Search:

Type: Posts; User: Megadeus

Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I'm currently doing the write up for the removal portion of the new maverick primer. I think I have covered most of the basic stuff, but if there is a card you feel should be covered that isn't as...
  2. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    The downside with safe keeper is that he's bad with stone forge because if you spend the mana to equip then safekeeper will make it fall off if you have to use it. That said, Active and attacking...
  3. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    This is true. The earlier you get her online, the better she is, but that requires running more copies of her which probably isn't that good. All in all probably just another decent 3 drop where...
  4. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Has anyone tried out the new Mirri? I need to pick one up, but I think it's a very solid SB Silver bullet
  5. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Excavator is really sick against lands. I love him there. I generally beat lands anyway, but this guy has made it so the matches aren't close
  6. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I think I may have green sunned for it once? I think in a build with canopy it's probably at its best. I haven't played with it in maverick enough though to really determine if it's better than a...
  7. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I'll write up the various removal portion if you'd like
  8. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Maybe it gets in as a SB GSZ bullet, but I'd rather have Thalia 2 personally
  9. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I watched your match in the semi finals. Pretty miserable. I complained about true name piece of shit much. If only you had my hot Rogues Passage Tech ;)

    But seriously good job. You just got...
  10. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Planning on playing the following at a Win a Mox Saturday. Not sure if I'm gonna play the teeg main or not, may end up swapping the SoLaS main for it. Haven't played the deck since Top got banned...
  11. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    If you really crave a mana sick, maybe look towards more Scooze. He can just take over and dominate games, and after an opponent uses resources removing the first one they really get beat down when...
  12. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    For $20 you can get a set of a card that is a creature version of a currently $70. I think its a good investment either way
  13. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    The one thing I'd like is to add a bit more removal or ways to deal with deathrite if I'm going to play him.
  14. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Agreed. Nic Fit isn't prevalent enough to actually worry about, and I wager it never will be as long as brainstorm and ponder are in the format
  15. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Discard feels decent against ramp decks in general. You get to either take a key early ramp spell, or let them keep the ramp garbage and take the fatty. Always a decent choice. I think the...
  16. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Explorer is tough. The best plan is to try to stunt their development early with Thalia plus waste, plow any explorer on sight if they give you a chance, and don't over extend into deed. Their deck...
  17. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I feel like Scooze is really underrated. It's very good in the deathrite mirror by turning theirs off and just in fair matches in general is very powerful. Yes against fast graveyard combo surgical...
  18. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    It's really slow, but Master of The Wild Hunt is also repeatable removal that also is a token generator and doesn't require a red splash
  19. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Light and Shadow is worth having in your arsenal as well
  20. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Just go play New Thalia against elves and see how it goes. Card is pretty nuts in the match
  21. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    If you can get aggressive enough with mana denial and removal she can stay live a fairly long time. It was always surprising to me how relevant she was at times even on turn 5+ when you are trying...
  22. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    My problem with PFire right now is that the uptick of Leotard/True Name BUG decks and combo decks that PFire is pretty shitty.
  23. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    I disagree. I think you should be able to handle UWx Stoneblade decks. Especially if you run many pride mage. None of their threats are good without equipment. And after board choke is still...
  24. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Any thought of moving back to straight GW now that decay for CB isn't needed? Or is Deathrite Decay too good to not play? GW allows better mana, and less losses to moons. Also Maverick was...
  25. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,269,430

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    True, but they can never beat a Thalia + Karakas.
Results 1 to 25 of 197
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4