How so?
Also; 'Nacle would need to be banned then cuz having 2 of these effects in play at the same time seems even more obnoxious to the format than the stuff most people complain about here...
Type: Posts; User: Fjaulnir
How so?
Also; 'Nacle would need to be banned then cuz having 2 of these effects in play at the same time seems even more obnoxious to the format than the stuff most people complain about here...
...and your opponent doesn't get to put in a free uncounterable O Ring or whatever either.
If nothing changes with the next 1-2 B&R updates, that might just happen for me.
Or more likely quit Magic all together, as there aren't any other magic formats that interest me judging from what...
Except it's not, and it's often 'literally' DoubleThoughtseize (for only 2 life once though), and I've even had it be a TripleThoughtseizeFor2Life.
Does this look like a fine new card design? ...
FWIW, some of the more hated cards / cards that are being called out as potential bans, are now being under- and overrepresented in the way MTGO decklists are now being selected:
...
No bans? Sure.
No changes? :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
Hehe I know that feeling all too well!! As an Enchantress player being a total sitting duck against storm 95% of games, even with Leyline of Sanctity.
Then again I don't consider Enchantress to...
2016-2017 GPS in reverse order:
GP Louisville:
Brainstorm: 24/32
Ponder: 22/32
DRS: 16/32
GP Chiba:
Brainstorm: 24/32
Ponder: 18/32
Also FYI, 17th place was Andrea Mengucci as the highest ranked 21pt player. So it was a clean cutoff at 7-1-1 / noone fell out of top 16 based on tie breakers. That's always good in my book!
Hell yeah that's the kind of Legacy I want to see!!
Also, depending on ones optimism one could also read into some of the comments about Vintage what they intend to do with Legacy? I.e. didn't want to shake up things right before Eternal Weekend...
So, today's the big day?
#inb4ponderban
Well, it seems cool to me actually, a sort of Legacy but only Old Border cards allowed or something like that :-) (not the 93/94 that excludes too much, but still with cards mostly preluding all the...
But why is the burden not on their opponent for having outs to chalice/countertop? :) Not arguing with the SnS one here, that's really A + B = 95% win. But resolving a Chalice is still far from...