Search:

Type: Posts; User: leander?

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    2,664
    Views
    756,788

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Even against EtW it's way too slow (unless you've got a Loam and a manabond right away).
  2. Replies
    2,664
    Views
    756,788

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Ofcourse, if you want to be 100% sure, your best option is to aks a judge. But still, both NesretepNoj and chokin are completely misreading/misinterpreting the oracle text and FieryBalrog illustrates...
  3. Replies
    2,664
    Views
    756,788

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    I'm really sorry but that's nonsense. The oracle clarifies that you're wrong.
    "If Mox Diamond would enter the battlefield, you may discard a land card.." means that you're choosing wether to discard...
  4. Replies
    2,664
    Views
    756,788

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    Yeah, I'm aware of that, but even Protection From Fucking Everything isn't thát badass that it makes the Pro.dude indestructible.
  5. Replies
    2,664
    Views
    756,788

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    I can´t seem to see why it wouldn´t..
  6. Replies
    2,664
    Views
    756,788

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    In a way I think the combo sucks for Legacy. But on the other hand, in this deck you should be able to dredge them all into your grave, recur Grove, activate it and return 2 or 3 Punishing Fires. If...
  7. Replies
    2,664
    Views
    756,788

    Re: [Deck] 43 Lands

    A Chalice@3 costs 6 mana and is really, really rare and therefore not relevant.

    By the way, that quoted sentence actually contains some dutch. Props to you for still getting his pint:)
Results 1 to 7 of 7