Search:

Type: Posts; User: Fox

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.03 seconds.

  1. Replies
    4,538
    Views
    695,005

    Re: [Deck] Dreadstill - Enter the Fist

    Itís a fine card to discard to hand size without losing CA from a draw 3. The hardcast modes are better, including access to counters which make for 5/5 elks and it can reach Gurmag-killing size on...
  2. Replies
    4,538
    Views
    695,005

    Re: [Deck] Dreadstill - Enter the Fist

    Zendikar Rising review:
    Lots of tools for budget manabases, especially for UR. Okay'ish support for not-Standstill CA (See the Truth and Confidant). Don't care about 3rd iteration of black enchant...
  3. Replies
    22,890
    Views
    2,764,530

    Sticky: Poll: Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Legacy is as fine as it always was. Any time something fun an interesting comes along and shakes up the format it usually gets banned. Outside of these fun interludes [things like DTT, Breach, and...
  4. Replies
    22,890
    Views
    2,764,530

    Sticky: Poll: Re: All B/R update speculation.

    The thing that people don't seem to get is that Oko is a Flametongue Kavu vs pretty much any other existing source of recurring value source which sits on the battlefield, particularly other PWs. Any...
  5. Thread: Root Maze Prison

    by Fox
    Replies
    3
    Views
    247

    Re: Root Maze Prison

    Cut green and Ghostly Prison, upload Soldier Stompy. Upgrade Soldier Stompy to DnT. Upgrade DnT to Goblins or Esper Vial [this is a stopping point].

    Your deck canít overcome topdecking redundant...
  6. Replies
    4,538
    Views
    695,005

    Re: [Deck] Dreadstill - Enter the Fist

    Look back in this thread to time between Uro spoiler and Uro release date and you'll find the ideas behind it, and the problems that plague it. The list is a rough draft of what the deck would look...
  7. Replies
    4,538
    Views
    695,005

    Re: [Deck] Dreadstill - Enter the Fist

    The core of Dreadnought and Uro is Lotus Field which allows comboing Stifle in all directions, not to mention dumping honest Field off Uro trigger to ramp escape fodder. The payoff is Nissa of the...
  8. Replies
    248
    Views
    13,586

    Re: Zendikar Resurgent spoilers: Eldrazi Need Not Apply

    I don't think you really need to try any force a tribe that isn't particularly solvent. Look for decks currently on Confidant but have no Mox/Loam or Depths; these are probably better off with this...
  9. Replies
    5
    Views
    200

    Re: Teferi Time Reveler

    If you [+1] your Teferi, you can Snapcaster a Ponder with the flashback at instant speed, yes.

    Snapcaster gives an ability until the end of the turn, whereas a card like Dreadhorde has to cast a...
  10. Replies
    248
    Views
    13,586

    Re: Zendikar Resurgent spoilers: Eldrazi Need Not Apply

    I wouldnít read too much into the unproductive territory of trying to break the super mode on this card.

    Youíve got a 2cmc, basically unblockable (and for sure no Ice-Fang/Strix block cheese),...
  11. Replies
    248
    Views
    13,586

    Re: Zendikar Resurgent spoilers: Eldrazi Need Not Apply

    The clone card us not unreasonable alongside manlands like Factory. The slow speed of the card skews it towards UW however, in which case it loses the battle for a slot to Sevinne's.
  12. Replies
    4,538
    Views
    695,005

    Re: [Deck] Dreadstill - Enter the Fist

    For discord add GrossNuggligence#5645 and I will send invite. On the UW version, thereís not a huge amount of discussion since Iím the sole designer and for a long time the only player. Look up the...
  13. Replies
    248
    Views
    13,586

    Re: Zendikar Resurgent spoilers: Eldrazi Need Not Apply

    The issue with Mystic Sanctuary is that you actually need to be getting ahead by more than the card you're putting back on top. Necro'ing a 1-for-1 isn't helpful, and 1-for-1s is all that Delver...
  14. Replies
    248
    Views
    13,586

    Re: Zendikar Resurgent spoilers: Eldrazi Need Not Apply

    Wayward Guide-Beast + Land Tax/Land's Edge burn? Welcome to 2020.
  15. Replies
    248
    Views
    13,586

    Re: Zendikar Resurgent spoilers: Eldrazi Need Not Apply

    Set your life at 1 (youíre the Shadow player), on board you have Shadow and this new guy - your opponent has a Plow that will resolve. It doesnít matter what their life is (1 to 20), you canít kill...
  16. Replies
    313
    Views
    55,194

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    The 2-drop interaction you should care about more is Drown in the Loch, rather than making building decisions based on being good for TITI 2.0. Note the trend of moving up cmcs heavily undermines the...
  17. Replies
    248
    Views
    13,586

    Re: Zendikar Resurgent spoilers: Eldrazi Need Not Apply

    The deck would be UR, but 100% incorrect to add green (the moment you do this Uro, Oko, Klothys, Ice-Fang, Veil, Dreadhorde disappear all the slots). Adding black is okay, and a card like Cling to...
  18. Replies
    313
    Views
    55,194

    Re: [Primer] UB Death's Shadow

    Slower deck, the payoff for Thievesí Guild Enforcer [TGE] would be to spam Drown in the Loch; which is otherwise hard to justify vs Chalice and Vial decks (harder to fill their yard). The issue with...
  19. Replies
    248
    Views
    13,586

    Re: Zendikar Resurgent spoilers: Eldrazi Need Not Apply

    Pssh, forget SFM - now you can use Wishclaw, tutor this guy up, steal back your Wishclaw and tutor up more things. Itís like building your own Squadron Hawk with more toolbox. Absolutely nothing...
  20. Replies
    248
    Views
    13,586

    Re: Zendikar Resurgent spoilers: Eldrazi Need Not Apply

    Ah that makes more sense.
  21. Replies
    248
    Views
    13,586

    Re: Zendikar Resurgent spoilers: Eldrazi Need Not Apply

    Taking away up-front additional cost of sacrificing a land is, by itself, enough of a change to Harrow. They're missing steps here, you go from Harrow to Roiling Regrowth to sorcery speed Roiling...
  22. Replies
    248
    Views
    13,586

    Re: Zendikar Resurgent spoilers: Eldrazi Need Not Apply

    Copies are not cast, so you're all-in on casting a 2 drop before they are able to deploy a sufficient amount of 0-drop artifacts.
  23. Replies
    248
    Views
    13,586

    Re: Zendikar Resurgent spoilers: Eldrazi Need Not Apply

    I'm thinking that I'd rather cast Entreat from hand and have option to only spend 5 for a single 4/4 (when it's not being cast off miracle cost).
  24. Thread: [Primer/Deck] Burn

    by Fox
    Replies
    1,720
    Views
    437,973

    Re: [Primer/Deck] Burn

    Don't think this ends well for you when you try to finish people with Fireblast. This enchant would be more consistent with a Delver deck that wanted to both not play Dreadhorde and simultaneously...
  25. Replies
    248
    Views
    13,586

    Re: Zendikar Resurgent spoilers: Eldrazi Need Not Apply

    Any anti-Goyf [Nighthawk Scav] needs a guarantee vs Goyf when you're 1 mana more expensive. Uro is still the better anti-Goyf with built-in value. Not sure you want to enter this card in a format...
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4