Search:

I for my part will not go and play a Game I no longer can win because the last time some one has beaten a Computer in chess is long gone and playing aagem without a chance of winning is
not that...

When people finaly accept that lamenting over things they dislike does not change anything and instead focus on things they can change.
So never until humanity or Magic as game creases to exist

To be fair people are calling for such cards because they are to lazy to think of ways to deal with them. A DDT ban is not justified and all the haters are just people who have given up on the...

Thank God that this is not YugiOh the game which advocates the when enough people play something wrong it becomes right rule.

No one will ban Dig as long as it is legal in T2. You see if it is not to strong for their prime format it can´t be to strong for
the format were a high powerlevel is the selling point of the same...

Hello,



You forgot to mention that most of the remaining decks in the top 8 were non Blue decks. So actually there was also Burn, Mud and Junk in the top 8.

As a result there were to Bug...

A btw since you broad it up. Force is necassary against combo as are other control elements. You can see this
when you look in a totaly different game called Legends of the five Rings. This game is...

What he displays let me think otherwise. If he really is the mind behin DNT he should know that blue isn´t as opressive as he says because his deck is beating the shell time and time again. He should...

I see your argumentation after this but that Zoo died was not the fault of Terminus or the blue shell. What killed Zoo was the printing of better avasive creatures like delver, which are easier to...

How can you first argue against banning cantrips and blue powerspells and than post this



in the next sentance and agrueing activly against your first point to quit from trying to ban cantrips...

This would be easier if you actually had any valid argument I can respond too. But a the moment it looks more like that you are resorting to insult and ignorance not even trying to find an argument...

Wait some people can write all the wrong stuff they want and when I exaggerte 1 fact to reinforce myy point all tell that Iam wrong.
this sound really like an discussion were people just don´t want...

Ah yes. I expected insults like this because you display your lack of arguments with it. I, from my point of view, am more the logical type which shoudl explain why I prefer mathamatical facts above...

Really? Ok you play a fetchland because they decrease the land count in your deck by 2 not 1 if you draw 1. The reason is that
they take out a land in addtion to themself when you use the land....

Ok lets go trough this one by one to look why consitency is the only thing you want besides a good power/cost relation of your threats.

First we look what you want when you build a deck. You want...

Wait what. You really concider delver a problem. Cool because that is what I also think. The problem with the current blue shell is that we have something we should not have in our color and that is...

I can see why you quit Magic.
No what I said is if we ban the most powerfull spell blue will not get hurt so hard as you assume. It will harldy change anything but the cantrips which are played. ...

I get a bear which is worth of thinking to add him to my deck because e actually becomes usefull. Ok jokes aside yes he is still on par with the other bears in terms of attack and defend. He is...

The opposite is the case. I get that only win percentages matter. What I claim is that my win percentage is higher because I can execute my plan on a more consistent basis than decks with lower...

Right.



Nope as Echelon said we are discussing cards which actually draw addtional cards or replace themself. You could argue that Vault becomes better as soon as you get a draw effect to...

People only seem arrgogant if you don´t have the abilities to understand them.
Increasing my odds is exactly what it should do. The goal is increasing my odds to the critical point were the...

Wow just wow. You thinking I am not able to understand math and but draw all the wrong conlcusions. You are right that what I get varies less because it comes from a smaller range of possibilities....

The better deck is the deck with more concistency and yes it will win in the long run because it is statisticly better than that without consistency. The reason is that increased consitency means...

They actually are something superior because they increase consitency. In the long run the more consitent deck will win more often than the least consitent deck. This means they are better for great...

I don´t deny this. But for the evaluation if banning brainstorm will weaken the blue shell to the point were non blue strategies without splash or Top are even in the Chances to win it doesn´t...