Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 63

Thread: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

  1. #21

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    I kind of agree with wotc about bannings vs restrictions. Bannings in Legacy are the thing that differentiates it from Vintage so I feel like it's a valuable line to draw that separates the two, very different, formats.

  2. #22
    Don't ping the hydra
    DrJones's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Spain
    Posts

    107,480

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Quote Originally Posted by DragoFireheart View Post
    Here is the thing that bothers me most: lets assume brainstorm is banned but blue is STILL the "best" deck. What would people suggest banning next (since that is going to be the natural reaction) to nerf blue? Force of Will? Other cantrips? Snapcaster?
    Force of Will, obviously. I can guarantee that banning brainstorm won't impact the format at all, because it will have the same results than banning Atog in standard affinity. There's simply too much filtering available and wotc will keep printing more every set, and the control decks that don't need filtering will instead play card drawing effects.

    However, banning FoW automatically fixes the format for good because it kills the blue tempo decks and the blue combo decks that have been ruining magic since forever.

    Then, WotC hires me to make sure that the next Snapcaster Mage is red and Insectile Aberration is black, and I use my power to print "Chancellor of the Discard" and other cards that actually fix the format without having to rely on broken cards that makes all other colors irrelevant.

    By the way, the reason people don't play discard anymore is not because of brainstorm, but because discard is severely outclassed by free (and undercosted) countermagic.
    Please stop talking about whether Force of Will is broken or not. It obviously is, and rather than "the glue that holds vintage together" it would be better to call it "the rug under which you hide the filth until there's so much that you can no longer conceal it".

  3. #23

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Quote Originally Posted by DrJones View Post
    However, banning FoW automatically fixes the format for good because it kills the blue tempo decks and the blue combo decks that have been ruining magic since forever.
    -So everyone can play Zoo like in Modern? That's your idea of "Magic"?

    I hope enough people listen to you. Banning FoW will kill Legacy and then more people will play EDH. It'll also makes duals cheaper for EDH. Go on, keep crying for the ban of blue: I hope you win!

  4. #24
    Don't ping the hydra
    DrJones's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Spain
    Posts

    107,480

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Quote Originally Posted by DragoFireheart View Post
    -So everyone can play Zoo like in Modern? That's your idea of "Magic"?

    I hope enough people listen to you. Banning FoW will kill Legacy and then more people will play EDH. It'll also makes duals cheaper for EDH. Go on, keep crying for the ban of blue: I hope you win!
    Heh, it's not my fault that WotC is stupid and doesn't ban any piece of Zoo in modern, or prints stupid cards like Delver of Secrets and Snapcaster Mage, but people here is also pretty dumb. You know, the only nonblue deck that gets played and wins nowadays is dredge because it doesn't cast spells, and people conclude that the problem is brainstorm and not the free timewalks.
    Please stop talking about whether Force of Will is broken or not. It obviously is, and rather than "the glue that holds vintage together" it would be better to call it "the rug under which you hide the filth until there's so much that you can no longer conceal it".

  5. #25

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Quote Originally Posted by DrJones View Post
    Heh, it's not my fault that WotC is stupid and doesn't ban any piece of Zoo in modern, or prints stupid cards like Delver of Secrets and Snapcaster Mage, but people here is also pretty dumb.
    WotC wants everyone to play Zoo or deck like Zoo. That and the fact that combo decks of jank cards rule the format are why Modern is dying.

    You know, the only nonblue deck that gets played and wins nowadays is dredge because it doesn't cast spells, and people conclude that the problem is brainstorm and not the free timewalks.
    Maverick and Zoo don't exist in Legacy.

  6. #26

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Quote Originally Posted by DragoFireheart View Post
    It'll also makes duals cheaper for EDH. Go on, keep crying for the ban of blue: I hope you win!
    wtf? there are people without 40 duals? Furthermore, there are people without 40 duals who play legacy?!

  7. #27

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Quote Originally Posted by DrJones View Post
    However, banning FoW automatically fixes the format for good because it kills the blue tempo decks and the blue combo decks that have been ruining magic since forever
    You do play legacy I guess, eh? It's hard to tell, but you have 1K+ posts so I guess you do... Sorry you hate blue tempo decks (LOLOL)

    Well, anyway, there's this thing called combo, without free counterspells combo decks become much stronger. In fact, this is so true that people often refer to Force as "the glue that holds legacy together"

    You should go check out some Storm decks or TES and see why FoW is important for us.

