No, it was Javier Dominquez.
http://archive.wizards.com/Magic/magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/other/021202014B
Type: Posts; User: Quasim0ff
No, it was Javier Dominquez.
http://archive.wizards.com/Magic/magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/other/021202014B
http://archive.wizards.com/Magic/magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/other/021202014B
Considerng Dispel doesn't stop Terminus, Show and Tell, Entreat the Angels... That's a pretty large portion of relevant spells.
*Dispel is also shit versus storm. Flusterstorm is not (duh)
Isn't flusterstorm strictly better?
I just read his decklist.
It seems rather suicidal playing Bob in a lost sporting 4 Force, 2 Dig and Angler, and 3 thoughseize, anyhow. :D
As a miracles player, I'd much rather play against clique than Bob.
If I played vs Omni, I'd prefer clique though.
Very unlikely, as that'd be very reactive and present no real clock.
I'm not playing this deck (anymore) but I'd actually argue that, yes - You do actively want to go longer than the other delver decks, due to the lack of reach (lightning bolts).
From my POV, the problem with this matchup is that, once miracles stabilized, it's really hard to squeeze the last points of damage through. This is where Tar Pit can come in handy.