he had 2 byes and played 3-3 then ....
http://magic.wizards.com/en/events/coverage/gplil15/round-2-results-2015-07-04
Type: Posts; User: Stephan/
he had 2 byes and played 3-3 then ....
http://magic.wizards.com/en/events/coverage/gplil15/round-2-results-2015-07-04
^^ not worth reading in here when realists get insulted.
^^ is this the "personal use for kitchen table"?
Why is this so important? :eyebrow:
I really don't care whether my opponent is playing proxies or not (even in tournaments) - MtG shouldn't be a status symbol. I just don't want to get scammed...
Exactly. It looks like it was printed as one picture.
First of all the pattern doesn't seem correct, but the major difference to a real card is that the characters are stamped onto the pattern -> thus they have sharp edges. Just poor fakes - nothing...
The line should be there, but the color is off and shouldn't be blue. But anyways, the pattern and specially the characters seem inaccurate - easy distinguishable in trade :smile:
@theBloody: it's not fake - just read my posts. It's just panic and delusion of some people.
^^ none of them is in bold font - just variance. Although these two might be at extremes of the spectrum - one is to thin and one to thick in letters (also depends on amount of printing ink)....
^^ doesn't look like fake, just normal variance in printing occurring very often. The guy posting these photos from several "fake cards" is already suspended on MTG Salvation.
you need it that desperately? .... poor boy :frown:
There is already a primer for this deck - no need for new ones or other showmanships .... just merge this one with the older and already existing ones, please.
@jrw1985: Really nice to see that you also came to quite similar results in playin Rw - boarding out Thalia a couple of times gainst RiP is just right in my humble opinion, although I'm playing with...
.... or Gaddock Teeg ^^
btw: I would also not play with Daze - currently playing 4 Fow, 3 Flusterstorm, 3 Overmaster (which aren't that bad as cantrips when you have to play a 'blind' Omniscience
.... playing 3 Griselbrand and 1 Emrakul (for Time of Need in SB).
Of course I S&T in Griselbrand gainst most situations, because a fast Griselbrand just often wins the game - you can't always...
Well, control decks usually don't play Daze and in my humble opinion additional lands just seem better than Petals to play around Pierce. I just don't believe that you can win with speed gainst...
^^ I'm playing Karakas in sideboard since a couple of weeks and really don't think that those seem bad. The only point I would disagree is boarding out an Ancient Tomb for them - most times in the...