Search:

Type: Posts; User: jmlima

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    And, a card that was specially banned in pauper became legal. (the drake)
  2. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    My only regret was ever upgrading from XP when they said they would continue to support Vista SP2...
  3. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    Now that MTGO seemingly stopped working on Vista, without warning and since the last update, I'm looking to flog my collection:

    https://deckbox.org/sets/540886

    Legacy wise, I've got a Nic-Fit...
  4. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    For people in the US:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/MTGLegacy/comments/52vzj3/mtg_community_legacy_league/
  5. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    And another step closer to the day where we are going to be told that 'because its to resource-intensive to maintain other formats, only standard and draft will be supported in MTGO':
    ...
  6. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    Alas, it won't. Draft format and reprints made for odd companions.
  7. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    You may still get your Port... :tongue:

    Buy Mortimer, buy!....

    Edit: I find particularly comical his comment about twitter being an horrendous method for these discussions. Well, guess which...
  8. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    Sorry to say but, based on my experience as a game designer, the days of highly complex games being able to drawn in millions (as in number of players) are largely gone. Even games like FM, which...
  9. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    Its a trade off between what you lose and what you gain. Online platforms are born and die, its the nature of it. I would not hesitate to do it if I was sure that my new platform could give me 50%...
  10. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    One point I would ad to my reasoning above, there is nothing committing Hasbro to keep MTGO up to date. Once they have a new platform, there is zero forcing them to commit an iota of resources, other...
  11. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    I will get my crystal ball and CEO hat and predict the following:

    They will do a new and improved DotP platform, with simplified game mechanics but entirely tailored for online competition, to...
  12. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    Ah, the joys of unregulated markets. Of course, WotC do not benefit from the secondary market. :rolleyes:
  13. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    I'll offer you a Port on MTGO if they come down to $30.
  14. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    Not going to happen, Wasteland will not significantly drop in price and Port is actually going up since EMA announcement, so even if it drops, it will continue to be the most expensive card by a mile.
  15. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    It's now fixed!
  16. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    Have you noticed that in all the screenies you posted (that I could find), when you play the same player you always lose one and win one against that player? Bizarre.

    I never had the same...
  17. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    Your mention of the ToS means you are aware that the cards are actually owned by WotC. I agree it would be a shitstorm, but if they are looking to reset the business then the big traders won't matter...
  18. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    In MTGO when was anything ever simple to change?

    Can't wait for the 2HG release events on MTGO. :tongue:
  19. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    Yup.

    https://www.reddit.com/r/magicTCG/comments/2qljcm/lsv_casts_ponder_to_get_tendrils_for_the_win/
  20. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    And... Pauper is getting leagues ahead of legacy and vintage...
  21. Thread: MTGO discussion

    by jmlima
    Replies
    579
    Views
    171,596

    Re: MTGO discussion

    Nothing is safe to assume with regards to leagues. It might be 1 month, 1 year or 1 decade.
Results 1 to 21 of 21