Brainstorm
Force of Will
Lion's Eye Diamond
Counterbalance
Sensei's Divining Top
Tarmogoyf
Phyrexian Dreadnaught
Goblin Lackey
Standstill
Natural Order
Last edited by non-inflammable; 10-24-2017 at 06:23 PM.
I think people want a way to punish the cantrips without doing even more damage to alternate engines. They want a cheap card that is somehow unplayable alongside Brainstorm, powerful enough to actually see play, all while not disputing non-cantrip filtering. It's a hilariously specific niche that I'm not convinced can actually be filled.
Leo just happens to be the worst of both worlds. Well, Notion Thief too but who plays that.
Wow, thanks for reminding me why I have coverage muted 100% of the time. You have to either be wrong on purpose or not understand the concept of "a group" of people to be that stupid.
People complain about things. People on forums (a group of people, no less) can complain about the exact opposite thing at the same time! It doesn't mean that the same people are complaining about both things. They can even both valid complaints, even though they're talking about the same exact thing from 2 different sides! Okay now that we have numbers of people that are more than 1 settled we can take on his next big point.
People can want cards that are good, but not too good to be printed for their format. Something that's playable, but doesn't make it into 6/8 of the top 8, for example. If no good cards are printed, their want is not satisfied. If a card is printed that needs to go in most decks in the format their want is still not satisfied.
You're right, what I meant was that Cook was going to beat you no matter what.
Huh... sounds like scientology...
Let's remember that all sets since Alpha contain cards that are superior to others. It is foolish to suggest that a player's ability on their own is what should determine the outcome of a match. It's also called wishful thinking. A player's ability has only ever been part of the equation.
It is also a positive that a format has decks capable of high performance even when the pilot has low experience. Look at Burn, the concept/execution is simple and the deck is highly affordable. The deck is capable of winning an event even if the pilot has limited experience with the deck or knowledge of the format. The beauty of the game is that a player who has experience with the deck and knowledge of the format is rewarded with opportunities to succeed where the less experienced player would fail. If you can't handle losing, you should reconsider playing competitively.
There will always be a best deck and a best card. There will always be people who play the best deck because they feel it gives them an advantage. Similarly there will always be people that play the deck that is best at beating the best deck, for the same reasons. Lastly there will always be people who play whatever they want because it is what they like, or possibly, because they feel it gives them an advantage. Whining about hypothetical spoiled children that win tournaments is ridiculous.
I love hearing about you talk about what the creators of type 1.5 intended.
Please, tell me more...
That's pretty much exclusively why this thread exists though. The old days are gone, now it's just popcorn and lawn chairs.
But to be fair even back in the days where everyone would have been nice to each other I'd probably still bitch about the MTG commentators. They are so bad it's astounding.
P.Sulli's rant is really just an exercise in how big of a strawman can one angry dude make
"Don't complain that Deathrite makes mana when Lions Eye Diamond Exists, when Ancient Tomb exists."
Yeah man, W O K E argument you got there.
I have a horrible record against Cook lifetime. But realistically, I have horrible stats in Legacy as a whole. But I don't really care about that. I might leave a tournament 1-4, like I did last time, and make the 3 hour drive thinking about what I can change. I might scrub out of a GP on day 1, but you can make damn sure I turn a profit on the trip in just grinders. I'm not into this format because I win or lose. (And I do more losing) I'm not out to play professionally. I play Legacy because I want to. Because this format is where I want to be. And I play what I built, because I built it. That's what I do. I play my shitpile, against other shitpiles. And that's OK with me. It's how I enjoy this game. However, certain things create unenjoyable situations. Like watching my opponent drop Emrakul on t1 because.....fucking junk shit. Like seeing the same god damn 21 cards in almost every damn deck, because....fucking junk shit. I don't care to see that, it cheapens the experience. Its success only enhances its status, and influences more people into adapting "fucking junk shit" into their decks.
No, I don't like the color blue. Blue can die in a fire. A horrible, fiery, RED fire.
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk
Remember that time you left for a few days and your girl stayed behind?
I kept her company.
