Search:

Type: Posts; User: SellaNona

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    3,300
    Views
    1,150,418

    Re: [DTB] Turbo Depths

    Was thinking of throwing together this deck since my favorite part of playing Maverick was getting to Merit Lage people. I read the OP and checked out a few decklists, came up with

    4x Elvish...
  2. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    https://deckstats.net/decks/110808/1045916-gw-maverick/en

    Probably will run something like this for a while. Maindeck ratios can still be messed with (not sure how I feel about 3x Mom 3x...
  3. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    In a perfect world DRS isn't the fourth most played card in the format.

    The best part of Knight is its utility. If it weren't for that we'd just play Goyfs at which point we might as well just...
  4. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    Decks like Grixis, Miracles, Czech Pile, etc. are going to force you to play the grindy game whether you like it or not
  5. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    Punishing has a better matchup into control decks (Delver variants, Czech Pile, etc) or any grindy matchup since they tend to be heavily advantage-based and having a recurrable way to kill deathrites...
  6. Replies
    1,283
    Views
    410,582

    Re: [Deck] Spanish Inquisition (B/x Storm Combo)

    I guess I'll just start by buying my LEDs and then see if I'll make enough over the next few months to afford the Land Grant version~
  7. Replies
    1,283
    Views
    410,582

    Re: [Deck] Spanish Inquisition (B/x Storm Combo)

    Sorely tempted to try Land Grant but LEDs plus a playset of Mox Opals are a bit too expensive. Would also have to pick up a second Bayou although I really should be doing that anyways
  8. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    You can try it. Do keep in mind that Deathrite eats removal like crazy and GSZ won't do anything if you draw the singleton copy though. I'm sure you'll be fine overall but no blue land will screw you...
  9. Replies
    1,283
    Views
    410,582

    Re: [Deck] Spanish Inquisition (B/x Storm Combo)

    I am *sorely* tempted to buy LED's just to play this deck since it seems like the kind of fun pet deck I'd love to fuck around with.
    Is the PSI list in OP still up to date?
  10. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    I'd say 1-2 max, 2 if you don't mind seeing it more often.
  11. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    This is honestly a very tough question. I've played both variants and while I personally enjoy playing Punishing Maverick a lot more, I'd have to say it's probably best to go with Dark Maverick just...
  12. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    I don't want to buy a Trop just to run Leo but I probably should. Have been planning to pick back up the stuff to play Maverick variants other than Punishing over the next few months anyways.

    Not...
  13. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    As menloe said, Teeg/Canonist and pray. I find that mom + either teeg or canonist generally wins games against storm. Of course, there's always the chance they'll open nuts and combo off turn 1-2,...
  14. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    True. I guess I just have to start hoping that I actually get matched against Blue decks for once, or at least fairer matchups. There aren't too many combo players (I think there are only 2 or so...
  15. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    Guess It's an extra hard matchup for me since I'm on punishing Maverick and don't have much in the way of mana tax/hand disruption :/

    I've been getting super unlucky when it comes to matches, I...
  16. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    Is there really anything we can do about Omnitell when they open well? I played against it at locals today and got 2-0'd since they had Show and Tell + Omniscience and a threat both games by turn 2-3...
  17. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    I guess the question is really how necessary it is. Scryb Ranger is already a decent flyer for us to stick an equipment on, which would be the main use for it imho.
  18. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    Traded off all of my spare stuff to pick up Taiga, Plateau, Groves, Foothills, Depths and a bunch of other miscellaneous stuff. I also had enough left over to get non-foil knights and stoneforges (my...
  19. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    I'm switching off of Dark Maverick for a while to try Punishing Maverick instead. Although I will miss having Decays for the Miracles matchup, I feel that the Grove/Pfire package more than makes up...
  20. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    @Stuart

    I have been considering a second pridemage.

    How good is Thalia in the miracles matchup? I know it seems like a weird question, but they accumulate so many lands over the course of the...
  21. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    @pettdan

    Thanks for the response! Your reasoning was clear and very helpful.

    Seems like not having a Cradle is screwing me out of a lot of interesting techs/play lines, which is a shame. Sort...
  22. Replies
    873
    Views
    302,112

    Re: [Primer] Maverick 2.0 - GW/x

    Recently started playing Legacy again. Trying to adjust my Maverick list to the current meta. My locals has seen a real upsurge in Miracles players (went from one dedicated guy to 4-5 of em). Other...
Results 1 to 22 of 23