Page 116 of 131 FirstFirst ... 1666106112113114115116117118119120126 ... LastLast
Results 2,301 to 2,320 of 2609

Thread: [Deck] Bant

  1. #2301
    Site Contributor
    Whitefaces's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2013
    Location

    London
    Posts

    1,378

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    Quote Originally Posted by limbo View Post
    Indeed, though I always found that equipment is highly protective in those situations making us slightly more resilient than the average creature deck.
    True true, maybe I'm overreacting. We can always Gideon ultimate too
    Quote Originally Posted by CutthroatCasual View Post
    Storm was killed by Leovold
    Quote Originally Posted by LegacyIsAnEternalFormat View Post
    The power of blue is overrated...I personally play Jund and I consistently top 4 FNMs with it.

  2. #2302
    Etherium is limited. Innovation is not.
    Hanni's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Columbus, OH
    Posts

    2,818

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    Zealous Persecution in response to a Zealous Persecution? lol...
    Sligh
    Echo Stompy
    /r Miracle Intuition
    Yorion's Intuition
    5c Hollow Vine

    Quote Originally Posted by MMogg View Post
    In porn terms, Zoo has a 11" shlong and an impressive money shot, but it's over in 4 minutes, whereas Landstill is a good 8" and can go for 30 minutes.

  3. #2303
    Member
    Manipulato's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2013
    Location

    Kempten, Germany
    Posts

    467

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    Hey guys,
    I'm tinkering about playing this deck in the new meta because I think it's good positioned.

    How would you guys build your 75 now? Could you post your new lists? Would be cool!

    I'm especially interested for the manabase configuration and SB because I think that the MD will not change that much exept for the full 4 Swords instead of a AD /Swords split, right?

    Edit: I'm not 100% sure you guys really want Engineered Plague vs Elves as your #1 hate card tbh. The deck plays quite alot of non-elve dudes (4 Symbiotes/2 Dryad Arbor/1 Scavenging Ooze/2 Behemoth) or x/2's in form of 4 Shaman & 4 Sentinel which dont die to the plague. Other thing is it's more slow at cc3 than Zealous Persecution or similar effects & can be killed by AD or Reclamation Sage out of Green Suns Zenith. A small creature count is already enough to Behemoth us into death...I think cards like Containment Priest/Zealous Persecution/Ethersworn Canonist will be more efficient vs them.
    How do you guys see that?
    Currently playing
    Eldrazi

  4. #2304
    Etherium is limited. Innovation is not.
    Hanni's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Columbus, OH
    Posts

    2,818

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    Quote Originally Posted by Manipulato View Post
    Hey guys,
    I'm tinkering about playing this deck in the new meta because I think it's good positioned.

    How would you guys build your 75 now? Could you post your new lists? Would be cool!

    I'm especially interested for the manabase configuration and SB because I think that the MD will not change that much exept for the full 4 Swords instead of a AD /Swords split, right?
    My list was slightly unconventional to begin with, but I'll keep running the same maindeck, with only minimal changes to my sideboard based on how the meta shifts.

    My list was posted on the previous page.
    Sligh
    Echo Stompy
    /r Miracle Intuition
    Yorion's Intuition
    5c Hollow Vine

    Quote Originally Posted by MMogg View Post
    In porn terms, Zoo has a 11" shlong and an impressive money shot, but it's over in 4 minutes, whereas Landstill is a good 8" and can go for 30 minutes.

  5. #2305

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    Quote Originally Posted by Manipulato View Post
    Hey guys,
    I'm tinkering about playing this deck in the new meta because I think it's good positioned.

    How would you guys build your 75 now? Could you post your new lists? Would be cool!

    I'm especially interested for the manabase configuration and SB because I think that the MD will not change that much exept for the full 4 Swords instead of a AD /Swords split, right?

