Search:

Type: Posts; User: Nihil Credo

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Replies
    2,664
    Views
    755,332

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    If the deck only runs 1-2 Worm Harvests, then the best choice is probably to still run the monster that is Tabernacle and if necessary get rid of it with Wasteland and/or Ghost Quarter and/or Glacial...
  2. Replies
    2,664
    Views
    755,332

    Re: [DTW] 43 Lands

    Gamble can usually do the job just as well, and grabs LftL (or whatever you need) as well.



    Control decks who can't recover (as fast) as you. I prefer Devastating Dreams, though.



    It's...
  3. Replies
    2,664
    Views
    755,332

    Re: [DTW] 43 Lands

    Oops, sorry, I confused it with Devastation.

    Yep, Ruination looks painful. Do Survival decks really pack it in your area?
  4. Replies
    2,664
    Views
    755,332

    Re: [DTW] 43 Lands

    While that's true, I tend to mulligan aggressively with this deck, because with Loam online you end up getting 2/3 cards a turn fairly soon. Also I consider Turn 1 Gamble->Manabond a viable play, if...
  5. Replies
    2,664
    Views
    755,332

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    I am fairly confident Assassin's nonland configuration is close to optimal; the numbers on the red spells may be tweaked, but not anything else. For reference:

    4 Manabond
    2 Exploration
    4 Gamble...
  6. Replies
    2,664
    Views
    755,332

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Is there any benefit in dropping red? The deck doesn't exactly fear Wasteland (as a minor note: ironically, the G/W version loses to Magus of the Moon outright whereas the 3c one doesn't), and at the...
Results 1 to 6 of 6