Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 24

Thread: Miracles simulation results

  1. #1
    Member
    Gui's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    Brasil
    Posts

    1,073

    Miracles simulation results

    Disclaimer: This is not a thread intended to hype on how Miracles are Broken, nor a thread to Bash Miracles, which is as much hype as the hype itself.

    This is a thread about an idea I had, and some results I got through software simulation.

    I made the following test:
    • Draw 7 cards;
    • See how many useless miracles you have;
    • See how many miracles you can fix on opening hand;
    • Proceed drawing and incrementing useful counter;
    • Reshuffle and repeat this several times (I repeated it 100000x for each result shown bellow);
    • Return the relative number of times miracles are useful (useful/(useless+useful))


    My simulation took into account:
    • Whenever you draw a miracle via natural way, you can cast it;
    • If you drew it on your opening hand, you can't cast it unless you fix it with brainstorm;
    • If you have a Force of Will, or whichever pitch effect to fix it, the miracle wasn't useless, even tho it didn't work as intended, so I consider it to be useful;
    • The longer the game goes, more times the miracles are going to be useful.


    I did this same simulation for 0, 4 and 8 fixing cards (like: 0, or 4 brainstorms, or 4 brainstorms + 4 FoW), up to 7 draws (roughtly 8 turns).

    Here are my results:

    1 Draw
    For 1 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 12% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 12,4% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 12,8% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 12,7% of the time
    For 1 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 65% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 56,2% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 51,4% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 48,4% of the time
    For 1 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 85,4% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 78,4% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 73,5% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 69,8% of the time

    2 Draws
    For 1 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 22,3% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 22,3% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 22,3% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 22,1% of the time
    For 1 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 78,4% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 69,6% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 64,1% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 59,8% of the time
    For 1 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 92,5% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 87,1% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 82,8% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 79,5% of the time

    3 Draws
    For 1 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 29,9% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 30,5% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 29,9% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 30,4% of the time
    For 1 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 85,7% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 77,2% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 72,3% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 68,4% of the time
    For 1 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 95,6% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 91,8% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 88,4% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 85,6% of the time

    4 Draws
    For 1 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 36,8% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 36,2% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 36,3% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 36,2% of the time
    For 1 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 89,9% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 83% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 78,4% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 74,8% of the time
    For 1 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 97% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 94,5% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 91,9% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 89,5% of the time

    5 Draws
    For 1 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 41,6% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 41,5% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 41,6% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 41,5% of the time
    For 1 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 92,3% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 87% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 82,9% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 79,5% of the time
    For 1 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 97,9% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 95,9% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 94,1% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 92,4% of the time

    6 Draws
    For 1 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 46% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 46,2% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 46,2% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 46,2% of the time
    For 1 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 94,3% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 89,9% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 86,1% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 83,5% of the time
    For 1 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 98,6% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 97% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 95,6% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 94,2% of the time

    7 Draws
    For 1 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 50% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 50,3% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 50,2% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 0 fixing effects: Useful 50% of the time
    For 1 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 95,6% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 91,8% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 88,7% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 86,1% of the time
    For 1 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 99,2% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 97,9% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 96,8% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 95,6% of the time


    Hope this helps clarifying how and when miracles are more consistent, and why playing it without Brainstorm + FoW just seems wrong.

    Any doubts, feel free to ask. As a friend of mine usually says: "Argh, Math!"

    Gui.
    Last edited by Gui; 05-07-2012 at 02:41 PM.
    If you fail to explain the reason behind your choice, technically, it's the wrong choice.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tacosnape View Post
    It's one of the ten strongest cards in Legacy. And in truth, in any deck you design, you really need to have a good reason -not- to run Wasteland.
    Zerk Thread -- Really, fun deck! ^^

  2. #2
    Member
    klaus's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2007
    Location

    Berlin, Germany
    Posts

    1,203

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    What specific insights do your numbers provide beyond "don't run Miracles w/o blue"?

