Well, that is a good argument for keeping IGG in (as I was saying, bringing it in does hurt double business hands), and seems like a reasonable analysis.
I can agree with that and this is a good...
Type: Posts; User: loop
Re: [Deck] T.E.S. - The EPIC Storm
Well, that is a good argument for keeping IGG in (as I was saying, bringing it in does hurt double business hands), and seems like a reasonable analysis.
I can agree with that and this is a good...
Re: [Deck] T.E.S. - The EPIC Storm
Yes, I realize you can go IT->Wish->IGG, but that's effectively quite a bit slower. Hence why I said that bringing IGG in could speed you up.
I also think that what you suggested (Wish->IT) is more...
Re: [Deck] T.E.S. - The EPIC Storm
What I was saying is that by bringing IGG in, it allows you to go for the loop with only IT as business, not IT+wish, do you seriously not understand that?
As for 2x LED being able to pay for wish...
Re: [Deck] T.E.S. - The EPIC Storm
I don't understand jin's argument for maindeck Tendrils. You must have gotten confused when counting mana if you truly believe that 2x LED cannot pay for Wish + Tendrils post-IGG, try re-thinking the...