Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 59 of 59

Thread: [The Source] Tournaments

  1. #41
    ლ(ಠ_ಠლ)
    4eak's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2007
    Posts

    1,311

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    A banned list tourney sounds like what most people want. Would it be possible to add a few more banned cards on that unbanned list, just for a bit more diversity? I don't want to see just 20 WGD decks.

    - Land Tax
    - Illusionary Mask
    - Dream Halls
    - Earthcraft
    - Entomb
    - Worldgorger's Dragon


    What about:

    -Metalworker
    -Mind Twist
    -Hermit Druid
    -Time Spiral
    -one more? (Skullclamp or Fastbond or Gush maybe?)

    When I look at just the top list, I only see WGD and perhaps another Entomb deck being viably made/tweaked in the allotted time to build a deck before the tourney (that is to say: the other cards might be breakable, but I don't think they would be for this tournament). So, perhaps we could add just a few more decent cards, or would that be too much?




    peace,
    4eak

  2. #42

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    - Land Tax
    - Illusionary Mask
    - Dream Halls
    - Earthcraft
    - Entomb
    - Worldgorger's Dragon
    how about
    - Entomb or Dragon
    + Black Vise
    + Mind Twist

    upd
    4eak, Druid and Time Spiral seem ok too. maybe even Grim Monolith and Frantic Search. but Metalworker, Clamp, Fastbond and Gush are absolutely broken.

  3. #43
    ლ(ಠ_ಠლ)
    4eak's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2007
    Posts

    1,311

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    4eak, Druid and Time Spiral seem ok too. maybe even Grim Monolith and Frantic Search. but Metalworker, Clamp, Fastbond and Gush are absolutely broken.
    You surprise me with Frantic Search (has been amazing in Solidarity during my testing). Would be fun to see it on the field!

    I'm actually not convinced some of those are really broken though. Metalworker and Fastbond in particular have been safe enough in my testing. They can be a part of good decks, but they haven't been anywhere near format warping (e.g. Affinity in T2).

    It seems like this would be a decent place to test assertions of brokenness for many of these cards. If you think they're really broken, then build a deck around them and play it at the tournament, eh?

    Either way is fine with me though; I was just offering a suggestion.




    peace,
    4eak
    Last edited by 4eak; 06-07-2009 at 01:09 PM.

  4. #44

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    Pauper would be really fun...

  5. #45

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    Quote Originally Posted by phoenix33 View Post
    Forbiddian may have deserved the win based on his opponent not acting enough, however, his only post was this, from which C_C could only tell that both players had been in contact. Had he posted again about the situation, he may have got the win he deserved. Obviously you should have the win if the opponent PMs you once and disappears, but if you don't tell the TO what's happened, how are they going to know?

    Also, I'd play in IBA's suggested tourney.
    I PM'd the TO and he said I "was fine and just needed to wait." I also posted in the thread. But then it turns out that I wasn't fine. Maybe he forgot.

    I'd be down for this tournament. A draw and then the subsequent mulligan into a bunch of equipment game 1, drawing 10 lands in 13 cards, and then also 1 aether vial (2 Burrenton forge tenders, and he was zoo and got mostly green that game) means I'm probably out of top 8. I could go WWWW and then probably still not make it on tie breaks.

    To address people who have the possibility of top 8ing, why not just run the tournament, and then there will be fewer people due to this, and then it will end sooner, probably in time for the MTGSal tournament to end and then we can hold another one. Or you can play two in parallel. Unless you have a crazy psycho job this summer or are going to take a really long vacation, that should be pretty manageable.

  6. #46
    (' ' '\( 0 ,o)/''')
    TheInfamousBearAssassin's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2004
    Location

    Northern Virginia
    Posts

    6,627

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    - Land Tax
    - Illusionary Mask
    - Dream Halls
    - Earthcraft
    - Entomb
    - Worldgorger's Dragon
    - Hermit Druid
    - Mind Twist
    - Mana Drain
    - Black Vise

    I'm not sure all those cards would ever come off the list, but it'd be interesting without being degenerate. At least on MWS Mana Drain's cost isn't an issue.

    We could add Grim Monolith in place of Land Tax, it seems marginally less terrible.
    For my confessions, they burned me with fire/
    And found I was for endurance made

  7. #47

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    I'd participate if this were to happen.

    Pretty nifty ideas.

  8. #48

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    I too would enjoy some non-MWS-head-bashing competition!

  9. #49
    Don't ping the hydra
    DrJones's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Spain
    Posts

    107,480

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    I think these "unban something" ideas becomes less useful as the list increases, specially IBA's last suggestion, which increases tenfold the "swinginess" of the format for no purpose other than lulz. Mana Drain? Black Vise? Why don't suggest also Strip Mine and Library of Alexandria? Those cards all have in common that win games that should have been lost, and require no skill whatsoever. These don't make games more interesting, they make it more random. You are adding a bunch of cards that have to be answered as soon as they enter play or you lose, and they all require packing a lot of different answer cards in your deck; unless you happen to be blue, in which case you are okay with the general-purpose countermagic that you already played, plus Mana Drain.