  3. #3
    Member
    Gui's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    Brasil
    Posts

    1,073

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    Quote Originally Posted by klaus View Post
    What specific insights do your numbers provide beyond "don't run Miracles w/o blue"?
    Hmmm... I'd say that the fact that it almost doesn't matter if you run 1, 2 or 3 instead of 4 miracles, given that you run the same number of "fixers" is also useful.

    Also, the fact that it gets way better after a lot of turns may be an indicator to run it in control decks.

    Last, using Thunderous Wrath instead of Temporal Mastery in UR decks seems weaker to me than people seem to be realizing, even if it's a blue deck, without FoW to fix, it looks like it would be too bad most of the time.

    And besides, provide data is useful to prove points, as some people seem to believe miracles will do well without decks adjsted accordingly.

    But well, the data was helpful for me, can't blame me for sharing?
    If you fail to explain the reason behind your choice, technically, it's the wrong choice.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tacosnape View Post
    It's one of the ten strongest cards in Legacy. And in truth, in any deck you design, you really need to have a good reason -not- to run Wasteland.
    Zerk Thread -- Really, fun deck! ^^

  4. #4
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Dec 2011
    Posts

    459

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    Thank you. I find the data relevant and insightful. I had assumed TM would be better as a 1-2 of.

  5. #5
    Member

    Join Date

    Jun 2004
    Location

    Madison, WI
    Posts

    1,601

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    You're delineating the usefulness rate of drawn miracles but you're not making any effort to incorporate how often they'll be drawn. So, for instance, it looks like 1 miracle and 8 fixers is a better deal than 4 miracles and 4 fixers. But with 1 miracle, you're seeing the card in 11.66% of opening hands as opposed to 39.95% as a 4 of. Without taking both into account, the data is useless at best and misleading at worst.
    Quote Originally Posted by Draener View Post
    You know who thinks it's sweet to play against 8 different decks in an 8 round tournament? People who don't like to win, or people that play combo. This is not EDH; Legacy is a competitive environment, and it should reward skill - more so than it does.
    Quote Originally Posted by Borealis View Post
    Plow their Mom every chance you get!

  6. #6
    Cobra Kai Sensie
    dontbiteitholmes's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2004
    Posts

    1,721

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    I didn't get why that one UR Delver deck in RI at the SCG was running 1x ThunderWrath when it seems like 1x Fireblast is going to be better most of the time. Oh well.
    big links in sigs are obnoxious -PR

    Don't disrespect my dojo dude...

    Sweep the leg!

  7. #7
    Member
    Teknique's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2011
    Location

    San Francisco
    Posts

    91

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    Quote Originally Posted by dontbiteitholmes View Post
    I didn't get why that one UR Delver deck in RI at the SCG was running 1x ThunderWrath when it seems like 1x Fireblast is going to be better most of the time. Oh well.
    I think Shiels agrees based on his comment in Top 8 profiles:
    The one Thunderous Wrath I played was the only one. It could not have been worse.
    Quote Originally Posted by sdematt View Post
    Also, Burn, eat a dick sandwich. I got this for my Thopters board, just so I had an answer worth more than their deck, even if it was pimped out a bit.
    Gegengewicht, Weissagekreisel - Du bist dran.

  8. #8
    Member
    Gui's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    Brasil
    Posts

    1,073

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    Quote Originally Posted by SpikeyMikey View Post
    You're delineating the usefulness rate of drawn miracles but you're not making any effort to incorporate how often they'll be drawn. So, for instance, it looks like 1 miracle and 8 fixers is a better deal than 4 miracles and 4 fixers. But with 1 miracle, you're seeing the card in 11.66% of opening hands as opposed to 39.95% as a 4 of. Without taking both into account, the data is useless at best and misleading at worst.
    Not really. It doesn't matter if it is more or less seen in the opening hand, in this case.

