Search:

Type: Posts; User: GoldenCid

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Not to mention that Beast Within makes our mana base more fragile...
  2. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Vindicate demands tapping as well as EE. That was my reasoning. Vindicates doesn't ask us a "fragile" mana base with a 4th color to deal with pw!
    I'm not saying that EE is not needed off course.
  3. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I'd Love try Vindicate in the deck as a 2 of. Some time ago i'd tried it and i liked. Nowadays does it worth?
  4. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Mmmm...that counterspell in the side looks awful...if it were pierce...ok but counterspell?
  5. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I liked your list very much! The only change i suggest is cutting 1 CS for 1 Path to exile! :)
  6. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Running FOF and Jce togehter sound good, indeed. I was thinking about that for a long time, so i cut 2 vindicate and the decree to incluye 2 FOF:

    4 Standstill
    4 Force of Will
    3 Counterspell
    3...
  7. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Did anybody metion that jace can win games by himself???
  8. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    In the last posts i noticed in the list you share that yuo're running just 1 PW for the win...elspeth or jace but not both? What is this due to??
  9. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Glad to read that. Anyway i was referring of running 3 EE istead running 2 Vindicate. For example 3 EE + something.
    But if you look solid (i look it so) it's ok for me.
  10. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Vindicate is great! But im not sure if run it MD! Is this configuration of permanent manegment right??

    2 EE
    2 Vindicate
    2 Jace TMS
    2 Wrath
    4 StP
    2 PtE
    1 Humility
  11. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Thx mana drain for your comments. I like the list you propose except for that i, personally, prefer a UWx list: UWr or UWb not UWrb. I think that UWb version has more options for the side: Extirpate,...
  12. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Hey guys!! I'm thinking on turning my UWb configuration to UWr that you sugest. Take a look to my list and if you can tell me the changes to make it red:

    // Lands
    1 [TSP] Academy Ruins
    4...
  13. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Congrats!!! So you run UWr configuration???
  14. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Leaving a side, for a while, Elspeth 2.0: Has anybody tested Ghastly Demise as a 2 off? It would be in replace of PtE. I dislike the land drop that it gives to oponent. Off course i'm talking about...
  15. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    My bad.
    He answered your question some post above...

    @Felidae: i hope my calculations aren't wrong but did you post a 61 cards list??
  16. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    @Felidae: Dragon and crucible together in the same list?? Nice, but why??
  17. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Some points about this two cards...Crucible needs 3 lands to be cast while Dragon will give you, for sure, your 3rd land. Once put in the yard, dragon looses some utility due it "buyback" cost. With...
  18. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Could a crucible make this job intead dragon??
  19. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Sorry, but what is vindicate exactly for here??
  20. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    Could you be especific with your mana base?
  21. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I couldn't say it better! I run a 2x FoF 1 x Jace!
  22. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I liked this list, very "classic one". But what about side?? And...Why no jace 2.0 nor 1 copy??
  23. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    It's indeed strong. I run 3 copies. It's a good second turn (1st of yours) full counter. And in many matches could be determinant. It's not necesary to list up what it counters...
    Off course in a...
  24. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I love vindicates. Now that i got 1 Jace 2.0 + 1 Karakas to deal with iona, i think that i cut probably my wishes for 2 vindicates + 1 Stanstill.
    I hope to have enought blue cards to set on fow.
  25. Replies
    5,563
    Views
    1,372,569

    Re: [Deck] UW(x) Landstill

    I play a 3/3 split of CB and spell snare and it's cool...
Results 1 to 25 of 64
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3