I agree with this although I would like to clarify that liliana cant be show and tell'd into play like O-ring (not sure if thats what you meant?). Probably obvious to everyone else here but I screwed someone over by accident with this play not so long ago..heh sorry dude.As for junk, the reason for the 4th liliana is that they are practically oblivion rings against show and tell and reanimator. And they are backbreaking to resolve against most "fair," decks.
You don't like my writing style? Don't read it. But I don't exactly see people wanting to read your thoughts. I may not be the greatest writer but I have plenty of results. I've also been around long enough to have plenty of experiences and interactions with knowing what works and what doesn't.
There's a big difference between Lilliana and Brainstorm. Brainstorm doesn't clog hands and isn't a dead card in multiples. That's why I was suggesting three Lilliana, it's essentially useless in the fundamental turns of legacy.
As for Top, I've addressed my opinions previously.
After Ghent the Junk deck and one of the miracle decks caught my eye, so I built them. The Junk deck does want 4 tops, it has 8 discard effects and 3 mox diamonds which can be terrible topdecks. One of the easiest ways the Junk deck loses is stripping the opps hand then running out of steam (9 creatures/3 souls, only bob for draw) as they topdeck removal and a creature while Junk draws mox, land, discard.
Edit - Given the specific nature of this Junk deck, I would much rather have the luxury of spinning a top and frowning while drawing a redundant top versus living off my library and bricking off.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)