Search:

Type: Posts; User: Philipp2293

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Also, vs Miracles, you have to be very careful with Geddon if they are able to flip Top and ETA in response which is basically game over, unless you have a very commanding board presence.
  2. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    @Stuhl: Could you share your current list?
  3. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Unfortunately, the meta hasn't developed well for Maverick. The biggest problem is the printing of True-Name Nemesis, which is really bad news for this deck since it suffers from the card itself and...
  4. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    @Liege/Vial interaction:

    While definitely weaker than Liege, if you want a similar effect that is more in line with Aether Vial interaction, you could run Veteran Armorer. I don't, since I don't...
  5. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Quodlaser Maverick, love the streamlined look of it. Time to bust out my pimped out Maverick again. I'm not so sure if Maze is where you want to be in a TNN World, and I'm also not a fan of Cradle in...
  6. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    Also, apart from Elves (where Polukranos is way too slow anyway) those MUs range from easy to even, so not sure if it's an issue that needs to be adressed. PF sounds right if your meta is infested...
  7. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    From your list I would start cutting the 3rd Library and then shave some Stoneforges. I would, at minimum play 3, if you expect to face combo in your meta I'd run 4.
  8. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    No offense, but that's a weak question to ask when you're not even running Thalia.
  9. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Connecting with equipment is easier.
  10. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Luis finished first after swiss rounds. GL for the top 8!
  11. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    I think Bloodbraid is out of competion, because of the antisynergy with GSZ. I think Sigarda and Thrun are both fine bullets, both in the current Meta I value Sigarda higher, as there are several...
  12. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    No, you really don't need Cradle to use Ooze. Also, I wouldn't ever consider cutting ooze from the deck.
  13. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [Deck] GW/x Maverick

    :eyebrow:

    Also, the fact that Swords hit Griselbrand is nearly irrelevant, cause either they draw into a counter for it anyway, or if they don't or decide to let it resolve, they basically get a...
  14. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    That's an interesting suggestion, the problem I see is that they often bring in Disenchant effects in anticipation of Library/Choke anyway, plus many Miracle decks have EE somewhere in their 75.
    ...
  15. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Miracles and Omnitell, mostly.
  16. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    I think Koby's comment was directed at the High Tide MU and how to interact with Wipe Away.
  17. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Yesterday I won a really nice english Moat at the 2nd Legacy Open Graz. My list was:

    4 Savannah
    4 Windswept Heath
    2 Wooded Foothulls
    2 Forest
    1 Plains
    4 Wasteland
    2 Cavern of Souls
    1...
  18. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Problem against Miracles is even if a miracled Terminus is taxed, it should be payable most of the time. Also, since he lacks first strike, Glowride seems like a huge liability in aggro/tribal MUs.
    ...
  19. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    It's far from dead, but I also think that with 2 hard MUs (Miracles and Omnitell) somewhere between Tier 1 and 1.5 it's not the greatest time to be on Maverick.

    Also, I'm not really sure if I...
  20. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    I've made to switch to Geddon effects from Choke (1 Ravages 1 Geddon in SB), but you have to be really careful if they have top cause they may Mini-ETA you which might be enough after resetting the...
  21. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Also, only 4 spot removals in your 75 is really on the low side, chances are RUG will simpy have one more Delver than you have removal. Also, with that configuration I wouldn't be too happy about the...
  22. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Since for some reason quoting him doesn't work, exactly what the above user said is true. Thalia is often good enough to build up a critical board presence, where even swinging with Emrakul is not...
  23. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Guys, at least give the guy some respect, as I suppose he's the creator of the deck, no need to be condescending, I guess he has paid close enough attention to the development of the deck and has his...
  24. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    In my opinion if Martell's Esper build really becomes the standard build for Blade Control, the MD Maze may become mandatory. A wave of flyers coupled with Jitte are a serious issue.
  25. Replies
    8,553
    Views
    2,274,727

    Re: [DTB] GW/x Maverick

    Which is not great due to Knight/Karakas against Maverick and even boarded out by some Hive Mind Players.
Results 1 to 25 of 82
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4