Search:

nonononononono. Resolve Cataclysm and you win. MUC needs to have lands in play to work. Cataclysm and Aether Vial are the key spells for winning this matchup.

But I agree that Cataclysm is a...

Flickerwisp is a good example of versatility. Not like True Believer, which is only "versatile" (more correctly: useful) if your opponent is playing a very specific deck, but actually versatile...

If True Believer would reliably beat the shit out of "random" decks, it would be ok. But with every "random" deck you name that he is good against, I can name another one that he isn't good against....

Meh. I don't really care about Believer's strength against janky Sui Black with Edicts or janky Scepter Chant. Unless you're preparing your list for an extremely specific meta, in which these decks...

A WINRAR IS YOU

So which matchups does this improve? Combo? Playing two random Believers shouldn't mean that you have a serious chance preboard. What else?

I still have no idea why anybody would consider playing a Grizzly Bear for WW main. Can you give your reasoning on that?

In a meta such as Magic League -- 62 decks, not a single copy of Tendrils of Agony (but one Tinker and one Vamp. Tutor O_o) -- you really don't need Thorns and Glowriders in the main. I built this...

Yeah, in a meta where combo is non-existant, mono-white lists are a house. I thought, when a bad Kithkin White Weenie list can top 8 the master, I can win a trial with a good "White Weenie" list. For...

Resolve Vial.


And, resolve Cataclysm.