Search:

Type: Posts; User: ivanpei

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,374,353

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I agree, byes have alot to do with it. His decks are extremely metarized. He doesn't have to fight through a couple of rounds of random first. The benefit of repeal at the top tables is that it's...
  2. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,374,353

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Since we see alot of pridemage, I think that the manland, plains and humility may be equally effective too. You'd need to trim jace's to 3 though. I wouldn't run elspeth too because that's too many 4...
  3. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,374,353

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I think that Gerry t's emphasis on basics is pretty important. Getting double white is gonna be tough. If you guys go for the double white plan, you're gonna need basic plains and that messes up the...
  4. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,374,353

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I dislike Repeal, feels slow and clunky IMO. It needs more STP/Paths. 4 Jaces feels too much as well. Deck also needs 3 Shackles, card is a bomb. You can dodge vial by just killing everything that...
  5. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,374,353

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I tried to keep my nose out of this but there's too much self defending in here. This is a good deck in the venge-survival meta. If I were playing this deck, I would play six 4 cc TOPS. That would be...
Results 1 to 5 of 6