Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

  1. #1

    Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    Hello everyone, some great players and I are working on a new eternal format called Noble. You can find the original post explaining the format here: http://tappedout.net/mtg-decks/intro...-the-format-1/. We are also creating a website that will be available in the near future.

    In a nutshell, Noble decks contain 1 rare/mythic that you have access to at the beginning of the game (similar to the Commander in EDH but doesn't go back to the command zone), up to 4 uncommons, and all remaining cards are commons.

    I need the best possible legacy builders to help us establish a banned list for the format. I'm not directly looking for suggestions for the banned list. Rather, I'm looking for your opinion of who on this forum are the best competitive builders, and I would very much like those users to help create the most competitive decks possible.

    For the purposes of this exercise, I will ask that the deckbuilders ignore the current banned list. Make decks with Yawgmoth's Will, Glimpse of Nature, Hermit Druid, Ad Nauseam, Channel, anything. But please bear in mind that these decks will also be in competition with yours. I realize this is a strange request to make, but I am looking for competitive decks, not just decks that the average user thinks are competitive. What deck would you bring to a tournament?

    So I would be very grateful if you would please let me know who the best builders are, and if you are one of these fine individuals, I would very much appreciate your help in creating the most competetive decks possible. Please either post them in this thread or create them on tappedout.net and refer me to them. (Noble is a selectable format on TappedOut, hence the best place to build these decks).

    I very much appreciate the community's help in this endeavor. Thanks very much for your time!

  2. #2

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    I like this format. Unbeatable goblin charbelcher decks? Sign me up!

  3. #3
    Member
    Malchar's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Roseville, MN
    Posts

    946

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    The only realistic way to make a ban list is to hold a number of tournaments, wait a while, hold more tournaments, and then (reluctantly) ban the cards that are causing problems. Starting up a new format with a day 0 ban list is very unexciting for any prospective players. Also, simply designing strong decks is no indication of what needs to be banned. You should just start holding tournaments with either no ban list, or using the legacy ban list for starters if you insist. After you have top 8 results from a number of large tournaments, you can look and clearly see if something needs to be banned.

    It looks like an interesting format, and I may try to design some decks later when I have time. I'm stuck on the hard choice of whether I want to start the game with tolarian academy or mishra's workshop in play, and do I run 4x strip mine or 4x sol ring?

  4. #4
    Don't ping the hydra
    DrJones's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2007
    Location

    Spain
    Posts

    107,480

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    I think magic games aren't that interesting when you can start with any one spell in your hand, due to reduced variance. Also, while I have played a few games of peasant, "almost peasant" doesn't look so different from it to be worth it.

    If I were to playtest for this format, I would pick Necropotence hands down. However, I think it's futile to playtest a card already in your banned list when there are plentiful reasons for it to stay banned.
    Please stop talking about whether Force of Will is broken or not. It obviously is, and rather than "the glue that holds vintage together" it would be better to call it "the rug under which you hide the filth until there's so much that you can no longer conceal it".

  5. #5
    Site Contributor
    Ziveeman's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2006
    Location

    Arizona
    Posts

    276

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    Rough draft:

    1 Forest
    4 Tinder Wall
    4 Wild Cantor
    4 Simian Spirit Guide
    4 Channel
    3 Chromatic Star
    3 Chromatic Sphere
    4 Dark Ritual
    4 Land Grant
    4 Desperate Ritual
    4 Seething Song
    4 Pyretic Ritual
    4 Manamorphose
    4 Gitaxian Probe
    4 Lotus Petal
    4 Rite of Flame

    Noble Card: 1 Goblin Charbelcher

    Not sure if it's the right direction since I just came up with it just now, but I like Channel + Belcher. It's a little light on IMS but if you mulligan into a Land Grant/Simian Spirit Guide/Lotus Petal, you basically win.
    Magic: the Gathering players in Arizona, click here!
    @mtgtwin1 on Twitter
    3 SCG Open Top 8s
    GP Denver 2013 Top 64
    GP NJ 2014 110th/4001
    AZMagicPlayers.com Legacy Series Tournament Organizer
    Random Brews/Decks Galore!

