I like this and find it a lot more elegant than some suggestions like "can't be played if your deck contains a blue card." Although still a little ugly from a design perspective, I also wouldn't mind...
Type: Posts; User: pinkfrosting
I like this and find it a lot more elegant than some suggestions like "can't be played if your deck contains a blue card." Although still a little ugly from a design perspective, I also wouldn't mind...
Most of your points seem to be debating the semantics of terms that you define and then redefine yourself. If "Ponder/BS/FoW" is a "core" how is "Cryptic/Snap/Serum visions" not a "core?" Because at...
While TNN is linear and format warping I don't think it is to an extent that it breaks the format. There are answers in a variety of colors and decks that ignore him completely
Personally I'm fine...
I think a variety of archetypes with various match up weights that keep each other in check is inherent to the game design in magic, so yes it is a factor in modern as well. But the format is slower...
A combo deck that is vulnerable to grave hate, creature removal, and countermagic and takes 3-4 turns to go off isn't really comparable to legacy combo, but I see your point. I mean they have...
I dont get this kind of thinking. If you honestly dislike combo play modern. I'd consider t1 force check decks like TES and BR reanimator to be even more brainless by your standards, and they're all...