My point was not to support or not to support a banning decision.
Type: Posts; User: LOurs
My point was not to support or not to support a banning decision.
tinker doesnt need a deck full built around it : 2/3 tinker (or even only 1), appropriate number of artifacts (such as land artifact, sensei and other easly playable & cheap artifact) and 1 win con...
I wont bet on that.
the reason S&T could be considered as borderline nowadays is that it allows you to draw 7/14 instantaneously whatever your opponent put in play with S&T except needle effect....
anyone who's comparing tinker to show&tell in term of power raw probably never ran tinker once
Even if S&T maybe needs to be fixed at some point due to recent releases, tinker is a uber-unfair card...
I'm european, I love SotF and this is a pretty nice story but this just isnt true, satistics easly show you're wrong, including with european tournaments results. Let's be realistic : a tutor engine...
the results of tests are valuable when the reader has all the informations to appreciate the test. If the debate is around competitive playability, and i think it is, so only tests at a competitive...
Imo, whatever the number of test already done at the moment, it is clearly not enough to get a clear opinion about the card.
This is really really too early right now to argue that the card is good...
The banning of misstep was not a sign, it was only a mistake. If they did it to "give modern an identity (read:make aggro decks good)", they just completly failed to. Modern is a pure combo format at...