  6. #6
    Member
    Malchar's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Roseville, MN
    Posts

    946

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    If you're going for charbelcher, you definitely need protection of some kind. If we sit down and I see that you have a charbelcher revealed, I'm going to mulligan into a force of will or leyline of sanctity. Of course, the ultimate trick would be to run the 1x charbelcher in an aggro deck just to make the opponents mulligan incorrectly.

  7. #7

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    Noble: Time Vault
    Uncommons: Volatic Key
    Rest of the Deck: who gives a fuck (but probably U for countermagic)

    Time Vault/Voltaic Key is the most mindless, least interesting interaction in the history of magic. If you have anything goes, might as well be taking infinite turns.

    Honorable Mention to Black Lotus + basically anything.
    BZK! - Storm Boards

    Been there, tried that, still casting Doomsday.
    Drawing my deck for 0 mana since 2013.

  8. #8
    Keep Calm and Brainstorm
    (nameless one)'s Avatar
    Join Date

    Apr 2009
    Location

    GTA, Ontario
    Posts

    2,878

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    I guess it's safe to say that Goblin Charbelcher is on the watch list.
    I am convinced that WotC is "dumbing" the game because of all the stupid posts they come across on MTG-related forums
    Quote Originally Posted by Kyle View Post
    13NoVa plays Force of Will from his hand.
    Finglonger plays Spell Pierce from his hand.
    [10:22:43]  13NoVa: lol
    sure
    Finglonger points from his Dack Fayden to 13NoVa's Sol Ring.
    [10:23:04]  13NoVa: lol dumb ******; nice draws with retard.dec
    stupid cocksucker
    You have been kicked out of the game.

  9. #9
    Here I Rule!!!!!!!!!!
    Phoenix Ignition's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2008
    Location

    Minneapolis MN
    Posts

    2,287

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    Quote Originally Posted by graft View Post
    I need the best possible legacy builders to help us establish a banned list for the format. I'm not directly looking for suggestions for the banned list. Rather, I'm looking for your opinion of who on this forum are the best competitive builders, and I would very much like those users to help create the most competitive decks possible.

    So I would be very grateful if you would please let me know who the best builders are, and if you are one of these fine individuals, I would very much appreciate your help in creating the most competetive decks possible. Please either post them in this thread or create them on tappedout.net and refer me to them.
    Oh, this will be good.

  10. #10
    Cobra Kai Sensie
    dontbiteitholmes's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2004
    Posts

    1,721

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    If this was a real format and the first event was coming up with no known meta I would play this...

    ***NOBLE***
    1x Commandeer


    ***Lands***
    16 Island

    ***Creatures***
    4 Spellstutter Sprite
    3 Cloud of Faeries
    4 Phantasmal Bear
    4 Ninja of the Deep Hours
    4 Delver of Secrets

    ***Spells***
    3 Echoing Truth
    4 Preordain
    1 Force Spike
    4 Gitaxian Probe
    4 Force of Will
    4 Counterspell
    4 Daze

    ***Sideboard***
    3 Blue Elemental Blast
    1 Echoing Truth
    2 Stitched Drake
    1 Intervene
    3 Disrupt
    2 Serrated Arrows
    3 Weatherseed Faeries

    The sideboard would probably change after testing, but something similar to that.


    Quote Originally Posted by Malchar View Post
    The only realistic way to make a ban list is to hold a number of tournaments, wait a while, hold more tournaments, and then (reluctantly) ban the cards that are causing problems. Starting up a new format with a day 0 ban list is very unexciting for any prospective players. Also, simply designing strong decks is no indication of what needs to be banned. You should just start holding tournaments with either no ban list, or using the legacy ban list for starters if you insist. After you have top 8 results from a number of large tournaments, you can look and clearly see if something needs to be banned.

