Page 20 of 26 FirstFirst ... 10161718192021222324 ... LastLast
Results 381 to 400 of 508

Thread: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

  1. #381
    bruizar
    Guest

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    it can be burning wished for in nic fit..

  2. #382

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    Gaze of Granite pretty terrible. The problem is not that it clears the board for 6-7 mana, its the fact that because it costs so much that you cant play around daze or spell pierce.

  3. #383

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    Quote Originally Posted by GradStudentGuy View Post
    Gaze of Granite pretty terrible. The problem is not that it clears the board for 6-7 mana, its the fact that because it costs so much that you cant play around daze or spell pierce.
    It's not terrible, but that is the one enormous problem with it in Legacy.

    With Deed you can drop it safely without having to pay the X portion of the cost - or right after checking the opponent's hand with Therapy or some such - to avoid Spell Pierce/Daze. Because of the all-at-once nature of the casting cost, you're going to get absolutely wrecked by RUG and whatnot when they tax you after you put in a ton of mana.

    To put it another way, you might be able to play it properly around countermagic against decks with low curves, but Pernicious Deed is just plain better against all those decks - obvious exception of RUG with stifle - because you don't have to worry about wiping walkers and Deed wipes everything else cheaper.
    Last edited by HPB_Eggo; 04-20-2013 at 07:10 PM.

  4. #384

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    http://www.wizards.com/magic/tcg/art...agonsmaze/cig#

    Full set is out. I don't see much.

  5. #385
    Member

    Join Date

    Jun 2008
    Location

    Denver, CO
    Posts

    95

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    Yeah, very disappointing

    Too many over-costed cards.

  6. #386

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    This set is worse than gatecrash in terms of legacy playable cards and that is saying something.

  7. #387

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    Quote Originally Posted by dameus View Post
    Yeah, very disappointing

    Too many over-costed cards.
    Yeah, Gatecrash is pretty bad. Here's hoping Dragon's Maze is better...

    OH WAIT

    I guess this set is a fitting way to end this block: lazy, phoned in, and with an extra mana tacked on to everything.

    Also, the rare blue cipher card is lulzy.

  8. #388

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    Quote Originally Posted by Aggro_zombies View Post
    Yeah, Gatecrash is pretty bad. Here's hoping Dragon's Maze is better...

    OH WAIT

    I guess this set is a fitting way to end this block: lazy, phoned in, and with an extra mana tacked on to everything.

    Also, the rare blue cipher card is lulzy.
    I dont get that card at all... I mean why is it a rare can it really mess up limited that bad as a common?

  9. #389

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    Quote Originally Posted by GradStudentGuy View Post
    I dont get that card at all... I mean why is it a rare can it really mess up limited that bad as a common?
    Pretty much all of the cards with that effect are rare, so that's not the issue. It's that:

    1) Dimir was generally shafted in this block, thanks to overcosted cipher cards and grind,

    2) The card does very little in this block,

    3) The card has very little to gain from being a cipher card operating at sorcery-speed.

    It's just...cipher was unappealing enough as it was, why compound the problem by making a card like this? IIRC there was already a card with similar effect and buyback in Tempest and that thing is so forgettable I can't even remember its name.

  10. #390
    Member
    BlackFlameAshura's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2013
    Location

    Tampa, FL
    Posts

    33

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!



    Skylasher 1
    Creature - Insect (Rare)
    Flash
    Can't be countered.
    Protection from blue, reach.
    2/2

    Wow, DGM is kinda disappointing overall and I may have jumped the gun a little earlier with Voice of Resurgence but this guy seems legitimately solid. He's definitely gonna see some eternal play but the question becomes how does he stack up compared to Scryb Ranger? I'm not entirely sold on him just yet because Scryb Ranger offers actual flying and utility in handling Wastes and such but Skylasher's inability to be countered and that it actually kills flipped Delvers and Geists rather than merely blocking them can't really be overlooked, I think. I suppose it's the sort of thing where it might be more of a meta and play style call over anything.

    EDIT: Guess I'm a bit late to the party on this one. Didn't even realize he'd already been leaked a few days ago.
    Main deck: Maverick
    Secondary decks: High Tide // Affinity
    MTGO decks: Affinity

  11. #391
    (' ' '\( 0 ,o)/''')
    TheInfamousBearAssassin's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2004
    Location

    Northern Virginia
    Posts

    6,627

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    It's a two mana answer to a one mana card that does almost nothing else and dies to every actually played removal spell in the format except Force of Will which no one would use on him anyway.
    For my confessions, they burned me with fire/
    And found I was for endurance made

  12. #392
    (' ' '\( 0 ,o)/''')
    TheInfamousBearAssassin's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2004
    Location

    Northern Virginia
    Posts

    6,627

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    I will probably play Gaze although it is terrible.

    So uh, set verdict: Upgrade to Disenchant if you're splashing red? Whooooot.
    For my confessions, they burned me with fire/
    And found I was for endurance made

  13. #393

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    What did You think guys about Notion Thief ? Any Chance to see play as a sideboard card ?

  14. #394
    Member

    Join Date

    Apr 2007
    Location

    Leicester, UK
    Posts

    609

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    Quote Originally Posted by TheInfamousBearAssassin View Post
    I will probably play Gaze although it is terrible.

    So uh, set verdict: Upgrade to Disenchant if you're splashing red? Whooooot.
    Yeah...
    Best card of the set: Wear/Tear.
    Worth trying out: Gaze, Skylasher, Nocturn Theif, Hidden Strings
    My Legacy Decks of choice: Pox, Miracles, D&T or Lands.
    Online Trading Reference Checker

  15. #395

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    In all seriousness, I'm kind of impressed at just how badly GTC and DGM sucked compared to RtR and the original RGD. I mean, to throw that much coasting into your most popular world after starting it off so strongly, balls. Big brass ones. No way any of the peeps at wotc are walking straight today. Just hopping around on the clangers like it's a south park episode.

  16. #396
    Member
    Barook's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2007
    Location

    Germany, Germering, Munich
    Posts

    7,496

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    Quote Originally Posted by morgan_coke View Post
    In all seriousness, I'm kind of impressed at just how badly GTC and DGM sucked compared to RtR and the original RGD. I mean, to throw that much coasting into your most popular world after starting it off so strongly, balls. Big brass ones. No way any of the peeps at wotc are walking straight today. Just hopping around on the clangers like it's a south park episode.
    I'm also suprised how stuff like Mindstatic (Manaleak for , CC: ) and Warleader's Helix made it through development.

    Those are terribly uninspiring designs.

  17. #397
    (' ' '\( 0 ,o)/''')
    TheInfamousBearAssassin's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2004
    Location

    Northern Virginia
    Posts

    6,627

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    I mean to be honest, the original Ravnica block was one of the more underwhelming blocks for Eternal formats, certainly outside of Ravnica itself.

    The design was really fun and interesting though. Those sets were full of cards that you knew weren't Legacy viable but wanted to play anyway. Fuck, that's probably why EDH got invented.

    This set? It's complete dogshit, I don't want to play 90% of these cards in any format and have no idea why they were printed. Lazy, shitty design.
    For my confessions, they burned me with fire/
    And found I was for endurance made

  18. #398
    ಠ_ಠ
    Pastorofmuppets's Avatar
    Join Date

    Jul 2009
    Location

    NJ
    Posts

    1,125

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    Quote Originally Posted by morgan_coke View Post
    In all seriousness, I'm kind of impressed at just how badly GTC and DGM sucked compared to RtR and the original RGD. I mean, to throw that much coasting into your most popular world after starting it off so strongly, balls. Big brass ones. No way any of the peeps at wotc are walking straight today. Just hopping around on the clangers like it's a south park episode.
    Well, considering Wizards essentially "killed off" Dominaria long ago, you'd have to figure that their primary business model seems to be taking the basic concept of the game into new types of stories, following the same "memes" of M:tG.
    Like, Innistrad and Zendikar were sick nasty. To be completely honest, I'd be happy if there was never a return to either of those because the story has already been written on those parchments.
    I can also understand how it might be slightly easier to put the post-time spiral "Bradywalkers" into old planes for some quick and easy-to-design sets. Just make a bunch of references to old cards (Helix, for example) to shut up the fanboys and then move on. Ravnica fanboys in particular are the worst. There's something about the people who are super-attached to the fluff behind the guilds and whatnot that just upsets me. They're like the soccer moms with those stick-figure sticker effigies of their families on the back window of their minivans of the M:tG fandom.
    Quote Originally Posted by TsumiBand View Post
    ... It feels like a bummer to spend so much time not talking about the game and more time arguing over whether Dega or Mardu is the better name for a three color deck you'll never see in Legacy.

  19. #399
    DocteurGabe
    Kayradis's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2013
    Location

    Halifax, NS, Canada
    Posts

    873

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    Quote Originally Posted by Pastorofmuppets View Post
    They're like the soccer moms with those stick-figure sticker effigies of their families on the back window of their minivans of the M:tG fandom.

    I lol'ed.
    Quote Originally Posted by Lemnear View Post
    I facepalm so hard in Public that hipsters gonna make this a new trend

  20. #400
    Site Contributor

    Join Date

    Jul 2011
    Location

    Maastricht, NL
    Posts

    2,511

    Re: [DGM] New Set spoiler discussion!

    Only crappy stuff, nothing that will affect the Legacy meta.
    But I'm actually pretty happy about that. I'm not particularly rich right now.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)