Search:

Type: Posts; User: now

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Replies
    31
    Views
    17,662

    So is this forum officially dead?

    Hi!

    So what’s going on? Not even the B/R thread is active anymore. Is everyone on Discord now, or what?
  2. Thread: [DTB] U/R Delver

    by now
    Replies
    875
    Views
    377,866

    Re: [Primer] U/R Delver

    Kari Zev goes 5–0?
  3. Replies
    2,928
    Views
    1,054,589

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Anyone see the list that went 5–2 with 2 Tarfire main and 3 Cindervines and 2 Entrancing Melody in the sideboard?

    I don’t get Entrancing Melody and I wonder if you really want 4 red blast effects,...
  4. Thread: [DTB] U/R Delver

    by now
    Replies
    875
    Views
    377,866

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Why is Niv-Magus Elemental lists doing so well, currently? Is the combo with (3) Flusterstorms really that strong? I can’t see how this old new technology is actually working.
  5. Thread: [DTB] U/R Delver

    by now
    Replies
    875
    Views
    377,866

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Vapor Snag, Seal of Removal, or Alpine Moon in the sideboard against Depths? Vapor Snag is of course usable against other decks as well and causes loss of life. Seal of Removal is better against...
  6. Replies
    490
    Views
    172,004

    Re: Magic - the Cheatering

    One should also remember that though he for once actually admitted to cheating, he only confessed to the instances that were all obvious cases of cheating. There was no discussion of the constant...
  7. Replies
    2,928
    Views
    1,054,589

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Aaand we’re back!
  8. Re: [Official] Bitching About Prices, Buyouts and Reprints Thread

    The point Sullivan is trying to make isn’t really a point to be made. He’s actually just describing the exact problem that we have with the Reserved List. It limits the playability of the Legacy...
  9. Replies
    23,541
    Views
    5,980,235

    Sticky: Poll: Re: All B/R update speculation.

    I’m glad that there are actually a few comments in here that are a bit nuanced and thought through. I’m also glad that this is coming from one of the few players that are actually experimenting in...
  10. Replies
    2,928
    Views
    1,054,589

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Why do we need a second place to discuss what we’re already discussing here?
  11. Replies
    2,928
    Views
    1,054,589

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Thanks! I was looking in all the wrong places.
  12. Replies
    2,928
    Views
    1,054,589

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Sorry, I’m probably missing something obvious here, but the list linked to at MTGGoldfish doesn’t align with the changes you mention. What list are your referring to?
  13. Replies
    23,541
    Views
    5,980,235

    Sticky: Poll: Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Coverage of the GP was not only painful because of rather poor, well, coverage, but (what felt like) having to see at least one Deathrite Shaman in play at any given point gets kind of boring after a...
  14. Replies
    31
    Views
    15,677

    Re: GP Seattle Top 64 Decks

    Given coverage’s naming scheme, I feel like I’m missing a lot of “4-c control” here. I mean, any deck playing deathrite and blue is “4-c control”, right?
  15. Replies
    2,928
    Views
    1,054,589

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    I’d rather play Urza’s Bauble than Gitaxian Probe. It at least feeds Tarmogoyf with a less common card type…
  16. Replies
    23,541
    Views
    5,980,235

    Sticky: Poll: Re: All B/R update speculation.

    Would you please elaborate? What would we be seeing in their stead? It seems a bit too easy to say “all these decks that use the best cards are keeping all the other decks out” without elaborating...
  17. Replies
    2,928
    Views
    1,054,589

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    So? The meta is hardly the same as it was in 2012.
  18. Replies
    2,928
    Views
    1,054,589

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    I think you need to explain a bit more about the “no stifles” part of your deck. :cry:
  19. Replies
    2,928
    Views
    1,054,589

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Any thoughts on what Fatal Push will do to RUG? More True-Name Nemesis, less Tarmogoyf?
  20. Replies
    2,928
    Views
    1,054,589

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    What’s your reasoning for choosing Gitaxian Probe over, say, Spell Pierce?
  21. Replies
    2,928
    Views
    1,054,589

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Isn’t this sort of what The Source is for?
  22. Replies
    2,928
    Views
    1,054,589

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    But then why would you even need to Stifle it in the first place? (That is, why wouldn’t it be enough to simply Wasteland it?)
  23. Replies
    19,119
    Views
    7,640,724

    Re: [DO NOT TRY TO SELL IN HERE] Pimp Legacy Decks

    Care to explain the Dazes in the sideboard?
  24. Replies
    2,928
    Views
    1,054,589

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Also known as “the 59-card main deck special”.
  25. Thread: [Deck] U/R Delver

    by now
    Replies
    2,374
    Views
    763,404

    Re: [Deck] U/R Delver

    Interesting. What’d you replace it with? How did Stormchaser Mage do?
Results 1 to 25 of 53
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3