    More Swinginess + more fronts to protect + only general answer being countermagic + broken countermagic allowed = very predictable metagame. Now, if blue decks had to actually sacrifice slots to protect from any of those newly introduced cards, like the rest of the field...

    There are also flaws with the concept that haven't been addressed yet: you can't use the tournament to test if the weaker of those cards on the list are unfair or not, because they can (will) be overshadowed by the stronger ones. Moreover, decklists with more than one of the banned cards (Illus Mask + Mana Drain, for example) have almost zero chance of ever being legal, are likelier to make Top 8, and if so, you won't ever know if the unbalance came from one card (Mask) or the other (Drain).

  10. #50
    (' ' '\( 0 ,o)/''')
    TheInfamousBearAssassin's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2004
    Location

    Northern Virginia
    Posts

    6,627

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    The problem with any suggestion about unbannings is that very few people actually understand structurally how the game works and how Legacy design works, and thus have an odd idea of which cards would have an impact. For instance, the suggestion that adding Illusionary Mask to a deck increases it's odds of Top 8'ing.
    For my confessions, they burned me with fire/
    And found I was for endurance made

  11. #51
    Don't ping the hydra
    DrJones's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Spain
    Posts

    107,480

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    You know, if only because Illusionary Mask makes your creatures uncounterable in a blue-dominated meta, and also because Roc Hatchling is teh killer. :P

  12. #52
    (' ' '\( 0 ,o)/''')
    TheInfamousBearAssassin's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2004
    Location

    Northern Virginia
    Posts

    6,627

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    Quote Originally Posted by DrJones View Post
    and also because Roc Hatchling is teh killer. :P
    I am defeated!
    For my confessions, they burned me with fire/
    And found I was for endurance made

  13. #53
    The specimen seems to be broken.
    elof's Avatar
    Join Date

    Dec 2008
    Location

    Sweden
    Posts

    396

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    I'm up for almost any type of tournament.
    "Think of all we could learn from it! It's the chance of a lifetime! You must let me have it! It's a magnificent specimen!"

    Scandinavian Master Legacy 2010

    World champion 93/94 2013

  14. #54

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    How about this. You may pick and play 4 of any card on the banned list provided:

    1. It is not Banned or Restricted in Vintage.

    Basically it would be like playing old Type 1.5 but you only get 1 card. So take your 4 Mana Drain, OR your 4 Metalworkers, OR your 4 Grim Monolith.

  15. #55
    I clench my fists and yell "anime" towards an uncaring, absent God
    Nihil Credo's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    59°50'59.11" N, 17°34'55.69" E
    Posts

    4,702

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark_Shakuras View Post
    How about this. You may pick and play 4 of any card on the banned list provided:

    1. It is not Banned or Restricted in Vintage.

    Basically it would be like playing old Type 1.5 but you only get 1 card. So take your 4 Mana Drain, OR your 4 Metalworkers, OR your 4 Grim Monolith.
    That's excessive in my opinion. Between Skullclamp, Oath, and Workshop you would obsolete most of Legacy as we know it.
    YOU'RE GIVING ME A TIME MACHINE IN ORDER TO TREAT MY SLEEP DISORDER.

  16. #56
    (' ' '\( 0 ,o)/''')
    TheInfamousBearAssassin's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2004
    Location

    Northern Virginia
    Posts

    6,627

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    Let's do this;

    Let's say that we want to try three cards being unbanned, as a small number, and then set these parameters;

    We want these cards to be capable of having an impact; they are not the weakest cards on the banned list.

    We want these cards to be balanced; we don't want them to destroy the tournament.

    We want these cards to represent different strategies; we don't want to create a combo tournament.

    We don't want to make blue more powerful than it is; we don't want these cards to be blue.

    We want these cards to be capable of going into more than one deck.

    With that end, I would suggest;

    - Entomb
    - Mind Twist
    - Earthcraft

    As potential unbans for one tournament.
    For my confessions, they burned me with fire/
    And found I was for endurance made

  17. #57
    Plays green decks
    Jak's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    Portland
    Posts

    2,184

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    Quote Originally Posted by TheInfamousBearAssassin View Post
    Let's do this;

    Let's say that we want to try three cards being unbanned, as a small number, and then set these parameters;

    We want these cards to be capable of having an impact; they are not the weakest cards on the banned list.

    We want these cards to be balanced; we don't want them to destroy the tournament.

    We want these cards to represent different strategies; we don't want to create a combo tournament.

    We don't want to make blue more powerful than it is; we don't want these cards to be blue.

    We want these cards to be capable of going into more than one deck.

    With that end, I would suggest;

    - Entomb
    - Mind Twist
    - Earthcraft

    As potential unbans for one tournament.
    Sounds awesome.

  18. #58
    ლ(ಠ_ಠლ)
    4eak's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2007
    Posts

    1,311

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    One more question: Are we required to play a deck that uses the temporarily unbanned cards, or is it completely open and entirely up the player whether or not we use the cards?




    peace,
    4eak

  19. #59
    Hold on! I have a 12/12
    Van Phanel's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    401

    Re: [The Source] Tournaments

    If we do this unban-stuff thingy, I'd suggest Frantic Search.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)