    Get this scenario for example: For 1 miracles and 4 fixing effects: Useful 50,8% of the time

    It doesn't matter if I had the 1 miracle 11% of the time in my opening hand, because, for all the times it was useful, it was also useless once, statistically.

    Even if I draw it more, if I could fix them more, to the point where it's more times useful than useless, than it's more playable than the option, since it's pretty terrible to have a stuck card in hand.
    If you fail to explain the reason behind your choice, technically, it's the wrong choice.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tacosnape View Post
    It's one of the ten strongest cards in Legacy. And in truth, in any deck you design, you really need to have a good reason -not- to run Wasteland.
    Zerk Thread -- Really, fun deck! ^^

  9. #9
    Member
    Gui's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    Brasil
    Posts

    1,073

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    My apologies, I found a major bug in my testing routine:

    I didn't take into account that, whenever you draw a fixer card, you fix a dead card from opening hand. This leads to different conclusions. With these results, I can see miracles being used (as earlier results were pretty much bad.).

    Please refer to the opening post to see the right results.

    Sorry, and thanks for your time.
    If you fail to explain the reason behind your choice, technically, it's the wrong choice.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tacosnape View Post
    It's one of the ten strongest cards in Legacy. And in truth, in any deck you design, you really need to have a good reason -not- to run Wasteland.
    Zerk Thread -- Really, fun deck! ^^

  10. #10

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    Does Jace count as a Fixer?
    Quote Originally Posted by Ertai's Familiar View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DragoFireheart View Post
    Interestingly enough, I would argue that BS is the Dark Ritual in this case.
    Tom? Is that you? I thought you were going to go work on DnD?

  11. #11
    Member
    Gui's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    Brasil
    Posts

    1,073

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    Quote Originally Posted by CorpT View Post
    Does Jace count as a Fixer?
    It should, but only for after you have him in table, so only effective after 4th draw, I guess.

    SDT otoh doesn't.
    If you fail to explain the reason behind your choice, technically, it's the wrong choice.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tacosnape View Post
    It's one of the ten strongest cards in Legacy. And in truth, in any deck you design, you really need to have a good reason -not- to run Wasteland.
    Zerk Thread -- Really, fun deck! ^^

  12. #12
    Member
    Malchar's Avatar
    Join Date

    Sep 2007
    Location

    Roseville, MN
    Posts

    946

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    I think that this is the most useful statistic:
    1 Draw
    For 1 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 85,4% of the time
    I assume that running 8 fixing effects has no cost, since you would probably want to run 4 brainstorm 4 force no matter what. If you run 1 miracle, for the worst-case scenario (only 1 draw), it is still useful about 85% of the time, which isn't too bad in my opinion.

    If you want to do mana cost analysis on temporal mastery, it comes out like this:
    15% of the time it is "useless" = :5::u::u: = cmc 7
    85% of the time it is "useful" = :1::u: = cmc 2

    15%*7 + 85%*2 = 2.75

    So, the "average" cmc of temporal mastery is 2.75 (after 1 draw).
    Using a similar process, the first few values would be
    2.75 after 1 draw
    2.375 after 2 draws
    2.22 after 3 draws
    2.15 after 4 draws

    This doesn't account for the times when you use it to pitch to fow, so the correct interpretation should be that you're either able to cast a time walk for this much mana OR pitch it to fow. This also doesn't count the extra mana used to brainstorm it. Since mana costs are discrete, this might not be that useful anyway, but if you're dead-set on casting a time walk, this will tell you how much it costs.

  13. #13

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    Quote Originally Posted by klaus View Post
    What specific insights do your numbers provide beyond "don't run Miracles w/o blue"?
    Although the bulk of them are in blue, there are some plausible non-blue pitch or discard effects.