    Edit: I'm not 100% sure you guys really want Engineered Plague vs Elves as your #1 hate card tbh. The deck plays quite alot of non-elve dudes (4 Symbiotes/2 Dryad Arbor/1 Scavenging Ooze/2 Behemoth) or x/2's in form of 4 Shaman & 4 Sentinel which dont die to the plague. Other thing is it's more slow at cc3 than Zealous Persecution or similar effects & can be killed by AD or Reclamation Sage out of Green Suns Zenith. A small creature count is already enough to Behemoth us into death...I think cards like Containment Priest/Zealous Persecution/Ethersworn Canonist will be more efficient vs them.
    How do you guys see that?
    I am planning on playing plague in addition to the mentioned cards- a lot of the trouble elves can get us into are value loops with symb/visionary which plague stops- or dryad arbor quirion ranger blocking loops to stop jitte counters. It also overloads their abrupt decays with jitte/leovold/meddling mage/plague.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  6. #2306
    Etherium is limited. Innovation is not.
    Hanni's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Columbus, OH
    Posts

    2,818

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    Quote Originally Posted by Manipulato View Post
    Hey guys,
    I'm tinkering about playing this deck in the new meta because I think it's good positioned.

    How would you guys build your 75 now? Could you post your new lists? Would be cool!

    I'm especially interested for the manabase configuration and SB because I think that the MD will not change that much exept for the full 4 Swords instead of a AD /Swords split, right?

    Edit: I'm not 100% sure you guys really want Engineered Plague vs Elves as your #1 hate card tbh. The deck plays quite alot of non-elve dudes (4 Symbiotes/2 Dryad Arbor/1 Scavenging Ooze/2 Behemoth) or x/2's in form of 4 Shaman & 4 Sentinel which dont die to the plague. Other thing is it's more slow at cc3 than Zealous Persecution or similar effects & can be killed by AD or Reclamation Sage out of Green Suns Zenith. A small creature count is already enough to Behemoth us into death...I think cards like Containment Priest/Zealous Persecution/Ethersworn Canonist will be more efficient vs them.
    How do you guys see that?
    Engineered Plague is most certainly the best Elves hate available. The only thing it doesn't kill is Deathrite Shaman, Nettle Sentinel, and Wirewood Symbiote. Plague isn't unbeatable, but it is devestating regardless.

    Firstly, Plague wipes most of their board. Then, it sticks around to shut them down until they find an Abrupt Decay. Even if they do, the damage is already done. If they don't have an immediate Abrupt Decay, we are likely so far ahead on board that it won't matter if/when they finally do.

    If you're skeptical, I recommend trying it before criticizing it. Or just ask some Elves players what they think.
    Sligh
    Echo Stompy
    /r Miracle Intuition
    Yorion's Intuition
    5c Hollow Vine

    Quote Originally Posted by MMogg View Post
    In porn terms, Zoo has a 11" shlong and an impressive money shot, but it's over in 4 minutes, whereas Landstill is a good 8" and can go for 30 minutes.

  7. #2307
    Member
    Manipulato's Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2013
    Location

    Kempten, Germany
    Posts

    467

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    Quote Originally Posted by Hanni View Post
    Engineered Plague is most certainly the best Elves hate available. The only thing it doesn't kill is Deathrite Shaman, Nettle Sentinel, and Wirewood Sentinel. Plague isn't unbeatable, but it is devestating regardless.

    Firstly, Plague wipes most of their board. Then, it sticks around to shut them down until they find an Abrupt Decay. Even if they do, the damage is already done. If they don't have an immediate Abrupt Decay, we are likely so far ahead on board that it won't matter if/when they finally do.

    If you're skeptical, I recommend trying it before criticizing it. Or just ask some Elves players what they think.
    I played the card on my own in Food Chain and I'm well aware of what it does and what not, your 2nd sentence was superfluous, but thx for the input
    Currently playing
    Eldrazi

  8. #2308
    Site Contributor
    Whitefaces's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2013
    Location

    London
    Posts

    1,378

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    Quote Originally Posted by Manipulato View Post
    Hey guys,
    I'm tinkering about playing this deck in the new meta because I think it's good positioned.

    How would you guys build your 75 now? Could you post your new lists? Would be cool!

    I'm especially interested for the manabase configuration and SB because I think that the MD will not change that much exept for the full 4 Swords instead of a AD /Swords split, right?

    Edit: I'm not 100% sure you guys really want Engineered Plague vs Elves as your #1 hate card tbh. The deck plays quite alot of non-elve dudes (4 Symbiotes/2 Dryad Arbor/1 Scavenging Ooze/2 Behemoth) or x/2's in form of 4 Shaman & 4 Sentinel which dont die to the plague. Other thing is it's more slow at cc3 than Zealous Persecution or similar effects & can be killed by AD or Reclamation Sage out of Green Suns Zenith. A small creature count is already enough to Behemoth us into death...I think cards like Containment Priest/Zealous Persecution/Ethersworn Canonist will be more efficient vs them.
    How do you guys see that?
    Hey! Glad you're thinking of coming over to this, I agree that it looks quite well positioned, my only worry is an uptick in -1-1 effects like we talked about on the last page. But we'll see.

