Search:

Type: Posts; User: criticalslay

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    3,300
    Views
    1,150,682

    Re: [Deck] Dark Depths

    I would be interested in that.
  2. Replies
    3,300
    Views
    1,150,682

    Re: [Deck] Dark Depths

    Thanks for the quick reply. Are there matchups not listed where you think rite is useful, or even critical?
  3. Replies
    3,300
    Views
    1,150,682

    Re: [Deck] Dark Depths

    I know this has been discussed previously in this forum, but I would like to revisit rite of consumption. I have played this deck at length, and never had a good experience with rite. It seems, to...
  4. Replies
    3,300
    Views
    1,150,682

    Re: [Deck] Dark Depths

    RE: #5 - I find that with some hands, even if I have the needle, I wouldn’t care or even would actively want them to waste my turn 1 land. Some hands I think blind needle is correct, the more...
  5. Replies
    3,300
    Views
    1,150,682

    Re: [Deck] Dark Depths

    1. This hand is a snap keep; you have the combo and your hand isn’t excessively clunky. In G2/G3, well, this hand has a needle - so it’s obviously an opponent needle is good against. I would still...
  6. Replies
    3,300
    Views
    1,150,682

    Re: [Deck] Dark Depths

    Do you find you need help with S&S? I’ve found the matchup to be fairly easy (small sample size, however). What’s your full SB?
  7. Replies
    3,300
    Views
    1,150,682

    Re: [Deck] Dark Depths

    Thanks!

    I’ll try to do a write up to the best of my ability at some point, no promises in the quality, haha.

    Not sure about the libray split, literally the first list I picked up had this split...
  8. Replies
    3,300
    Views
    1,150,682

    Re: [Deck] Dark Depths

    Hey, this is Dan, guy from GP Santa Clara. Never posted here but I figured now would be a good time. As you noted I’m relatively new with the deck. Added the fifth fetch because I felt like I was...
Results 1 to 8 of 8