  8. #28
    Don't ping the hydra
    DrJones's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Spain
    Posts

    107,480

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Quote Originally Posted by xDITx Force of Will View Post
    You do play legacy I guess, eh? It's hard to tell, but you have 1K+ posts so I guess you do... Sorry you hate blue tempo decks (LOLOL)

    Well, anyway, there's this thing called combo, without free counterspells combo decks become much stronger. In fact, this is so true that people often refer to Force as "the glue that holds legacy together"

    You should go check out some Storm decks or TES and see why FoW is important for us.
    I think you got it wrong, combo decks become stronger because they can play Force of Will, and fact is, 90% of banned cards belonged to combo decks that used FoW to force the combo through all kinds of hate. Yeah, it sucks but it's an ugly truth.

    Or where you thinking in those other combo decks that cast a bunch of rituals? Heh, R&D confessed in an article that they keep them legal because they can put up a fight against the FoW decks, otherwise, it would just be FoW decks all day. Did you think for a moment that any deck that reliably kills you on turns 1-2 would be legal otherwise?

    If you still don't understand why free countermagic is destroying the format, you could also read this article that sums it nicely. It's the section: "What happens when everybody plays duress", but I also urge you to read the section "Are we speeding offtrack or did we already crash and are already dead?".
    Please stop talking about whether Force of Will is broken or not. It obviously is, and rather than "the glue that holds vintage together" it would be better to call it "the rug under which you hide the filth until there's so much that you can no longer conceal it".

  9. #29

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Quote Originally Posted by DrJones View Post
    I think you got it wrong, combo decks become stronger because they can play Force of Will, and fact is, 90% of banned cards belonged to combo decks that used FoW to force the combo through all kinds of hate. Yeah, it sucks but it's an ugly truth.
    Reanimator is the only competitive combo deck that runs Force. The storm decks are also extremely powerful and do not use Force.

    ANT or some similar deck would dominate unconditionally if Force were gone.

  10. #30

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    DrJones I missed you. That is all :D

  11. #31

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Quote Originally Posted by DrJones View Post
    Force of Will did 9/11
    Not sure if serious...

  12. #32
    Site Contributor
    Admiral_Arzar's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2010
    Location

    Denver, CO
    Posts

    1,289

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Quote Originally Posted by UnderwaterGuy View Post
    Reanimator is the only competitive combo deck that runs Force. The storm decks are also extremely powerful and do not use Force.

    ANT or some similar deck would dominate unconditionally if Force were gone.
    I guess you forgot about Spiral Tide, Hive Mind, every other deck that plays Show and Tell (and a few that play Natural Order). Since you listed "competitive" implying "right now" I won't expound on all the other combo decks with FOW that have seen play in the last year or so.

    As for ANT dominating without Force? Who knows. It's quite possible to fight it with discard, and as a storm player I actually fear Stompy and Staxxx-esque strategies much more than blue (but stompy is bad because of blue decks, so I don't usually have to worry about it).
    Lord of the Chalice

    Quote Originally Posted by Julian23 View Post
    Since playing against Spiral Tide provides a lot fun for both players is something only someone who's not had sex for quite a while could enjoy, I pull out GW Maverick.
    Quote Originally Posted by Brainstorm Ape View Post
    Spikes are supposed to enjoy winning by leveraging their talents, but this card can't fetch the most SKILL INTENSIVE card in all of Magic?

    Clearly aimed at Modern plebs, not gonna be a pillar of our format.
    Stompy Discord: https://discord.gg/6cesvkz

  13. #33

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Quote Originally Posted by xDITx Force of Will View Post
    wtf? there are people without 40 duals? Furthermore, there are people without 40 duals who play legacy?!
    As far as I can tell, there are only 28 dual lands. I keep hearing rumors of lands that tap for extra colors of mana with no drawback in colors that don't cast Brainstorm or Dark Ritual, but I'm pretty sure they're false.
    BZK! - Storm Boards

    Been there, tried that, still casting Doomsday.
    Drawing my deck for 0 mana since 2013.

  14. #34

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Quote Originally Posted by Admiral_Arzar View Post
    I guess you forgot about Spiral Tide, Hive Mind, every other deck that plays Show and Tell (and a few that play Natural Order). Since you listed "competitive" implying "right now" I won't expound on all the other combo decks with FOW that have seen play in the last year or so.

    As for ANT dominating without Force? Who knows. It's quite possible to fight it with discard, and as a storm player I actually fear Stompy and Staxxx-esque strategies much more than blue (but stompy is bad because of blue decks, so I don't usually have to worry about it).
    Yes I meant current top tier decks. Hive Mind isn't as good as it was in the summer and I haven't seen Spiral Tide doing well for a while.