    I need to work on a SB still, so this is subject to change, but I think my maindeck to start now will be the below.

    The noticeable differences are.

    1) Removed the Abrupt Decays and went back to the full set of Swords to Plowshares, I think this change is obvious.
    2) Removed the Sword of Fire and Ice, from the maindeck at least. With Miracles gone it loses a lot of value, I think we need to see how the meta shapes up. If there's a lot of 4c control and TNN then it'll come back.
    3) Basic Forest. There's a good chance both Delver and Lands see a lot more play which will punish our manabase more than before. I'm considering a Loam in the SB for this reason too.

    4 Noble Hierarch
    4 Deathrite Shaman
    4 Stoneforge Mystic
    4 True-Name Nemesis
    2 Leovold, Emissary of Trest

    2 Jace, the Mind Sculptor

    4 Brainstorm
    4 Force of Will
    4 Daze
    4 Swords to Plowshares

    1 Umezawa’s Jitte
    1 Batterskull

    2 spare slots, possibly Ponder or Stifle

    3 Tropical Island
    2 Tundra
    1 Underground Sea
    1 Scrubland
    3 Wasteland
    9 fetch
    1 Forest
    Quote Originally Posted by CutthroatCasual View Post
    Storm was killed by Leovold
    Quote Originally Posted by LegacyIsAnEternalFormat View Post
    The power of blue is overrated...I personally play Jund and I consistently top 4 FNMs with it.

  9. #2309

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    Quote Originally Posted by Whitefaces View Post
    Hey! Glad you're thinking of coming over to this, I agree that it looks quite well positioned, my only worry is an uptick in -1-1 effects like we talked about on the last page. But we'll see.

    I need to work on a SB still, so this is subject to change, but I think my maindeck to start now will be the below.

    The noticeable differences are.

    1) Removed the Abrupt Decays and went back to the full set of Swords to Plowshares, I think this change is obvious.
    2) Removed the Sword of Fire and Ice, from the maindeck at least. With Miracles gone it loses a lot of value, I think we need to see how the meta shapes up. If there's a lot of 4c control and TNN then it'll come back.
    3) Basic Forest. There's a good chance both Delver and Lands see a lot more play which will punish our manabase more than before. I'm considering a Loam in the SB for this reason too.

    4 Noble Hierarch
    4 Deathrite Shaman
    4 Stoneforge Mystic
    4 True-Name Nemesis
    2 Leovold, Emissary of Trest

    2 Jace, the Mind Sculptor

    4 Brainstorm
    4 Force of Will
    4 Daze
    4 Swords to Plowshares

    1 Umezawa’s Jitte
    1 Batterskull

    2 spare slots, possibly Ponder or Stifle

    3 Tropical Island
    2 Tundra
    1 Underground Sea
    1 Scrubland
    3 Wasteland
    9 fetch
    1 Forest
    Nice list, maybe this is where i will start too! i think our weaker match-ups are lands and combo like Storm, Sneak Show, elves so maybe our sideboard can be tailored more towards it.

    2 Flusterstorm (elves, Show and tell, storm, reanimator)
    2 Engineered Plague (elves, Dnt, tribal)
    1 Containment Priest (dredge, br reanimator, elves)
    1 Sword of Fire and Ice (opposing TNN, creature decks)
    1 Pithing Needle (catch all)
    2 Thoughtseize (combo)
    2 Surgical extraction (combo, graveyard)
    2 Abrupt Decay (catch all, delver, creatures)
    1 Garruk, Relentless (grindy matches, shardless, bug)
    1 Zealous Persecution (TNN decks, elves, DnT)

    What do you guys think?

  10. #2310
    Site Contributor
    Whitefaces's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2013
    Location

    London
    Posts

    1,378

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    Quote Originally Posted by mike1987 View Post
    Nice list, maybe this is where i will start too! i think our weaker match-ups are lands and combo like Storm, Sneak Show, elves so maybe our sideboard can be tailored more towards it.

