He got angry because we have 4-ish pages of commentary about the article, and it was poorly written, poorly thought-out, and annoying.
Really...you felt the time to use whatever soapbox you have for being an internet writer guy to complain about people accidentally rotating your deck 180 degrees when cutting/shuffling? Really?
Really?
I heartily second IBA's comments.
The whole thing could have been just:
"1: Don't slow-play. 2: Be considerate of other peoples' feelings. 3: I'm a tournament savvy guy who gets frustrated with people who aren't on the same wavelength as me, which is ironic given suggestion number 2."
I like when the opponent "still-had-all-deez"es me on G1. I can scout his hand and understand his play priority all in one single stupid act. :D
I disagree that playing even when game is lost is wrong, at least G1 & G2, because I can still grab info from these.
All the rest of the article makes perfect sense to me. Would be great if people were less arrogant.
If you fail to explain the reason behind your choice, technically, it's the wrong choice.
Zerk Thread -- Really, fun deck! ^^
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)