Search:

Type: Posts; User: yankeedave

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by yankeedave
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    723,903

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Well, I have a couple of Merfolk lists in my meta and it does seem a 50/50 battle, as they either stomp you or vice versa. There are very few wars of attrition in this matchup, and if they have a lot...
  2. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by yankeedave
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    723,903

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    @FoulQ - RWM is a pain in the arse, and it is one of the few critters I will aim a spell at. The only other one I can think of is a first striker when I want to get an elemental thru! And maybe a...
  3. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by yankeedave
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    723,903

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Well, I run quite a controversial list, at least by the standards of this forum. i have played this deck since about 2004, and it has slowly evolved over the years. Here's my list:

    18 Mountain
    ...
  4. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by yankeedave
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    723,903

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Here in the UK, we have an emergent metagame, which involves a lot of dredge and basic lands, so I find that I have moved two PoP to the sideboard and running 4 Hellspark and 2 Ball Lightning against...
  5. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by yankeedave
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    723,903

    Re: [DTW] Burn

    This deck is all about virtual card advantage. Your opponent will draw dead card after dead card with this deck and this is one of the ways it shines! Creature removal? Dead. Artifact removal? Dead....
  6. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by yankeedave
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    723,903

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    I think that is because you actually do, but its a long thread, not everyone will read it all :cool:

    Yankee
  7. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by yankeedave
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    723,903

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    I would rather see Cave-In or Flamebreak in your Pyroclasm slot as they give you damage on your opponent. I would also run Pyrostatic Pillar instead of Blood Moon, as it screws over combo and you...
  8. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by yankeedave
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    723,903

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    To be honest, if I can catch it in a Flamebreak and maybe one bolt, then fine, otherwise, i am just gonna go BOOM HEADSHOT like I always have. This deck is about virtual card advantage and dropping...
  9. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by yankeedave
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    723,903

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    My Meta is pretty varied and you never know what you are going to be up against, so I would be tempted to run 3 Flamebreak MD and then a couple of Cave-In in the SB for really heavy creature decks,...
  10. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by yankeedave
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    723,903

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    AfFOWnity? There are always things to look out for. And I would rather play more burn on t3 than 3 if I can help it.

    Hmm, I wonder about running MM and Magma Jet, seems like a nice plan and I dont...
  11. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by yankeedave
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    723,903

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    I am currently running ole Sparky, but I find him a dead card if I dont hit him in the first two turns, as after that, most people can deal with it. I am thinking of going back to Mogg Fanatic, as he...
  12. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by yankeedave
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    723,903

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Had not seen the Javelin, that will be my choice if I have to run a 4 damage/ 3cc card!

    And I dont like Sonic Seizure, as the deck is meant to use everything it draws, so discarding a card at...
  13. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by yankeedave
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    723,903

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    I am not sure what to put in those last few slots either, I am testing Char at the moment, but we will see.

    @ Bovinious - thanks for the tip mate, took the colour out of my post!
  14. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by yankeedave
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    723,903

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Hmm, I like the changes you have made so far, I would be tempted however not to drop the Pyrostatic Pillars from your sideboard unless you don't see a lot of Affinity in your meta. It demolishes...
  15. Thread: [Deck] Burn

    by yankeedave
    Replies
    2,788
    Views
    723,903

    Re: [Deck] Burn

    Ahh, my first post on a MTG forum in 3 years - its good to have a break.

    Now, I love this deck and used to play a Sligh version of it and even took it to the Type 1 Classic several years ago here...
Results 1 to 15 of 15