    Chrome Mox
    Blazing Shoal
    Smallpox
    Faithless Looting

  14. #14
    Member
    Gui's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    Brasil
    Posts

    1,073

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    To me, these are the most important numbers:

    For the 4th draw:
    For 1 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 97% of the time
    For 2 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 94,5% of the time
    For 3 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 91,9% of the time
    For 4 miracles and 8 fixing effects: Useful 89,5% of the time

    This is, by 3rd to 5th turn, depending on whether you had ponder or not, you have almost no drawback on running the miracles in a deck such as Canadian, using FoW, Brainstorm and Ponders (FIY, ponder is not a fixer, but helps finding one). This assures it can be played with almost no harm, so I guess it will eventually see more play.
    If you fail to explain the reason behind your choice, technically, it's the wrong choice.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tacosnape View Post
    It's one of the ten strongest cards in Legacy. And in truth, in any deck you design, you really need to have a good reason -not- to run Wasteland.
    Zerk Thread -- Really, fun deck! ^^

  15. #15
    In response: Snapcaster Mage
    catmint's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2011
    Posts

    923

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    Good work.

    Unfortunately Force as fixing only counts for Temporal Mastery and not for the white/red miracle cards.

    The math "useful" or "not useful" is not yes/no but more a grey zone. And I don't mean the obvious "how useful" is the effect of the spell in a given situation, but the situations where you want to shuffle other stuff away with Brainstorm or want to pitch another useless spell with Force.

    Anyway it shows that 2 Temporal Mastery can go in a lot of blue decks....
    Currently playing: Elves

  16. #16
    Member
    Gui's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    Brasil
    Posts

    1,073

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    Quote Originally Posted by catmint View Post
    Good work.

    Unfortunately Force as fixing only counts for Temporal Mastery and not for the white/red miracle cards.

    The math "useful" or "not useful" is not yes/no but more a grey zone. And I don't mean the obvious "how useful" is the effect of the spell in a given situation, but the situations where you want to shuffle other stuff away with Brainstorm or want to pitch another useless spell with Force.

    Anyway it shows that 2 Temporal Mastery can go in a lot of blue decks....
    Yeah, agreed, it's not about the card's effect being useful or not, but rather, how often you have a brick in your hand instead of a card. This is the main drawback for miracles, imho.

    There are other drawbacks too, like, having to cast it ASAP, or having the mana to use it.

    Also, there are others (or at least sort of) 'fixers' available, like Pirokinesis or Chrome Mox, or cards like Faithless Looting, that can be used instead of FoW. The problem is that Brainstorm is the best one available anyways.
    If you fail to explain the reason behind your choice, technically, it's the wrong choice.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tacosnape View Post
    It's one of the ten strongest cards in Legacy. And in truth, in any deck you design, you really need to have a good reason -not- to run Wasteland.
    Zerk Thread -- Really, fun deck! ^^

  17. #17
    Member

    Join Date

    Mar 2010
    Location

    Canada, New-Brunswick
    Posts

    133

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    Well done Gui!

    Your simple analysis is like an oasis in a swamp of speculation :P

  18. #18
    Member
    Gui's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2006
    Location

    Brasil
    Posts

    1,073

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    Quote Originally Posted by SpeedOfDark View Post
    Well done Gui!

    Your simple analysis is like an oasis in a swamp of speculation :P
    Thanks. But to be honest, what bothers me most is the discussion between the Doomsayers and the Naysayers, in which either part treat the opposing part as clueless.
    At least I tryed to add some info to the discussion.
    If you fail to explain the reason behind your choice, technically, it's the wrong choice.

    Quote Originally Posted by Tacosnape View Post
    It's one of the ten strongest cards in Legacy. And in truth, in any deck you design, you really need to have a good reason -not- to run Wasteland.
    Zerk Thread -- Really, fun deck! ^^

  19. #19
    Member

    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Location

    Leicester, UK
    Posts

    609

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    Great. Thanks for doing the hard work. I shall have a study of this later.
    My Legacy Decks of choice: Pox, Miracles, D&T or Lands.
    Online Trading Reference Checker

  20. #20

    Re: Miracles simulation results

    For some reason, I read the topic title as "Miracle stimulation results".

    My next question would have been "up the butt?"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)