Going Rogue and Gaming Expected Behavior
This is Ryan Overturf's followup to his previous article, A Net-Decker’s Paradise, or Why Not to Go Rogue in Legacy.
I think that he's 100% on with this: "Don’t Build Something That Loses to the Same Hate That Already Exists in the Format at Large"
As an advocate for Food Chain Griffins (shush), I feel that Abrupt Decay is going to really hamper the deck's enchantment derived winning if BG becomes a more prominent color combo.
What underutilized strategies for winning are out there right now that don't see a ton of versatile hate?
Currently playing Manipulate Fates. Learn about the Magic Card Market.
I did something similar a few years back with a BUG countertop. No counters except the 'balance and I filled the rest of that space with creatures and removal. People still played around Daze and used removal poorly because they assumed I was threat light. There's a thread on it somewhere.
Yes. But then I sure hope this is common knowledge. This guy still writes about his decks as if we care within articles that ostensibly are about something greater. I really don't understand that. Considering how short the article is in the first place, I don't see how this is at all a good practice for him.I think that he's 100% on with this: "Don’t Build Something That Loses to the Same Hate That Already Exists in the Format at Large"
"Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job."
"Politicians are like diapers. They should be changed often and for the same reason."
"Governing is too important to be left to people as silly as politicians."
"Politicians were mostly people who'd had too little morals and ethics to stay lawyers."
So he wrote his intro and then the article stopped? Can someone explain to me what I supposed to read? What was this about I'm confused.
Edit: Koby it actually doesn't even talk about delver. It doesn't talk about anything.
I haven't read the article.
I probably won't.
I don't need to read another rehash of "Why RUG Is The Dog's Bollocks, and You Not Playing It Makes You A Bad Player"
EDIT: Ok, I skimmed it. When did the article begin? All I saw was an outline for actual content, without any content.
West side
Find me on MTGO as Koby or rukcus -- @MTGKoby on Twitter
* Maverick is dead. Long live Maverick!
My Legacy stream
My MTG Blog - Work in progress
My thoughts exactly. What does this have to do with Legacy Rogue? Jesus tapdancing christ...
My web site, www.TheWorldExposed.com
I think he almost had a good point there, with the "Don’t Build Something That Loses to the Same Hate That Already Exists in the Format at Large" bit. If you're going rogue by building a(nother) graveyard-reliant combo or aggro deck, then you are going to die to the same stuff that kills dredge and reanimator.
I don't feel he actually made his point though, he just got sidetracked with an anecdote about some deck he played which lead to a bit about people playing around mana leaks he didn't have.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)