    It looks like an interesting format, and I may try to design some decks later when I have time. I'm stuck on the hard choice of whether I want to start the game with tolarian academy or mishra's workshop in play, and do I run 4x strip mine or 4x sol ring?
    Well you can obviously tell a hand full of cards that need to be banned. Then you could privately hold tournaments before releasing the format then determine which cards were obviously OP and go from there. Let me go ahead and go out on a limb and say it doesn't take play testing to know that Strip Mine needs to be banned for example.
    big links in sigs are obnoxious -PR

    Don't disrespect my dojo dude...

    Sweep the leg!

  11. #11
    (' ' '\( 0 ,o)/''')
    TheInfamousBearAssassin's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2004
    Location

    Northern Virginia
    Posts

    6,627
    For my confessions, they burned me with fire/
    And found I was for endurance made

  12. #12

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    Just goldfished this. It seems pretty dumb, but I don't think it's as dumb as what you get with either Time Vault or Glimpse of Nature + free shit. Time Vault could still play protection, and I think Glimpse of Nature might be a more consistent deck (this has to keep certain 7 card hands and try to find a green source in the top 7 cards or so via cantrips sometimes). That said, Gushbond could certainly be adapted to play some amount of countermagic I think, but I'm unsure if it'd need to invest into a different win condition at that point.

    4 Gush
    4 Merchant Scroll
    4 Ideas Unbound
    4 High Tide
    4 Brainstorm
    4 Ponder
    4 Preordain
    4 Frantic Search
    4 Impulse

    1 Chain of Vapor
    1 Grapeshot

    1 Fastbond

    4 Lotus Petal
    4 Land Grant
    12 Island
    2 Forest
    Last edited by emidln; 04-29-2012 at 11:55 AM. Reason: -Probe,+Frantic Search, thanks IBA
    BZK! - Storm Boards

    Been there, tried that, still casting Doomsday.
    Drawing my deck for 0 mana since 2013.

  13. #13
    (' ' '\( 0 ,o)/''')
    TheInfamousBearAssassin's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2004
    Location

    Northern Virginia
    Posts

    6,627

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    Needs Frantic Search.
    For my confessions, they burned me with fire/
    And found I was for endurance made

  14. #14

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    Thanks for the advice and decks guys/gals, it is much appreciated. I'll provide the lists to the Noble playtest group for evaluation.

    Quote Originally Posted by Malchar View Post
    The only realistic way to make a ban list is to hold a number of tournaments, wait a while, hold more tournaments, and then (reluctantly) ban the cards that are causing problems. --snip--
    I am inclined to agree with you, and this is actually how I originally posted the format. However, I'm caving to community pressure to come up with a ban list, hence my attempts so far. When I did come up with the original banned list, I took most of the legacy banned list, minus cards that were clearly not broken when they couldn't be played with other rares.

    Quote Originally Posted by DrJones View Post
    I think magic games aren't that interesting when you can start with any one spell in your hand, due to reduced variance. --snip-- If I were to playtest for this format, I would pick Necropotence hands down. However, I think it's futile to playtest a card already in your banned list when there are plentiful reasons for it to stay banned.
    The format was really designed for newer players, and particularly players who can't afford a deck full of top cards. So in that respect it won't always appeal to all long-time legacy players. But it's a very quick format, and people have already taken to playing it between rounds at tournaments.

    Quote Originally Posted by dontbiteitholmes View Post
    --snip--
    Well you can obviously tell a hand full of cards that need to be banned. Then you could privately hold tournaments before releasing the format then determine which cards were obviously OP and go from there. Let me go ahead and go out on a limb and say it doesn't take play testing to know that Strip Mine needs to be banned for example.
    I think we will attempt something along these lines once I can organize the community a bit. Once our website is up and running we will have a dedicated forum which should help us organize these events.


    Thanks again for your time, everyone! Sorry if I don't reply directly to everyone (very little free time), but I definitely read and contemplate everything.

  15. #15
    Cobra Kai Sensie
    dontbiteitholmes's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2004
    Posts

    1,721

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    BTW: My deck was taking into account the banned list. Without that so many decks are just stupid that I wouldn't even bother showing up.

