Yeah, this looks reasonable, because the one ET may find any other necessary card in case of emergency.
Type: Posts; User: Bed Decks Palyer
Yeah, this looks reasonable, because the one ET may find any other necessary card in case of emergency.
sry for a dp
After some more testing I'm fairly positive that the whole Sigil/Ascension dilemma is pointless. Because both cards I pointless. I never really won with either, and 99 % of times I go...
Well, Sigil works totally different than Ascension and there could be a mini-article about the differencies in applications of both.
I mean, it shouldn't be completely unreasonable to avoid life...
I don't think that it's powerful enough. What would you cut for it? How many of them you'd play? It doesn't look like an ET/Grove target, but you definitely won't be playing 3+ of them.
The only...
Thanks. I played quite a lot against Elves and I already realized this points.Amazing experience. Makes me wonder that Elves seem even better deck than Tress. Sad, sad day for humanity.
Should I...
However I still missed the interrupts part so our score is 1:1. :smile:
So I've thrown away the StPs and try Rings. Not only they answer many more cards, but they also cantrip (sometimes) and feed...
Oops, I missed the instants only part, I saw another word ("interrupt") and made a brain fart by imagining sorcery, because "there's nothing like interrupts in MtG, right?".
However I don't get...
In the Eye of Chaos is really pretty. 9 mana Ancestrals are far less impressive.
This is what I'm tinkering with:
Qty Name
1 Plains
4 Windswept Heath
1 Savannah
1 Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx...
Dihensoeur, it's unreasonable to add non-enchantments to your deck. Even if it improves combo mu, at what cost? Do you really plan to play Duress instead of WG on trun1 against unknown opponent? What...