Search:

I concur. Running both Mandrills and Cruise in the same deck is not only a lack of mere synergy it is not plausibly playable or viable together. i simply cannot see playing both in the same deck.

I concur with the majority of this [recent] thread, Hidden Gibbons is prudent tech right now and in the present legacy metagame, it deserves some serious consideration for some sideboard slots.

Well in fairness, Mandrills doesn't "die" to submerge. Yes, it is not healthy and is a huge buzz kill; however, with no Mongoose or Treasure Cruise is is not too difficult to recast. Also, the threat...

I am compelled to believe that 3x is the correct number for Mandrills. 4x is too many primarily for the reason you have already articulated above. As already alluded to recently herein, the original...

I concur with everything you said pertaining to stifle; it is amazing right now in the present metagame and has so many tangible uses.

However, i categorically disagree with playing any number of...

All excellent points; however, you forgot to add how much better Mandrills is against Counterbalance!

So while both Mandrills and Nimble are equal against Terminus, people say well STP owns...

Dude, Chalice equally affects Mongoose. Bad argument.



Not really. Again, this cannot be emphasized enough, Nimble Mongoose is not playable in the same deck as Hooting Mandrills! So for the...

Again, as it has already been said a lot thus far, our cheap efficient counters take care of the predominant spot removal in the format right now.

Moreover, whether you play 2, 3 or 4, this card,...

I applaud the recent posts trying to evolve the deck not by changing it drastically, but by suggesting rather prudent yet subtle changes to make it more formidable in the present metagame.
...

So True!

Playing three (3) rough/ tumble is too much for a metagame plagued with so much combo and control right now. If you're having that much trouble with death and taxes try Sulfur Elemental....