I have the data from the event, here's a preliminary while I figure out how to do more fun stuff:
16 reanimator decks, piloted by some very competent players, and none in the T8 or even T16.Code:Archtype Count % of Field Avg Place Win Loss Draw Win % Reanimator 16 12.40% 70 43 48 1 47.10% Zoo 11 8.53% 43 48 33 3 58.33% Merfolk 10 7.75% 56 36 29 1 55.05% ANT 8 6.20% 53 30 28 0 51.72% New Horizons 8 6.20% 46 32 22 4 57.47% NO Bant 8 6.20% 76 20 25 3 43.75% Goblins 5 3.88% 73 13 15 1 45.98% Lands 4 3.10% 47 15 10 4 56.32% Bant Stoneforge 3 2.33% 61 10 10 0 50.00% Belcher 3 2.33% 79 7 10 0 41.18% Bwg Aggro 3 2.33% 55 10 9 3 50.00% Canadian Thresh 3 2.33% 98 3 7 4 30.95% Dredge 3 2.33% 82 7 9 0 43.75% Landstill 3 2.33% 99 3 8 2 28.21% Thopter/Sword 3 2.33% 102 3 12 0 20.00% UWR Walkers 3 2.33% 59 10 8 1 54.39% BWR Control 2 1.55% 95 4 7 0 36.36% Elves 2 1.55% 117 1 7 0 12.50% Enchantress 2 1.55% 81 4 5 0 44.44% Eva Green 2 1.55% 83 5 6 0 45.45% Meathooks 2 1.55% 58 6 3 4 56.41% Painter 2 1.55% 61 7 6 0 53.85% TES 2 1.55% 44 8 7 0 53.33% ABC Bant 1 0.78% 106 1 3 0 25.00% Aeon Bridge 1 0.78% 34 5 3 0 62.50% Aggro Bant 1 0.78% 65 3 5 0 37.50% Bant Survival 1 0.78% 1 8 2 1 75.76% BW Aggro 1 0.78% 114 0 6 0 0.00% Dragon Stompy 1 0.78% 82 2 3 0 40.00% GBWr Survival 1 0.78% 63 3 3 0 50.00% GW Aggro-Control 1 0.78% 122 0 1 1 16.67% MBC 1 0.78% 78 2 3 1 38.89% Mono-g Stompy 1 0.78% 127 0 5 0 0.00% MUC 1 0.78% 6 6 1 2 74.07% MUD 1 0.78% 89 2 3 0 40.00% Next Level Thresh 1 0.78% 10 6 2 0 75.00% Pox 1 0.78% 124 0 3 0 0.00% RB Aggro-Control 1 0.78% 71 2 4 0 33.33% Sligh 1 0.78% 15 6 2 0 75.00% Spanish Inquisition 1 0.78% 73 3 5 0 37.50% The Gate 1 0.78% 84 2 3 0 40.00% UB Disruption 1 0.78% 24 5 3 0 62.50% Ub Trinket CTop 1 0.78% 8 6 2 1 70.37% Ubg CounterTop 1 0.78% 13 6 2 0 75.00%
Last edited by cdr; 05-19-2010 at 10:51 AM. Reason: add win %
“It's possible. But it involves... {checks archives} Nature's Revolt, Opalescence, two Unstable Shapeshifters (one of which started as a Doppelganger), a Tide, an animated land, a creature with Fading, a Silver Wyvern, some way to get a creature into play in response to stuff, some way to get a land into play in response to stuff (a different land from the animated land), and one heck of a Rube Goldberg timing diagram.”
-David DeLaney
Double Zoo and Merfolk in the T8 confirms these archtypes as decent choices in the current meta.
BAN TEH ENTOMBZ!
Such a nice breakdown of archetypes. I like that New Horizons is getting noticed. I like that Bant Survival did well with only one player out of 120 people. People that call Legacy unbalanced, a broken format, all blue should look at this.
Chuck, I was almost going to ask if someone was going to do this.
I'd like to see the split between U and UG merfolk played. Also, the number of Lands players is surprising, I feel. Although some of the better players chose not to play it (like alex bertoncini)
Level 2 Judge
Owner, Tales of Adventure Comics and Games, Coopersburg, PA
Updated the first post with avg place. Zoo (43rd, 58.33%) and New Horizons (46th, 57.47%) obviously did well, followed by ANT+TES.
Last edited by cdr; 05-19-2010 at 10:55 AM.
“It's possible. But it involves... {checks archives} Nature's Revolt, Opalescence, two Unstable Shapeshifters (one of which started as a Doppelganger), a Tide, an animated land, a creature with Fading, a Silver Wyvern, some way to get a creature into play in response to stuff, some way to get a land into play in response to stuff (a different land from the animated land), and one heck of a Rube Goldberg timing diagram.”
-David DeLaney
I'm pretty sure you've got a Bwg deadguy list misclassified as Bwg aggro. Not a huge deal because my friend dropped after going 2-2-1, but just for clarity's sake I figured I would mention
Will says I'm in BZK. I don't know what is going on.
"Misclassified" depends on your opinion, I guess. Added total win/loss/draw and win %.
I'll maybe do some archtype breakdowns, but that'll require a lot more plumbing. Maybe I should just ask Jared Sylva for his spreadsheet.
“It's possible. But it involves... {checks archives} Nature's Revolt, Opalescence, two Unstable Shapeshifters (one of which started as a Doppelganger), a Tide, an animated land, a creature with Fading, a Silver Wyvern, some way to get a creature into play in response to stuff, some way to get a land into play in response to stuff (a different land from the animated land), and one heck of a Rube Goldberg timing diagram.”
-David DeLaney
I know its highly irrelevant, but I know there was a Bwg deadguy list (as I put in a lot of testing on it and white_ghost played it), I just figured it was a polite way of pointing it out to you. As opposed to calling you names for missing something that was such a big deal. I just figured it would help with the whole accurate analysis thing. It doesn't affect the grand scheme of things, but it does add a minute degree of accuracy by adjusting it.
and the very definition of classifications involves incorrectly identifying something which dilutes the accuracy of a calculated set of results. I have no clue why I"m bothered by it this much, but I am, so I apologize for reiterating this point a few times in the post. I should also probably go to sleep
Will says I'm in BZK. I don't know what is going on.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote