Search:

This thread reminds me of drunks or football hooligans who come close to bashing eachother's skull in over a disagreement about their team's composition. Participants in either 'debate' have about...

Why? It's not as if Wizards gives a rat's ass about what people have to say about a potential future ban/unban on any of these forums, and people seem to enjoy such completely impactless bickering.

Yes, without any argument. Still, Scroll Rack would allow you to dig several cards deep, and together with Counterbalance you'd be able to stack your library to counter one single spell each time. ...

It's obviously a less efficient alternative, but I can imagine people trying to use Scroll Rack together with Counterbalance, in the absence of top.

Extra vote for Trump. MtG would be a lot more fun if they gave MaRo's job to him.

I'm not saying that they should, or will, make cards that can only target basics, but there is no rule in the game that prevents cards or effects from specifically targeting basic lands. Decks which...

I know. But this creature would destroy their one or two basics, and leave them with useless lands.

I know they'd be hesitant to do this, but red cards that specifically hate against basic lands and which are introduced via commander decks could spice it up a bit. A 2/1 legend for RR that forces...