    That said some of the cards in your ban list aren't immediately broken to me. A good starting point is probably the old peasant list, before the dirty french got a hold of it and banned everything that made the format fun.
    big links in sigs are obnoxious -PR

    Don't disrespect my dojo dude...

    Sweep the leg!

  16. #16
    (previously Metalwalker)
    GGoober's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2008
    Location

    Houston, TX
    Posts

    1,647

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    Awww, I read the rules makes me sad because I was going to say:

    Noble: Bazaar of Baghdad
    Deck: Dredge

    That would be busted LOL.
    Decks that I care about:
    Steel Stompy
    UWx Landstill
    Dreadstalker
    DDFT (10% practice)

    Mangara on MWS? You must be masochistic. -kiblast
    Quote Originally Posted by Gheizen64 View Post
    REB is a fantastic sideboard card against blue... in blue decks :/

  17. #17
    Drinks to much coke
    Picc's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2010
    Location

    London Ontario
    Posts

    140

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    Quote Originally Posted by Metalwalker View Post
    Awww, I read the rules makes me sad because I was going to say:

    Noble: Bazaar of Baghdad
    Deck: Dredge

    That would be busted LOL.
    But not worse then, Noble: Vault mull to key, Noble:Fireball, mull to channel, Noble Tinker etc etc. Busted is very relative when were talking about what (with no banned list) is a variant of vintage.

  18. #18
    Cobra Kai Sensie
    dontbiteitholmes's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2004
    Posts

    1,721

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    Quote Originally Posted by Picc View Post
    But not worse then, Noble: Vault mull to key, Noble:Fireball, mull to channel, Noble Tinker etc etc. Busted is very relative when were talking about what (with no banned list) is a variant of vintage.
    Ironically I think the more cards are banned the worse my deck is LOL.

    After messing around with this for a hour or so it's too much like Peasant with an extra layer of stupid. You guys should really put your energy into offline Pauper or reintroduce Peasant.
    big links in sigs are obnoxious -PR

    Don't disrespect my dojo dude...

    Sweep the leg!

  19. #19

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    Noble: Yawgmoth's Bargain

    Uncommons:
    4 Tendrils of Agony

    Rest of the Deck:
    4 Dark Ritual
    4 Cabal Ritual
    4 Rite of Flame
    4 Seething Song
    4 Lotus Petal
    4 Manamorphose
    4 Gitaxian Probe
    4 Duress
    4 Chromatic Sphere
    4 Frantic Search

    4 Saprazzan Skerry
    4 Sandstone Needle
    4 Peat Bog
    2 Island
    2 Swamp

    Quick off the top of my head, like a powered up version of TPPS... sure there's a better version that could be built. (and it's probably a bit to far to the "fair" side for a format with stuff like channel/fastbond/time vault.)
    Swim, Bike, Run, MTG

  20. #20

    Re: Looking for top Legacy Builders for new Format

    Noble: Tolarian Academy
    Uncommons: 4 Skullclamp

    4 Myr Moonvessel
    4 Vault Skirge
    3 Etherium Sculptor
    4 Cloud of Faeries
    4 Disciple of the Vault
    4 Ornithopter

    4 Cranial Plating
    4 Chromatic Sphere
    4 Chromatic Star
    4 Lotus Petal
    4 Springleaf Drum

    4 Frantic Search
    1 Essence Harvest

    4 Seat of the Synod
    4 Vault of Whispers

    I goldfished this deck yesterday and it was a consistent turn 2/3 win, often with drawing your entire deck to kill via disciples or a final essence harvest with cranial platings activations. And beatdown is an incredible plan B.

    If you want this to become a real format I would ban the most broken stuff off the bat as now it will just be who can goldfish the fastest/most consistently. Either broken stuff or some form of protection like mindbreak trap seems the best noble. If you choose leyline of sanctity as your noble can you start with that on the battlefield?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)