Time for a hypothetical question: suppose the best engine in Legacy wasn't Xerox but Loam and suppose Loam decks would use all kinds of different wincons in different archetypes, you have a loam combo deck, control deck, tempo deck, aggro deck. Now suppose Loam has a 60+% in representation. How long would it take for Loam to be banned?
It's really easy to fix Legacy, there is just too much blue circle jerking going on to make it happen...
www.theepicstorm.com - Your Source for The Epic Storm - Articles, Reports, Decktech and more!
Join us at Facebook!
Questionable - particularly when you've not listed-off your T1 land. If the land was colorless, Plains, Windswept Heath, Mire, Badlands, Scrubland, etc... then TES should be going for a kill as soon as possible (Tabernacle decks generally betray their identity on turn one). Pretty much every fair, non-Tabernacle, non-FoW deck in legacy hides behind discard or 2-drop "you can't win" cards; it's a pretty poor example for Probe dictating the course of the game.
The more effective way to make this point is to correctly draw the systematic connection between Probe decks and deeper tournament runs on the back of ruling out need to follow a conservative line. There are better reasons to ban Probe than this, but yes, there is a connection between free info converting into free wins.
www.theepicstorm.com - Your Source for The Epic Storm - Articles, Reports, Decktech and more!
Join us at Facebook!
The Mind Harvester in my signature fits Brainstorm and Life from the Loam in the same deck. I haven't updated that thread with my current list in quite a while, but the shell is still basically the same, except I cut the EE/Ruins for Stage/Depths.
This was my pet deck pre-DRS and Shardless Agent and I still have them sleeved up, the primer I wrote was merged under Team America Control:
1 Verdant Catacombs
4 Misty Rainforest
4 Polluted Delta
3 Bayou
2 Tropical Island
4 Underground Sea
4 Wasteland
3 Snapcaster Mage
1 Vendilion Clique
4 Jace, the Mind Sculptor
3 Liliana of the Veil
4 Brainstorm
4 Force of Will
2 Spell Snare
2 Ghastly Demise
1 Counterspell
1 Maelstrom Pulse
2 Ponder
2 Thoughtseize
2 Inquisition of Kozilek
3 Innocent Blood
3 Pernicious Deed
1 Life from the Loam
I was late to adapt Abrupt Decay because it's not a 1-mana removal spell. Someone on this forum was buying Jap foil Decays at $170-$190 for his Storm sideboard. BUG Delver performed well with Abrupt Decay against RUG which led to Canadian's downfall.
I actually ran Brainstorm with Loam in some Slide lists when I was experimenting with Blue. It was just kind of depressing how much better it was than having cycling cards, so I dropped it.
EDIT: Brainstorm + Loam is basically the Legacy version of CAW-Cartel. It's just that with Delver and Angler, you don't really need to mess around with a slow-ish card draw engine when you can just win. DRS ubiquity also somewhat suppresses Loam since it can hit both halves of the Loam engine repeatedly.
This is a pretty sketchy comparison, because Loam is a naturally more narrow card. Loam only gives you CA in terms of lands and graveyard interactions. It is an inherently more limited engine than 1-mana filters, and it supports exactly 2 archetypes - a combo/prison deck and a midrange deck - and that's it.
In order to imagine your scenario, I have to imagine tempo decks and straight combo decks running off Loam. I Also need to imagine a variety of these decks - Tempo decks as varied as U/R, Infect and Grixis; combo decks as varied as Reanimator, Storm, and S&T; midranged decks as varied as Czech and Blade Control; and a variety of rogue decks too - all powered by Loam.
I personally just can't picture Loam supporting that much variety because the card is just not that versatile. So inevitable when I imagine a format with 60% Loam decks, I do not imagine diversity. It's like trying to imagine a diverse format with a variety of play-styles all supported by LED - it doesn't make any sense.
Supremacy 2020 is the modern era game of nuclear brinksmanship! My blog:
https://fieldmarshalshandbook.wordpress.com
You can play Lands.dec in EDH too! My primer:
http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/t...lara-lands-dec
There are currently 1972 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1972 guests)