Search:

Type: Posts; User: UnOrthodox Bird

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    1,943
    Views
    591,195

    Re: Ruby Storm

    Fiery Confluence was not a card I ever pictured being good when I first saw it. Then I saw it played in Red Stompy and thought "Hm, yeah, this card is okay". Then I played it in UR Ruby Storm last...
  2. Replies
    1,943
    Views
    591,195

    Re: Ruby Storm

    I disagree, in that aggressive openers with wheel or AoI are made better with LED. It just flat out produces the most mana. At the same, when you chain 2-3 AoI and all your castables are in exile,...
  3. Replies
    1,943
    Views
    591,195

    Re: Ruby Storm

    Figured I would type up my latest weekly legacy at my lgs.

    3 Rounds, so nothing too exciting, but I went 3-0, (6-1 in matches).

    My list:

    Sorcery (23)

    4x Act on Impulse
    4x Burning...
  4. Replies
    1,943
    Views
    591,195

    Re: Ruby Storm

    I figured as much, and with the recent jump in LED prices, I totally understand. Thanks for the clarification.
  5. Replies
    1,943
    Views
    591,195

    Re: Ruby Storm

    I'm not convinced playing the deck without LED is the best option, especially with 3x maindeck Past in Flames. Noting that you have Crystal Veins, is the lack of LED a budget option or do you feel...
  6. Replies
    1,943
    Views
    591,195

    Re: Ruby Storm

    Personally, I would stick with Cave-In. Obviously you have the bolt/ascension thing going on and usually want to hit face, but bolt for leo is pretty good. Keep your sweeper.
Results 1 to 6 of 6