    2 Flusterstorm (elves, Show and tell, storm, reanimator)
    2 Engineered Plague (elves, Dnt, tribal)
    1 Containment Priest (dredge, br reanimator, elves)
    1 Sword of Fire and Ice (opposing TNN, creature decks)
    1 Pithing Needle (catch all)
    2 Thoughtseize (combo)
    2 Surgical extraction (combo, graveyard)
    2 Abrupt Decay (catch all, delver, creatures)
    1 Garruk, Relentless (grindy matches, shardless, bug)
    1 Zealous Persecution (TNN decks, elves, DnT)

    What do you guys think?
    Yeah, I agree on those matchups being the ones we should concentrate on!

    I want some Meddling Mages in my sideboard I'm sure, that card is always an all star. After that I really like Canonist too as Storm and Elves look like they will be big.

    I'd like to try and not dedicate too many slots to fair matchups, if anything a Gideon or two, but our MD is quite well set up for that and we also have those two spare MD slots at the moment.

    I'll go over numbers and options when I get a chance
    Quote Originally Posted by CutthroatCasual View Post
    Storm was killed by Leovold
    Quote Originally Posted by LegacyIsAnEternalFormat View Post
    The power of blue is overrated...I personally play Jund and I consistently top 4 FNMs with it.

  11. #2311

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    I like keeping sofi main with what I think will be an uptick in tnn decks. I went 4-1 in a league yesterday only losing to slivers... crystalline sliver is pretty good.

    I played 4 swords 2 decay main because decay is still great against Delver.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  12. #2312
    Etherium is limited. Innovation is not.
    Hanni's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Columbus, OH
    Posts

    2,818

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    I still like running a couple of Decay main, too. It still deals with a great deal of things, from Jitte to Chalice. I've been pretty happy with 3 StP and 2 Decay myself, but 4/2 would be even better if the meta goes aggro heavy and combo light.
    Sligh
    Echo Stompy
    /r Miracle Intuition
    Yorion's Intuition
    5c Hollow Vine

    Quote Originally Posted by MMogg View Post
    In porn terms, Zoo has a 11" shlong and an impressive money shot, but it's over in 4 minutes, whereas Landstill is a good 8" and can go for 30 minutes.

  13. #2313

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    Quote Originally Posted by TSmiley View Post
    I like keeping sofi main with what I think will be an uptick in tnn decks. I went 4-1 in a league yesterday only losing to slivers... crystalline sliver is pretty good.

    I played 4 swords 2 decay main because decay is still great against Delver.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I think im going to play 3 stp 2 decays and keep playing without forest. My main doubt is to play or not stifles. And side board should get some changes.
    I will let you know my ideas

    Joy

  14. #2314

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    A card that I think should be on peoples' radars to include in the deck over the next few weeks is judge's familiar. Haven't settled on a configuration yet, but I always liked this one when combo and burn are popular. In a world where Delver rises, lingering souls is also worth keeping in mind. Just putting those ones out there because they have not seen play in a while but might be primed for a come back.

    Example of a pure bant list that I think might be reasonable:

    Land (19)
    4x Flooded Strand
    2x Misty Rainforest
    2x Savannah
    3x Tropical Island
    2x Tundra
    4x Wasteland
    2x Windswept Heath

    Artifact (3)
    1x Batterskull
    1x Sword of Fire and Ice
    1x Umezawa's Jitte

    Planeswalker (2)
    2x Gideon of the Trials

    Creature (16)
    3x Judge's Familiar
    4x Noble Hierarch
    4x Stoneforge Mystic
    4x True-Name Nemesis
    1x Vendilion Clique

    Instant (16)
    4x Brainstorm
    4x Daze
    4x Force of Will
    4x Swords to Plowshares

    Sorcery (4)
    4x Ponder

    Sideboard (15)
    1x Chill
    1x Disenchant
    2x Ethersworn Canonist
    1x Flusterstorm
    1x Garruk Relentless Flip
    1x Invasive Surgery
    1x Krosan Grip
    2x Meddling Mage
    1x Path to Exile
    1x Rest in Peace
    2x Surgical Extraction
    1x Sword of Feast and Famine
    Last edited by limbo; 04-25-2017 at 09:02 PM.

  15. #2315

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    I think these lists don't have enough removal for early deathrite shaman which i think is something you will want to focus on beating no matter what deck you're playing. Expect an uptick in deathrite shaman and combo decks.

