Search:

Type: Posts; User: PirateKing

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    214
    Views
    85,791

    Re: [RIX] Rivals of Ixalan

    Not with the Ixalan rulings changes. 614.12, 614.16d: Now, to determine what replacement effects will apply to a permanent entering the battlefield, you look at continuous effects that modify that...
  2. Replies
    214
    Views
    85,791

    Re: [RIX] Rivals of Ixalan

    If it had haste instead of first strike I could see an argument in a Burn as sideboard tech against a few cards, but if the choice is between dealing damage and doing something cute, the answer is to...
  3. Replies
    214
    Views
    85,791

    Re: [RIX] Rivals of Ixalan

    Problem with the CMC 1 argument is that it can't be played without a creature, so either you're playing with CMC 0 creatures or you're casting it on turn 2, so the cost isn't a fair representation.
  4. Replies
    214
    Views
    85,791

    Re: [RIX] Rivals of Ixalan

    The GW walker seemed like it could have worked in Elves as another glimpse or to psuedo Hoof, if it was something like CITP with loyalty equal to the number of creatures and not the turn after. Plus...
  5. Replies
    214
    Views
    85,791

    Re: [RIX] Rivals of Ixalan

    Okay... so this is something that triggers from casting that card and then for every card afterwards, or is it a universal status like threshold that you get even if you don't have any cards with the...
Results 1 to 5 of 5