Search:

Wizards is making a point about the historical nature of the Conquistadors—they're bleeding everything dry literally, in Ixalan, as well as metaphorically.

That makes a lot of sense from a sportsmanship perspective, but it definitely undercuts an important element of the game. I guess it's nice they're making it harder for people to win off the back of...

That exact page popped into my head, too.

I was really hoping there'd be some awesome red dinosaurs so people could rebuild Dragon Stompy and call it "Jurassic Park." No dice, I guess.

Just chiming in to say that one piece of good news this spoiler season is that "Skulduggery" is now a card.

A terrible card, but the name tricks you into thinking it might be good. And that . . ....

I think Wizards was testing the waters to see how many people would tilt out over their printing an unplayable version of a better card simply because of its color. That, and they wanted to showcase...

If this isn't the right place for this question, I'll gladly move on and ask it elsewhere.

I might be the only person who cares, but is it me, or is the tone of this set really jarring? We went...

I sense a fellow classicist/antiquity enthusiast.

There's a big difference between pirates as a feature and "Pirates, PIIIIRATES!"

Still no goddamned Return to Sarpadian Empires.

Pirates, PIIIIIIIRATES! Fuck this game.