Page 77 of 77 FirstFirst ... 27677374757677
Results 1,521 to 1,531 of 1531

Thread: [DTW] Bant Survival

  1. #1521
    Survivalist
    Waikiki's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Netherlands
    Posts

    398

    Re: [DTW] Bant Survival

    Well they did the same thing with sensei top which is still here ;)

  2. #1522
    Cabal Therapist
    Kuma's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Akron, OH
    Posts

    968

    Re: [DTW] Bant Survival

    *sigh*

    God damn it.

    One of the many fair decks that has become a casualty of Vengevine.

    Thanks, Bant Survival. It was one hell of a year.
    Quote Originally Posted by Skeggi View Post
    How would Nitewolf have said this?... P_R went over the line. But it was about naming cats. Also, Anus Mittens is a good name for a cat.
    Quote Originally Posted by MMogg View Post
    "Casual sex, NO Touching/Licking/Sucking/Groping/Fondling/Riding/Tickling/Binding/Quitters/Italians. Play Fast, Be Polite, Have Fun."

    Sure as hell sounds like fun.

  3. #1523
    Site Contributor
    Esper3k's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2008
    Location

    Houston, TX
    Posts

    2,057

    Re: [DTW] Bant Survival

    Yeah, I played it again this weekend because I wanted to take it for one last spin before Survival got banned.

    Sadly, I'm thinking my Loyal Retainers just plummeted in value :(

  4. #1524
    Survivalist
    Waikiki's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Netherlands
    Posts

    398

    Re: [DTW] Bant Survival

    Rip

  5. #1525
    Plays green decks
    Jak's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    Portland
    Posts

    2,184

    Re: [DTW] Bant Survival

    And I just finished the primer!

    R.I.P. One of the best decks I have ever had the chance to play. Won me more games than ever and I had a blast in everyone of them.

  6. #1526
    Salt of the earth

    Join Date

    May 2009
    Location

    Canada
    Posts

    4,685

    Re: [DTW] Bant Survival

    I haven't checked the news, but I'm assuming from these posts, Survival is dead.

    Well, once again, the DCI has prematurely acted. Huzzah... *sarcasm* My favourite and first deck in Type 1.5 has finally been killed. It's been a good 10 years, Survival. RIP.

    -Matt

  7. #1527
    Vintage

    Join Date

    Apr 2005
    Location

    West Coast Degeneracy
    Posts

    5,135

    Re: [DTW] Bant Survival

    Big question now: is Fauna Shaman viable in place of Survival?

    Obviously it's more vulnerable, but is it still workable?
    West side
    Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
    * Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
    My Legacy stream
    My MTG Blog - Work in progress

  8. #1528
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Finland
    Posts

    798

    Re: [DTW] Bant Survival

    Quote Originally Posted by rukcus View Post
    Big question now: is Fauna Shaman viable in place of Survival?

    Obviously it's more vulnerable, but is it still workable?
    I see the need of dropping majority of the targets if you start using Shaman since landing one doesn't guarantee any activations from it. I would try it with only Iona + Retainers and see how it goes. While resolving a survival was huge, resolving a shaman is lousy, clunky and slow. I still think that Iona might be good enough to try at least. Most likely the deck will either change drastically or just cease to exist now.
    Some of my friends sell records,
    some of my friends sell drugs.

  9. #1529

    Re: [DTW] Bant Survival

    I play a version of this with fauna shaman, and it has been treating me well online, Hopo is right, targets go down, iona plan works a lot of the time. I end up using fauna shaman as bait 3/4 the time against control, the base of the deck is pretty strong (although i dont run war monk, instead using sovereigns, and eldrazi conscription as a 3rd win condition). Fauna shaman is clunky but works great as bait IMO.
    A snail is just a slug with a shell to slow it down more.

  10. #1530
    Survivalist
    Waikiki's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Netherlands
    Posts

    398

    Re: [DTW] Bant Survival

    your really relying on a 6 mana win condition ?

    Also if we want to try to play without survival this would be what im guessing for:

    // Lands
    3 [A] Tropical Island
    4 [ZEN] Misty Rainforest
    1 [ON] Flooded Strand
    4 [ON] Windswept Heath
    1 [A] Savannah
    1 [A] Tundra
    2 [UG] Forest
    1 [UG] Island
    1 [UG] Plains

    // Creatures
    4 [M11] Fauna Shaman
    3 [MOR] Vendilion Clique
    2 [ARB] Qasali Pridemage
    4 [FUT] Tarmogoyf
    1 [ALA] Rhox War Monk
    4 [CFX] Noble Hierarch
    1 [DIS] Trygon Predator
    1 [ALA] Rafiq of the Many
    1 [LRW] Sower of Temptation
    2 [WWK] Stoneforge Mystic

    // Spells
    4 [A] Swords to Plowshares
    2 [DIS] Spell Snare
    3 [M10] Ponder
    4 [MM] Brainstorm
    4 [AL] Force of Will
    1 [BOK] Umezawa's Jitte
    1 [DS] Sword of Fire and Ice

    Perhaps some jaces could be in there. I dont know if we would like to run squee.

  11. #1531
    Member

    Join Date

    Nov 2007
    Location

    Finland
    Posts

    798

    Re: [DTW] Bant Survival

    I wouldn't feel comfortable having Squee in my deck without survival. I can take one Iona, but that's it when it comes to tutorable targets.
    As Rafiq is really powerful, how about some more of them? Obviously the deck starts to look like bant aggro at that point, but it never was too far away from it anyway. I don't even know if it's worth the effort to try to make shamans work. They are by far the worst creatures in the deck in my opinion. Iona is still crazy good at times, though. Go figure.
    Some of my friends sell records,
    some of my friends sell drugs.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)