Search:

Ahhh... the old "people I disagree with are trolls" argument.

He's proven he's incapable of polite or sensible discussion. He wants to play legacy for less than the price of a cup of coffee. You're wasting time engaging with him.

Sure but they're also the core of every deck and useable in multiple decks, so why does them being lands matter specifically in regards to cost? If anything, surely the lands should reasonably be the...

What's the relevance of them being lands?

I see similar discussions among standard players, especially on Arena, saying "I can't believe I have to spend rare wildcards on lands". But lands are...

Glad we can now firmly establish you aren't interested in having a serious discussion.

Why are these hypothetical good players playing bad decks?

Your first response was regarding the potential for reduced player pool to cause reduced demand which might affect prices. I agree, it...

A bizarre comment. People will have a recognisable archetype within the meta, or an interesting brew using cards common in the meta. My concern is that they play intelligently with what they have. As...

You've made an unsubstantiated link between the ability to easily switch decks and player quality which I don't believe exists.

Yes I care about the values, but saying that firesales require price...

But that's not the point you made and that I agreed with.

You said you can't easily switch decks, which I agree with. But I like the archetype I have no desire to change decks, so it doesn't...

How exactly did I say the opposite?

A fair point, though neither of those issues particularly bothers me.

Magic costs money to play, that's just how it is. Legacy requires a fairly high investment vs other formats, but then the cards hold or increase their value so the net cost of getting it into is...

I'm fine with the reserved list. If you wanna play Legacy you better be prepared to invest, as I did.