Search:

Type: Posts; User: Fatal

Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    New Primer published:
    http://www.mtgthesource.com/forums/showthread.php?31927-Primer-Maverick-2-0-GW-x
  2. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    That beta duals shouldn't be played😀. Very nice
  3. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    If you need to deal with blade decks - like D&T mirror pick Maverick. It's also better equip vs wild decks :-). D&T have now problem vs K.Command and Abrade.

    Btw I reunion with old forgotten card...
  4. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Does anyone tried steely Resolve vs all those 6-7 removal, 4 snap, 4 strixes decks? Since they mostly abandon old Liliana it looks really promising
  5. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Read with pleasure, thank you for great article.

    Working on Punishing Maverick with additional black splash only for ZP.
  6. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I predict meta and made SB vs it, that was my decisions to cut discard from side. Before I tested thoughtsize and cabal therapy, from my analysis I met storm to few times to keep discard package, it...
  7. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    ad. Mother of Runes
    I missed Mom once vs BUG when having Sigarda on table and on oppoite Strix and Jace, but mom wouldn't do the job since he had enough removal to kill any other creature which I...
  8. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Actually played two tournaments day-by-day first was MKM Trial then Polish Challenge. I played two versions of Maverick on each of them.

    First MKM Trial:

    List:
    Main(61):

    4 Deathrite Shaman...
  9. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Made finish on Polish Challenge 2017 (side event on Polish Nationals 2017) with Maverick, will wrote report and list later.
  10. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Was already mention as zenithable, 5th Mother of Runes or even replacement in some meta.
  11. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Agreed that Punishing Maverick is better against anything with discard, works well also vs walkers and Strix, same is true as Snaps aggro :-).

    There is also drawback:
    - Worst manabase - less...
  12. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Looking for similar solution against Czech Pile, I found it's not favorable actually. Until last week I had heavy mana daniel plan including GQ. But last tournament I faced Czech Pile with more then...
  13. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Feedback is comming :-)


    It's much different strategy on play and on draw. Sigarda will be really nice but it cost a lot of mana, resource fight will be key factor, specially vs stifle version....
  14. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Good changes looking for feedback how it will be working with two Canopies.
  15. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    GQ is very good, I played already a lot of games when it just won me game by "strip mining" basic lands (used bth with Railler and Ramunap). I would rather found slot in nonland cards -> to put 8th...
  16. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Actually mana sinks only effective on additional resources when you already realize your strategy, fully agreed that GSZ is perfect scaling card. Shaman isn't we rather focused on strategy to resolve...
  17. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    @TMagpie

    Looks like a proof of minimum 14 sources for mana dork/turn 1 removal requirement.

    Full math resource model for Maverick is very complicated, because of:
    - Mana dorks count in...
  18. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    @ThisIsNilla

    MD:
    I would try to fit Gaddock Teeg MD, probably in slot of 1 Abrupt Decay MD. Having answer vs storm G1 any many other nasty spells like Ugin/Karn/All is Dust/Terminus etc. is hugh....
  19. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    @Skizz it's easy to count your number of duals/basics in library based on battlefield/hand/gy state. We can't but back duals/basics back on top with brainstorm, so every time you draw a dual/basic,...
  20. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Agreed with it, you don't want basic swamp unless your meta is full of moon effects. Basic scenerio:
    You fetched swamp on start and cast t.size to dodge wasteland, but most of your hands will have...
  21. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I'm glad too, anyway Maverick isn't a deck that can be played out of the box, it require adjustment to driver playstyle and experience with deck. You can't fix your bad decisions by casting...
  22. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I don't like it:

    - no MD Gaddock - so G1 vs storm is a lose, no answer vs many decks,
    - 2 Scooze MD looks overkill in today meta with so many removal, a lot of gy hate MD + SB -> 2 Priest and 2...
  23. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Request sent, good luck!
  24. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Looking for Experienced Writers for modules:
    2.2 - Silver Bullets - all one-ofs in Maverick - each "bullet" must to be described by situation of use ( taken Amace)
    2.3 - Stoneforge Mystic / Equips...
  25. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,273,740

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Today Legacy non-combo decks have 4-8 removal spells after SB (like Bolt/Fatal Push in UBR or Decay/Fatal Push in BUG) you have much more lands, and you don't need them in late game. Each good player...
Results 1 to 25 of 241
Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 4