Brainstorm
Force of Will
Lion's Eye Diamond
Counterbalance
Sensei's Divining Top
Tarmogoyf
Phyrexian Dreadnaught
Goblin Lackey
Standstill
Natural Order
It's not. It's just a response to the argument that taking Miracles down a peg would kill an archetype. Because we have lost archetypes before. So in my view the argument that "If we punish Miracles for being a dominating deck for years we will lose the the true control deck of the format" is hollow.
1. That 1/6th of the field punches well above its weight, which is a proven fact, so amount played ≠ the amount of issues it caused.
2. Banning a card because it's deck is dominate will have knock on effects sure, but when the reason for the action is just, you take it anyway.
If my dad robs you and gets locked up, that will have effects on my family. But that doesn't mean he shouldn't be punished for his actions. Same argument here.
Right, which is exactly why Counterbalance should go.
1. Doesn't invalidate the Miracles archetype.
2. Opens up more diverse ways of combating (arguably) the top deck in the format.
3. Touches basically no other deck.
Terminus is a stupidly good card because of Brainstorm and Top, but it is far more fightable than Counterbalance. I think Terminus is a fine Legacy card. Powerful, very much so, but not format warping. Unfortunately, Counterbalance is format warping, as my theory is that is part of why there is so much BG/X around.
"The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail."
—Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order
The seven cardinal sins of Legacy:
1. Discuss the unbanning ofLand TaxEarthcraft.
2. Argue that banning Force of Will would make the format healthier.
3. Play Brainstorm without Fetchlands.
4. Stifle Standstill.
5. Think that Gaea's Blessing will make you Solidarity-proof.
6. Pass priority after playing Infernal Tutor.
7. Fail to playtest against Nourishing Lich (coZ iT wIlL gEt U!).
At what time (Europe) is the announcement?
If you have evidence presented that Miracles top8s above it representation, please present.
Meanwhile 15% is not overwhelming and the format is diverse.
Not the same at all. The banned list exists to ensure format diversity. Any ban should have a net positive here.
Law and order exists to benefit society, not your family. Locking him up is meant to have a net gain for society as a whole, not your family.
Some people argue that excessive incarceration has a net harm on society. That's the better analogy here.
I can (sadly) accept when a play-style has receded. I cannot get behind engineering this by a ban.
If Goblins gets a new toy, becomes top dog again, but is contained at 15% and is the format's only aggro deck, would you support a debilitating (aggro killing) ban so more midrange decks can be viable?
Supremacy 2020 is the modern era game of nuclear brinksmanship! My blog:
https://fieldmarshalshandbook.wordpress.com
You can play Lands.dec in EDH too! My primer:
http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/t...lara-lands-dec
I vote terminus. I think Julian said it best on Leaving a Legacy podcast. Counter Top was a powerful combo for years, but before the printing of Avacyn was basically dead because the format managed it, and that was before decay and cavern existed. The thing that brought it back and put it over the top currently in some people's eyes now was the 1 mana get out of jail free card. Plus losing counter balance means you don't really have any similar type effect. It's a fairly unique card. Losing terminus means you simply must compromise and run a slightly higher costed wrath effect, but there are many terminus alternatives. They just happen to be fairly costed
Supremacy 2020 is the modern era game of nuclear brinksmanship! My blog:
https://fieldmarshalshandbook.wordpress.com
You can play Lands.dec in EDH too! My primer:
http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/t...lara-lands-dec
Let's be real here. You and I have been debating this shit since you joined. Are we really going to agree now? Nothing changes, your views and your arguments don't change. My views and my arguments don't change. What exactly are we achieving here? Your still emotionally clinging to the hope something doesn't get done because you dislike the perceived consequences of the act, not because you can debate the act is not deserved. I just can't dive down this rabbit hole again. It's going to go nowhere and nothing is new here.
If you come up with a new argument let me know. Until then I am done. If for no other reason than simply "This is not changing anything".
Maybe?
There is nothing wrong with being top dog in the format, there is always going to be a best or set of best decks in the format. The problem arises when the top decks aren't being effected by anything in the format. Over the last year we've seen a series of cards with high power levels being printed for Legacy: Leovold, Chandra, Recruiter of the Guard, Prelate, etc but none of these cards have really impacted miracles. It should be pretty telling that the only cards that have successfully dethroned the archetype broke Legacy (Cruise/DTT) with miracles very easily adapting one of the format breaking cards and continuing it's success.
Legacy has such a deep card pool that problems often fix themselves. If goblins becomes a powerhouse in Legacy it's not that hard to combat. People are going to start sleeving up more and more board wipes, engineered plagues and the like to combat the deck. I think that you roughly argue the same for most archetypes in Legacy. Miracles is a different beast in and of itself. It rarely folds to a single angle of attack, it's naturally immune from certain types of hate and can completely tailor it's sideboard to attack hate cards without really effecting the construction of the deck or how it operates.
