
no wincon maindeck? strange
Good luck! i want to see you in the feature match area!
i think that if you play brainstorm, you need to play fetchlands
In the last BoM a doomsday was in 7 position i gues... but well.. for me tes and ant are better
i think that tes doesn't really need more removal (or creature hate in general), but im trying to put some DoN. there's a lot of maverick in my meta
i wanna try etw MD too... seems good. at first...
the idea of no win-cons MD seems good... with only 1 ad nauseam and no tendrils/etw, nauseam becomes A LOT better, at least in theory
?? fetchlands doesn't protect you. Only basics or more than 4 non-basic lands
Stormgasm!
about that list. i think that the only value on tendrils in sb is improve Ad nauseam, but with etw, it makes no sense. there's a lot of life lost in that list too... even more with...
Maybe you could cut 4 fetches to include 4 gemstone mines: 5 fetch, 4 duals, 4 gemstone. What do you think? i don't like a high amount of fechtlands with only 4 lands
i was thinking about DoN too... it's true that we can't kill teeg with ONLY 1 DoN (2 DoN can do it anyway) but we can at least bounce teeg easier than thalia. I think that the only problem with the...
if i'm on ad nauseam at low life, sometimes keep blue in the pool, because i can use cantrips instead of losing
this. the deck is about abuse ad nauseam, that's why tes runs 2. it's our best engine, and even when i kill myself (for example being at19 life turn 2 and PUM, dead) i love the card. if i play...
this. i think that the deck have all the protection needed, i mean, 8 spells to protect our victory MD are enough.
i think that if u cut the 4th mox, maybe an inquisition is better than the 4th duress
you're right. Thank you
Bryant, a question about your new side
That Thoughtseize it's because you're playing 1 ad nauseam instead of 2 so it's a little more safe now? why not another duress or inquisition?
how do you...
ye, you're right, but pyorclasm seems a little less situational, since u don't need petal.
i agree with past in flames, but, a couples days ago, past in flames gave me 2 matches, so now i see the...
i'll try again grapeshot in the side. i missed the card the other day against a teeg and elves, but pyroclasm did the work. sometimes i feel that grapeshot is an overkill, i mean you can kill teeg...