  16. #2316
    Site Contributor
    Whitefaces's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2013
    Location

    London
    Posts

    1,378

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    Quote Originally Posted by drocker23 View Post
    I think these lists don't have enough removal for early deathrite shaman which i think is something you will want to focus on beating no matter what deck you're playing. Expect an uptick in deathrite shaman and combo decks.
    I've not really found DRS to be as threatening vs Bant than from other shells. Because of the equipment and our own Shamans its late game power is severely mitigated. You can afford to leave them around a lot more than you can from a Delver deck as we're not trying to disrupt the opponent, but to establish our own game plan which is usually far superior. Just a bit harder to set up. And anyway, a full set of StP, Jitte and some people are playing Decays still, it's not nothing.

    Combo on the other hand is a worry, I'm considering either a pair of Spell Pierce or Stifles ala TSmiley in the maindeck.
    Quote Originally Posted by CutthroatCasual View Post
    Storm was killed by Leovold
    Quote Originally Posted by LegacyIsAnEternalFormat View Post
    The power of blue is overrated...I personally play Jund and I consistently top 4 FNMs with it.

  17. #2317

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    I agree- our own drs counter drs from Delver quite well. Also- I don't think judges familiar is where we want to be unless you want to play a trest shell with the 1gu 2/2 that makes your guys damaging ophidians.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  18. #2318
    Etherium is limited. Innovation is not.
    Hanni's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Columbus, OH
    Posts

    2,818

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    Quote Originally Posted by Whitefaces View Post
    Combo on the other hand is a worry, I'm considering either a pair of Spell Pierce or Stifles ala TSmiley in the maindeck.
    Vendilion Clique is a pretty strong card against combo that does good work in alot of other matchups...
    Sligh
    Echo Stompy
    /r Miracle Intuition
    Yorion's Intuition
    5c Hollow Vine

    Quote Originally Posted by MMogg View Post
    In porn terms, Zoo has a 11" shlong and an impressive money shot, but it's over in 4 minutes, whereas Landstill is a good 8" and can go for 30 minutes.

  19. #2319
    Site Contributor
    Whitefaces's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jun 2013
    Location

    London
    Posts

    1,378

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    Quote Originally Posted by Hanni View Post
    Vendilion Clique is a pretty strong card against combo that does good work in alot of other matchups...
    It is, but there are already a lot of three drops. If we add a Clique to the main it's in the slot of a TNN, Leovold or Jace I think. I don't like the sound of that as all of those look set to be great in this new meta.
    Quote Originally Posted by CutthroatCasual View Post
    Storm was killed by Leovold
    Quote Originally Posted by LegacyIsAnEternalFormat View Post
    The power of blue is overrated...I personally play Jund and I consistently top 4 FNMs with it.

  20. #2320
    Victory Dance ftw?
    Mirrislegend's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2006
    Posts

    959

    Re: [Deck] Bant

    Without Miracles demanding lots of Abrupt Decay between the maindeck and the sideboard, what will our removal package evolve into? Is it worthwhile to still play any Abrupt Decays? What about Fatal Push? I'm also fond of Disfigure, as it hits Deathrite (!), Delver, Pyromancer, Monastery Mentor, Stoneforge, Baleful Strix, Aluren combo pieces, all of Burn's creatures, all of DnT's creatures (besides Crusader), and all of Elves' creatures (besides Craterhoof), and probably more.

    I'm thinking 4 StP and 2 Decay MD, with 2 Disfigure and maybe a Krosan Grip or two in the SB.

    Lastly, isn't Engineered Plague fairly narrow? Unless you expect truly overwhelming numbers of Elves or Death and Taxes, I cannot see justifying more than 1 in the SB. Zealous Persecution is just so much more flexible.
    Quote Originally Posted by Tacosnape
    <Dallieza> your mom uses the stack
    <System> Player Lost
    Quote Originally Posted by Tacosnape
    Every time someone drops a Chalice against me I think of the Family Guy episode where the guy in jail stabs himself with the knife to see how it feels and then he says, "My God! Is this what I've been doing to people? I belong in here!"
    Referring to the art on Stasis:
    Quote Originally Posted by Pinder View Post
    Well, uh...the mime, you see, is....um...

    God, is that furry bondage?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)