Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 195

Thread: Format Discussion - The Ban List

  1. #21
    I like Tacos.
    dahcmai's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2006
    Location

    Traverse City, MI
    Posts

    2,202

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    Oh Land Tax would. I know exactly the deck I would put it in already and it's pretty competitive as is. It screams for that card so much.

  2. #22

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    I'd like to see Frantic Search come off to give me something else to goldfish besides Tendrils. 12 cantrip Spring Tide with Scrolls would be an absolute blast. As is, relying on Cloud of Faeries/Snap is sketchy.
    BZK! - Storm Boards

    Been there, tried that, still casting Doomsday.
    Drawing my deck for 0 mana since 2013.

  3. #23

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    Quote Originally Posted by Meekrab View Post
    Mind Twist wouldn't be played, at least not by anyone trying to win. It was banned from Vintage in 1996 and then unbanned in 2000 and finally unrestricted in 2007. Mind Twist was relevant back when you could stall the game out with Moat or whatever for a million turns and then build up a googleplex mana to discard your opponent's whole hand with counter backup and then cast a Serra Angel and swing 5 times. These days we have what, 3 different 1-mana discard spells that let you see your opponents' hand? I really doubt there's any deck that actually wants Mind Twist. Unban it til someone proves me wrong.

    Mind's Desire would be fucked in half retarded good. I'm pretty sure this doesn't need to be debated, but playing a bunch of spells for free is good.


    And so is drawing cards for negative mana cost. You don't need Fastbond to make Gush stupid, you just need a storm combo deck with Islands. Oh hay thar TES. The fact that it both produces mana AND draws cards on Turn 3 is what makes it so clearly in need of staying banned.

    Land Tax is so weak it's hilarious. Deck Parfait was never designed to handle Storm combo. I'd love to see it try, though. Unban.

    Library of Alexandria might be able to be unbanned. It's a nonbasic land, it's got a very strong restriction, and the fact there just aren't that many of them will keep it from ever becoming a huge problem.

    Mana Drain is my personal pet card that couldn't possibly HURT Legacy. Nobody in this format hardcasts counterspells that cost more than U, because all of them suck. All of them. This one doesn't. Why can't we play with the jellyfishes? Because I might actually have enough mana to Mindslaver someone? :(
    Blue definitely doesn't need a boost and we don't need to discourage people even more from playing high CC spells. Also I don't want to pay another $300 to play a control deck.

  4. #24
    Cobra Kai Sensie
    dontbiteitholmes's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2004
    Posts

    1,721

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    Quote Originally Posted by dahcmai View Post
    Oh Land Tax would. I know exactly the deck I would put it in already and it's pretty competitive as is. It screams for that card so much.
    LOL, decklist please.
    big links in sigs are obnoxious -PR

    Don't disrespect my dojo dude...

    Sweep the leg!

  5. #25
    Member

    Join Date

    Jan 2005
    Location

    I actually live in actual Chicago
    Posts

    679

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    Quote Originally Posted by FieryBalrog View Post
    Blue definitely doesn't need a boost and we don't need to discourage people even more from playing high CC spells. Also I don't want to pay another $300 to play a control deck.
    You say 'blue' doesn't need a boost like Landstill or Solidarity are running over the format. Tempo decks can't really play Mana Drain. In a vacuum, I understand the objection to 'making blue stronger' but the type of 'blue' decks that are dominant right now wouldn't have much use for a card that requires them to keep UU open to be useful. And nobody cares about your budget, least of all the DCI, or they would've banned Goyf, Jace, Grim Tutor, and dual lands already.

  6. #26
    Member

    Join Date

    Mar 2010
    Location

    Amsterdam
    Posts

    283

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    I'm all for unbanning alot of cards. I'd prefer a more combo/control based metagame anyways.

  7. #27
    I like Tacos.
    dahcmai's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2006
    Location

    Traverse City, MI
    Posts

    2,202

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    I really hate dealing with Mana Drain. That card is just scary. If you get the wrong thing countered, it just blows you out of the water. I used to purposely hit Force of will just to get that 5 mana. I don't want to see that thing in Legacy and I own a set. I played enough Vintage to know how strong it is.

  8. #28

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    Not can tempo decks like Thresh and Team America play Mana Drain, but they will use their drain mana to enable casting Jace.
    BZK! - Storm Boards

    Been there, tried that, still casting Doomsday.
    Drawing my deck for 0 mana since 2013.

  9. #29
    Merkwürdigeliebe
    jazzykat's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Vienna, AT
    Posts

    913

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    Mana Drain might be too powerful with the printing of Jace 2.0. Without Jace2.0 I would have said what the heck, but now that I fully get how insane he is and how any extra colorless can be used to pay Daze and Spell Pierce I am not sure if it can get the nod and I have a full english NM playset as well!

    Gush is quite interesting though and may open up some interesting design space with Exploration/Fastbond, along the Coatl/Dryad traditional routes, or with the landfall mechanic. Honestly, I would love to see it unbanned assuming it wouldn't cause anything too degenerate to shake out. I mean we do have Vengevival, what's a little Gush action?

