Search:

Point #5 seems silly but yes, he made valid points. But it's an uphill battle and hoping for your opponent to misplay doesn't seem like a good idea.

1. Your creatures are likely DOA since we run so few.
2. Will get auto-hit with counters/discard.
3/4: Killing yourself doesn't seem like a good plan when they run more creatures and you lack burn...

Curl up into a ball and cry itself to sleep?

Volcanic Fallout is superior.

Which is pretty much every turn past 3. top decking it is the worse feeling in the world.

Burn does NOT want bad top decks.

I've tested Devil and he's terrible. When you want a 4/3, you get 4 damage. When you want 4 damage, you get a 4/3 that's useless.

Yeah for some reason I thought they did. Fix'd my post.

I disagree. We sometimes use Sulfuric Vortex and that also "delays you by a turn". Thing is, sometimes burn won't kill in time. Sometimes, we might need something else to help guarantee those last...

I feel like 4 may be too many, but let me know how they test and whether you ever felt like your hand was clogged with them.

The list here seems more like a RDW deck and less a Burn deck. I feel like having less creatures would give you more mileage with your Young Pyromancers. If you must run creatures in burn, Guides,...

Has anyone tested Young Pyromancer in burn?

He seem's like he'd be a natural fit.

Burn may not be a Tier 1 deck, but it's a great meta-deck. I love the butthurt over people losing with their $2,000 to a $100 deck.

If you see a lot of decks that are soft to Burn (BUG, Jund),...

So what are your thoughts about creatureless burn?

Maybe stuff like Flamebreak and Volcanic Fallout to kill creatures and just pitch the combo match game 1.

Here is some super secret tech:


Pyromancer's Swath
Ensnaring Bridge
Flame Jab


Swath gives you more damage for all burn spells. Bridge keeps nasty creatures at bay. Jab makes your...