    I'm not saying those aren't real decks but they aren't the best decks around right now and that's all I said.

    and I realize now I was trolled :(

  15. #35
    Member
    boneclub24's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2010
    Location

    Seattle
    Posts

    404

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    I got kind of annoyed with the numerous grammatical errors... doesn't anyone proof-read these things?
    "If you're playing Storm in Legacy, you need to believe that what your deck does is better than what their deck does."

  16. #36
    Don't ping the hydra
    DrJones's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Spain
    Posts

    107,480

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Quote Originally Posted by UnderwaterGuy View Post
    Yes I meant current top tier decks. Hive Mind isn't as good as it was in the summer and I haven't seen Spiral Tide doing well for a while.

    I'm not saying those aren't real decks but they aren't the best decks around right now and that's all I said.

    and I realize now I was trolled :(
    Hive Mind made Top 8 at GP Amsterdam two weeks ago.
    Please stop talking about whether Force of Will is broken or not. It obviously is, and rather than "the glue that holds vintage together" it would be better to call it "the rug under which you hide the filth until there's so much that you can no longer conceal it".

  17. #37

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Quote Originally Posted by boneclub24 View Post
    I got kind of annoyed with the numerous grammatical errors... doesn't anyone proof-read these things?
    I felt this too at first but I assume English is not the author's first language.

    You'd think the website would at least have an editor though :/

  18. #38
    Feel It
    Solar Ice's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2010
    Location

    Mtgthesource.com, where else? :)
    Posts

    87

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Quote Originally Posted by Admiral_Arzar View Post

    As for ANT dominating without Force? Who knows. It's quite possible to fight it with discard, and as a storm player I actually fear Stompy and Staxxx-esque strategies much more than blue (but stompy is bad because of blue decks, so I don't usually have to worry about it).
    AnT would get a huge boost if FoW was out of the picture. Though you're right, decks like Stax are far harder to beat than most blue decks, with the exception of CounterTop.deck. Stompy I don't much care about short of a live MoM with a Ethersworn Canonist on the table or a G1 Teeg.
    Quote Originally Posted by (nameless one) View Post

    Oh ya, there was that SCG article with a deck called Laxstorm. If you ask me, it reminds me more of a laxative brand and not the player (no offence to Ari Lax).

  19. #39

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Quote Originally Posted by DrJones View Post
    I think you got it wrong, combo decks become stronger because they can play Force of Will, and fact is, 90% of banned cards belonged to combo decks that used FoW to force the combo through all kinds of hate. Yeah, it sucks but it's an ugly truth.

    Or where you thinking in those other combo decks that cast a bunch of rituals? Heh, R&D confessed in an article that they keep them legal because they can put up a fight against the FoW decks, otherwise, it would just be FoW decks all day. Did you think for a moment that any deck that reliably kills you on turns 1-2 would be legal otherwise?

    If you still don't understand why free countermagic is destroying the format, you could also read this article that sums it nicely. It's the section: "What happens when everybody plays duress", but I also urge you to read the section "Are we speeding offtrack or did we already crash and are already dead?".
    Yes we all know how you (DrJones) wants to see FoW Banned.

    Funny how you mention the SCG article by Brian Demars saying Vintage is too fast due to the 'free' counterspells, and fail to even mention the various articles by arguably better players that argue against it one of which is found here http://www.eternal-central.com/?p=2333. Mr. Menendian himself stating and I quote "Although Brian’s article is well written (from a rhetorical and literary perspective), and entertaining, ultimately his argument is poorly conceived, badly reasoned, and, most importantly, factually wrong. Put simply, free spells don’t necessarily create a faster format. Nor have the free spells printed recently done so as a factual matter"
    Last edited by crovakiet; 11-09-2011 at 08:56 PM. Reason: messed up quote

  20. #40

    Re: [Feature Article] – The Legacy of Brainstorm

    Please ban FoW so I can sling belcher all day long with ease. Or ANT or TES or what have you.

    I knew you would post FoW to be the next banning knowing you DrJones. And foil isn't a legitimate card because it's a 3 for 1 and no one would run it. Disrupting shoal is also awful as fuck to replace it. Pact of negation costs 5 mana or 0 mana if you win the turn you cast it.

    I'm against banning brainstorm; but knowing WotC they'll ban it anyways just to fuck up my blue decks and make a lot of the playerbase angry.

    Also DragonFireheart who said EDH players would scoop up all the duals if some number of legacy players quit? There is no way to know this for sure unless it happened and you tracked the sale of every single dual land and asked the buyer of said dual what they would use it for. I'm guessing most would say legacy.
    Bread Connoisseur on MTGSalvation Forums
    Currently Playing:
    All flavors of storm combo
    Quote Originally Posted by Vacrix
    Lands is a joke for Solidarity. Its like asking a morbidly obese parapalegic to run the mile with his shoes tied.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)