Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: [SCD] Malakir Bloodwitch

  1. #1

    [SCD] Malakir Bloodwitch

    Ok, so for quite some time now Tombstalker had been the giant black flying beater of choice in deck that want such a thing (mainly midrange BG or Junk decks, I've seen Stalker's in some Counterbalance lists but that's Jank). It's powerful and can be very efficient, sure, but I think the Bloodwitch is much better, and I'm going to try and explain why. For those who are not familiar here's the condensed rules text:

    3BB
    Creature- Vampire
    Flying, Pro-White
    ETB trigger-for each vampire you control, tgt opponent looses 1 life and you gain 1 life.
    4/4

    The biggest plus is that it's pro-white, which turns off over half the removal in the format that can kill it (STPS, PTE, Vindicate). The clock is similar (on its own is does 17 damage after 4 swings vs 20 from the Stalker), and with only 1 other Vampire on the board (many such lists like Nighthawk) and a couple fetchs or the like form the opponent, it can be just as fast.

    A few other corner case advantages:

    Lifegain, even a point or two can be relevant when racing an aggro deck.
    Actually a relevant CMC when revealed to Counterbalance (to hit FoW).
    Swings past White Flying Blockers (Iona, Aven Mindcensor, Decree of Justice tokens, Wall of Denial (which can actually be quite good in some metagames))

    Negatives:

    Can be hit by counterbalance (FoW)
    1 turn slower clock in some cases
    Can't cost under 5, whereas Stalker can cost 2 but rarely on turn 2.
    Can't block and kill a 4/5 Tarmogoyf.

    Overall, I feel the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

    Discuss....

  2. #2

    Re: [SCD] Malakir Bloodwitch

    You deeply underestimate the drawback of costing 5.

  3. #3
    Site Contributor
    Admiral_Arzar's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2010
    Location

    Denver, CO
    Posts

    1,289

    Re: [SCD] Malakir Bloodwitch

    Quote Originally Posted by Zolek View Post
    You deeply underestimate the drawback of costing 5.
    Agreed. The card was only good in standard because Baneslayer Angel and Path to Exile were in half the decks in the format. It's far too slow for Legacy without mana accel (and there are better things to accel into).
    Lord of the Chalice

    Quote Originally Posted by Julian23 View Post
    Since playing against Spiral Tide provides a lot fun for both players is something only someone who's not had sex for quite a while could enjoy, I pull out GW Maverick.
    Quote Originally Posted by Brainstorm Ape View Post
    Spikes are supposed to enjoy winning by leveraging their talents, but this card can't fetch the most SKILL INTENSIVE card in all of Magic?

    Clearly aimed at Modern plebs, not gonna be a pillar of our format.
    Stompy Discord: https://discord.gg/6cesvkz

  4. #4
    Member

    Join Date

    Jun 2004
    Location

    Madison, WI
    Posts

    1,601

    Re: [SCD] Malakir Bloodwitch

    For 5 mana you can Sneak an Emrakul, hardcast a Dream Halls, draw your deck with Ad Nauseum, etc. A 4/4 flier with pro StP seems a little lame in comparison, ya dig? TS sees (limited) play because he costs 2.
    Quote Originally Posted by Draener View Post
    You know who thinks it's sweet to play against 8 different decks in an 8 round tournament? People who don't like to win, or people that play combo. This is not EDH; Legacy is a competitive environment, and it should reward skill - more so than it does.
    Quote Originally Posted by Borealis View Post
    Plow their Mom every chance you get!

  5. #5
    Pray for Rain
    Tammit67's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2010
    Location

    Philadelphia, PA, USA
    Posts

    1,534

    Re: [SCD] Malakir Bloodwitch

    Quote Originally Posted by Killane View Post

    Overall, I feel the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

    Discuss....
    You'd be the only one

  6. #6

    Re: [SCD] Malakir Bloodwitch

    Quote Originally Posted by Zolek View Post
    You deeply underestimate the drawback of costing 5.
    Agreed.

    Tombstalker is only good because he costs 2/3. He would not be played if it wasn't for that.
    5 mana means you win the game with that card, Bloodwitch is FAR from winning you the game. In fact, most decks laugh at it.

  7. #7
    I like Tacos.
    dahcmai's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jan 2006
    Location

    Traverse City, MI
    Posts

    2,202

    Re: [SCD] Malakir Bloodwitch

    Scary thing is if it costed 1BB, it would only be playable, not busted and maybe not even playable.

  8. #8

    Re: [SCD] Malakir Bloodwitch

    Quote Originally Posted by SpikeyMikey View Post
    For 5 mana you can Sneak an Emrakul, hardcast a Dream Halls, draw your deck with Ad Nauseum, etc. A 4/4 flier with pro StP seems a little lame in comparison, ya dig? TS sees (limited) play because he costs 2.
    While I see the point of "what else can you do with 5 mana", none fo these examples apply to the deck in which Tombstalker sees play. I'm certainly not saying "OMG BLOODWITCH IS TEH AWESOME PUT IT IN ALL YOUR DECKS!!!!!!", I'm running a situational comparision with the 'Stalker itself.

    When runnung BG midrange -type decks in the past (long since set aside for Counterbalance and then TES recently), I found the 'Stalker almost always just ate removal (of course, my loca meta at the time was devoid of combo so the removal count may have been a bit higher than the norm), and that remvoal was almost always white. It's not hard to cast one off Dark Ritual.

    Sure TS costs 2, but if that two is essentially a duress for their StpS, it's not doing its job.

  9. #9

    Re: [SCD] Malakir Bloodwitch

    Costs way too much, loses the race to almost every non-tribal creature in the format despite the fact that they cost half as much mana. Unplayable.

  10. #10

    Re: [SCD] Malakir Bloodwitch

    Ok. I guess the format has moved on. I haven't run BG midrange in ages anyways. Let's move on.

  11. #11

    Re: [SCD] Malakir Bloodwitch

    When runnung BG midrange -type decks in the past (long since set aside for Counterbalance and then TES recently), I found the 'Stalker almost always just ate removal (of course, my loca meta at the time was devoid of combo so the removal count may have been a bit higher than the norm), and that remvoal was almost always white. It's not hard to cast one off Dark Ritual.

    Sure TS costs 2, but if that two is essentially a duress for their StpS, it's not doing its job.
    Play Thrun. Hes like this card only not terrible. The fact that there is debate over whether he is good enough should clue you in to where malakir's playability lies.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)