I can't deny what you're saying, and I haven't tried the card, but it didn't even look like a candidate to me :
- costs 4 : D&T is a mana hungry deck, it would be our most mana-intensive/slowest...
Type: Posts; User: ParkerLewis
I can't deny what you're saying, and I haven't tried the card, but it didn't even look like a candidate to me :
- costs 4 : D&T is a mana hungry deck, it would be our most mana-intensive/slowest...
This is the exact same failure of an argument that is used every time. You evaluate a proposal by calculating only what it costs you and negating what it provides you. What you've done is evaluate...
If there really seems there is nothing you can part with, and you do miss the 3rd Revoker, that's typically the situation where going 61 cards would be justifiable. Unless you're already at 61,...
Anyone willing to argue about it on the Internet, maybe. In real life, there are a lot of people able to perfectly understand how and why the 60 card goal, although a sensible objective, is...
Oh, I could ; the question is more whether I'm willing to. Especially since Karakas prices have been slightly going down recently (probably due to the EM release), so even if I end up going for it...
What this is really saying is that 3x Karakas is better than none, and there's probably not much to say on that point (thanks for pointing out the S&S / Reanimator matchups though). Not running it is...
Stupid question from someone (me) who never played the deck but is considering building it.
Is Karakas still that needed in the deck ? I mean, I now see typical decklists with only one eligible...