I'm also not sure where this meme of everyone wanting a midrange format is coming from. Can we stop comparing modern to Legacy? They're very different formats.
www.theepicstorm.com - Your Source for The Epic Storm - Articles, Reports, Decktech and more!
Join us at Facebook!
I honestly don't like anything being banned from miracle that's not BS for the simple reason that miracle being the best deck in the format and being a counterbalance+ force deck does a lot to keep stupid combo decks at bay. If top or counterbalance or anything else get axed and we lose the primary safety valve of the format you could end up with a format where combo is a significant presence of the meta, and let's be frank, a big part of the appeal of legacy is being able to play a lot of different janky decks with the assumption that you are bad vs combo but won't play a lot against it. Banning BS on the other hand would hit both miracle AND most combo lists at the same time (exception for belcher/oops i guess which are zzz).
It also feel like "ban everything but necro". The card is a draw 3 that enable instant speed W wrath + recursion hoser and instant speed 3WW i win the game on untap.
Alternatively, ban petal and unban bargain and search. Make the format more friendly for non-blue making non-force answers to combo better.
Let's all just be realistic and recognize there is almost no chance anything happens in any case...
"The Ancients teach us that if we can but last, we shall prevail."
—Kaysa, Elder Druid of the Juniper Order
It's funny how people tend to see midrange as "non-control".
I'm not sure why you (and a few others it seems) feel like if miracles lost counter balance that storm and other fast combo would overrun the format. Tempo strategies that are currently pretty limited by miracles generally have very positive match ups against combo as well as hate bear decks like maverick can also have good combo match ups. I just don't see why we think that the format needs counter balance to police the format when there's a million ways to fight various combo decks
This thread could just as well be focused on speculating if Legacy is even acknowledged in the Wizards update, and if Legacy is a supported format period in a few years time.
My bet is that they have a full article disposition on how Vintage is tentatively okay right now or something is restricted. Modern gets a one paragraph banning, Standard and Pauper no changes. Legacy isn't mentioned.
Look at the glassdoor reviews on Wizards. The company is a good ol boys club from the top on down, obscenely political and back stabby, and incredibly inbred with pro-tour players as developers and no new blood or changes in the pipelines. They had employees go on Glassdoor last year to leave fake positive reviews to try and recruit better. The Randy Beuhler moron or whatever has an in to the B&R people, which is why Vintage is getting attention so that his Vintage Super League can be relevant. Someone at the top hates Legacy and no one will make a push to upset that point of view, or else it's suicide for corporate aspirations.
I'd gladly be horribly wrong.
Midrange elements are things which can easily provide offense or defense (aka, SFM), depending on what the situation calls for. Hard control decks are made of things that are much better suited for defense. In the context of the deck, of course.
Yes, some grindier midrange decks lean more to control than other midrange decks. These are different from hard control decks - and I find it funny that people pretend this distinction doesn't exist!
I'm, not interested in semantics such as whether or not grindy midrange do or don't counts as control. I'm saying control decks that are not also midrange decks add more diversity to a format that already has midrange decks.
None of which show its actual win-rate or measure its success against its representation. Do you have any new arguments?
No, I'm claiming that by virtue of being a unique play-style, Miracles adds more diversity than it subtracts (by vritue of being 15% of top8s). That simple. Having a top deck is only bad if it hurts diversity. enough tier one decks have a +ve Miracles match that it is contained - even if it is top dog.
You might disagree, but I am not being emotional beyond a desire for diversity of play-styles.
Incidentally, we've been arguing about the banned list since before I joined. Why break tradition?
Okay, you get a pass!
I'd love to see a hard control deck! Or MUC.
Supremacy 2020 is the modern era game of nuclear brinksmanship! My blog:
https://fieldmarshalshandbook.wordpress.com
You can play Lands.dec in EDH too! My primer:
http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/t...lara-lands-dec
I do get your point of wanting a "hard control" deck, but that was not my point. The point I made was about disregarding "midrange" as control decks per se, which happened in this thread. Funnily enough, you trying to explain the term and then "hard control" proves that point, especially if you look at how Miracles incorporated Mentor.
Exactly ^^
Mentor Miracles (the minority of lists) is "softer" control than other Miracles lists. Ponder and Legends Miracles are definitely hard control though.
Midrange/control is a thing, but it's exactly that - midrange/control. I don't like for all the non-combo decks to be balanced mixes of aggressive and controlling elements. That's not diversity.
I never said hard control needs to be . Please don't ascribe that to me. It's just that our only such deck happens to be .
Supremacy 2020 is the modern era game of nuclear brinksmanship! My blog:
https://fieldmarshalshandbook.wordpress.com
You can play Lands.dec in EDH too! My primer:
http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/t...lara-lands-dec
There are currently 2001 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2001 guests)