  10. #30
    Team Moosebite
    Volrath's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2009
    Location

    Oudega,tiny village in the Netherlands
    Posts

    104

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    Mana Drain into Fact or Fiction is downright frightening. Drain inot Jace 2.0 is devastating.
    The horror's that will come to pass if Drain is unbanned are terrifying, keep it there.

    Tax and Earthcraft on the other hand, shoud come of.But i'm yust the 10000000th guy mentioning it
    If there is such a thing as too much power, I have not discovered it.” —Volrath

    Founding father of Team Moosebite, the team that really bites.

  11. #31

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    Quote Originally Posted by Meekrab View Post
    And nobody cares about your budget, least of all the DCI
    Too bad for you mana drain continues to be banned then.

  12. #32

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    Haha people suggest the most ridiculous things to unban. Mind's Desire? Library? Mana Drain? You have no idea what you're smoking if you think any of these should be allowed in the Legacy format.
    Suddenly, Fluffy realized she wasn't quite like the other bunnies anymore.

    -Team R&D-
    -noitcelfeR maeT-

  13. #33
    Greatness awaits!
    Lemnear's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2010
    Location

    Berlin, Germany
    Posts

    6,998

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    Yeah ban Survival and unleash Desire ... that will balance the format *facepalm*

  14. #34
    Bands with Others
    menace13's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2009
    Location

    NY, NY
    Posts

    1,220

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    Quote Originally Posted by Rico Suave View Post
    Haha people suggest the most ridiculous things to unban. Mind's Desire? Library? Mana Drain? You have no idea what you're smoking if you think any of these should be allowed in the Legacy format.
    Pff. Those are perfectly fine as long as Bazaar,Oath and Mystical are there.
    Quote Originally Posted by Cavius The Great View Post
    Respect my shine bitch!

  15. #35
    Member

    Join Date

    Dec 2010
    Location

    Canada
    Posts

    64

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    I really don't feel like seeing mind twist unbanned, it will see play in TES (sb) or storm post sb, where dark ritual/LED + mind twist becomes card advantage...

    Frantic search in spring tide would indeed be quite a blast !, If they ban a piece of survival it will re-balance anyway : they could realistically unban frantic search with the resurgence of CB decks / merfolk.

  16. #36
    Meat Slicer at Deli

    Join Date

    Mar 2004
    Location

    Ypsi, MI
    Posts

    399

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    Honestly, I'd love to see no changes made one way or the other. I think that would be Wizards way of going "you broke your format, now fix it so we don't have to". It'd give us another chance to stop whining and knock survival off it's horse.
    Whenever I see a kid in a wheelchair it makes me a little sad. Because I always think, "Gee, they could have used those same wheels to make a bike for a regular kid. What a waste."

  17. #37
    I'm Jewish!
    TheDarkshineKnight's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2006
    Location

    Arlington, Virginia
    Posts

    433

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    Quote Originally Posted by dahcmai View Post
    Oh Land Tax would. I know exactly the deck I would put it in already and it's pretty competitive as is. It screams for that card so much.
    DID SOMEBODY SAY QUINN?

    I thought I heard someone say Quinn. >_>
    Quote Originally Posted by Pinder View Post
    Now, how can you be sure it's rape when there's no way to tell if a barnacle is consenting or not? For all we know it was actually two first time lesbian barnacles who signed a release for the footage to be used in the newest installment of Barnacles Gone Wild: Seafoam Splash.

  18. #38

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    Why is Skullclamp still in the ban list? Much like Mind twist or Hypnotic specter, the decks that use Skullclamp aren't the ultimate brokeness anymore. Affinity is no longer the most scary aggro deck and now even one - drops have two or three thoughness. Although the card draw is undeniably good, by the time it becomes a relevant engine in Legacy it's already the late game and the deck looks midrange. Against any good combo deck, Skullclamp is a card as dead as Jitte and against control skullclamp wouldn't help a lot once a Countertop lock or some powerful enchantment like Moat is online. Elves remain as the most likely suspect to abuse it but, hey if even with Glimpse it's a laughable deck then having just another redundant card won't make it that much better. If it became tier 1, would it be bad to have another deck joining the gaunglet?

  19. #39
    Member

    Join Date

    Jul 2004
    Location

    Corning, NY
    Posts

    98

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    I can tell you from experience that Elves plus Skullclamp = bad idea for legacy. Glimpse might seem like its strong, but trust me when I say that Skullclamp would be much much much worse. Skullclamp + Wirewood Herald + active Priest of Titania + any number of elves in play equals game in the blink of an eye as they can hit critical mass by turn 4, stop combo with chalices, and stomp on any countertop strategy before it really gets the chance to set up.

  20. #40
    Member

    Join Date

    Jan 2005
    Location

    I actually live in actual Chicago
    Posts

    679

    Re: Format Discussion - The Ban List

    Quote Originally Posted by JCLe View Post
    I really don't feel like seeing mind twist unbanned, it will see play in TES (sb) or storm post sb, where dark ritual/LED + mind twist becomes card advantage...
    Dark Ritual into Mind Twist? Really?

    I'm just going to pretend you didn't suggest using LED to cast Mind Twist, because that's even funnier.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)