Frantic Search is only "busted" because of high tide effects, it's just a freeish instant careful studyOriginally Posted by TheDarkshineKnight
also, i wasn't posting a thread considering unbanning memory jar, lol, just discussing it
I will make use of every tool that fate presents.
Its banned because Ad Nauseam doesn't need another ridiculous form of card advantage
TIME POLICE
it's definitely banned because it would just make combo more broken, but frantic search is by no means card advantage
I will make use of every tool that fate presents.
In a combo deck like Ad Nauseam or High Tide, the card selection from Frantic Search is card advantage. In a combo deck where there are most definitely cards that are useless or bad on the combo turn, trading 2 lands and Search for 2 useful cards is card advantage.
Just a little experiment:
1. Count cards in hand
2. Play Frantic Search
3. Count cards in hand.
Cards in hand in is not the only measure of "Card Advantage." By using your own criteria:
1. Count cards in hand
2. Play Wrath of God
3. Count cards in hand.
Oh My God! Wrath of God is card disadvantage.
It's how Frantic Search progresses the game state of the deck that's playing it by either:
A. Putting cards you want in the graveyard, in the graveyard
B. Letting you see more cards and getting rid of less useful ones
C. Untapping lands
D. Adding to storm count
E. A, B, C, and D
I think although we all understand that this thread is terrible, you can't argue that Frantic Search is card advantage if you actually know what card advantage means.
This thread is as moot as that 'help me pick a name' thread or the kittens naming thread.
I am convinced that WotC is "dumbing" the game because of all the stupid posts they come across on MTG-related forums
Single Card Discussion threads must follow the criteria outlined in the site rules. This thread failed.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
