Page 263 of 313 FirstFirst ... 163213253259260261262263264265266267273 ... LastLast
Results 5,241 to 5,260 of 6252

Thread: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

  1. #5241

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    I was thinking recently about fatal push. D&T is going down I think, after the explosion of conspiracy 2. Three cards in the sideboard for them (2 dread, 1 massacre) are indead too much, I think I will add a single FP to try.

  2. #5242

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    I've been trying the same thing. Against BUG Delver having the option to kill Deathrite to open PiF back up if you don't have infinite mana, or to kill Delver to keep Ad Nauseam alive as an option, or to kill Leovold so they don't draw a million cards, it seems very useful. It's a damn shame to have to include a removal spell, but I think that's where we are.

  3. #5243
    WTP's Choice
    CabalTherapy's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2010
    Location

    Berlin, Germany
    Posts

    685

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
    I've been trying the same thing. Against BUG Delver having the option to kill Deathrite to open PiF back up if you don't have infinite mana, or to kill Delver to keep Ad Nauseam alive as an option, or to kill Leovold so they don't draw a million cards, it seems very useful. It's a damn shame to have to include a removal spell, but I think that's where we are.
    "Creature decks" or decks that win creatures that are played from hand and attack (Maro stlye) are as strong as they have been (although we see less vanilas making removals more relevant) but now Push punishes them even more for their suboptimal deck choice.
    WantToPonder
    former: Team SpasticalAction & Team RugStar Berlin
    Team MTG Berlin

    Quote Originally Posted by guillemnicolau View Post
    Since the print of dark petition grim tutor hasn't seen play in legacy (not in competitive decks).
    Quote Originally Posted by THerzog41 View Post
    I believe Maverick is still the best deck in the format and definitely the most underrated deck in the format.
    The Dragonstorm
    http://www.mtgthesource.com/forums/s...he-Dragonstorm

  4. #5244
    Member
    Sibelius's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2014
    Location

    London
    Posts

    156

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by Sibelius View Post
    Thought this might exercise some of your brains.
    Miracles vs Storm. We are Miracles and the Storm player is going off. What do we do? And Why?

    https://thelibraryatpendrellvale.com...cles-vs-storm/

    Sib
    So here is the Answer as I see it. Thanks for all the input on the forums, I read all of your ideas.

    https://thelibraryatpendrellvale.com...storm-answers/

    Sib

  5. #5245
    Draw-Go Disciple
    Nestalim's Avatar
    Join Date

    Feb 2017
    Location

    Clermont-Ferrand
    Posts

    87

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    Hey guys,

    I've seen a lot of ANT list with 1 or 2 Tendrils in their sideboard, I was wondering, but I can't figure the reason to have more than one copy.

    I identify some scenario, like discard - Drs on it, or tons of mana hand with Tutor + one tendrils into a second tendrils, but more reasons would be appreciated.

  6. #5246
    Member
    Douif's Avatar
    Join Date

    Oct 2015
    Location

    Paris
    Posts

    55

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by Nestalim View Post
    Hey guys,

    I've seen a lot of ANT list with 1 or 2 Tendrils in their sideboard, I was wondering, but I can't figure the reason to have more than one copy.

    I identify some scenario, like discard - Drs on it, or tons of mana hand with Tutor + one tendrils into a second tendrils, but more reasons would be appreciated.
    Actually, the main reason of additional tendrils in the sideboard is to be able to grind your opponent, especially vs miracles where you play a grinding station game in g2/g3, or against decks like UR Delver/Burn, where you can play small tendrils in order to gain time against all their burn spells, and kill them with another tendrils some turns later.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spam View Post
    Goyfs from MM are like the last kid you pick in a kindergarten soccer match.
    You know he sucks, he knows, everybody knows, but you still need him to play.

  7. #5247

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo



    1, storm 1, landdrop made, opponent has SE in hand, assuming you're dead if he untaps, what do you do? it's not as simple as it seems

    2, if you decided to flashback PIF, what do you SE if you'd be the opponent?

    EDIT - 3, if you cast Ad Nauseam, what do you SE if you'd be the opponent (if you decided not to wait)?
    Quote Originally Posted by Dissection View Post
    .

  8. #5248
    我不是你的英雄。
    Jonathan Alexander's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2010
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    854

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    Get LED, float B, cast Past in Flames. Opponent casts Surgical on anything but Infernal, they're dead. If they take Infernal, I'm content with 2 Probe, 2 Ponder, BBBBBB and U. If they don't Surgical, cast LED. Now they should see they have to Surgical Infernal. Proceed with cantrips, cast Ad Nauseam if that's what you hit.
    Don't mind me, i'm just writing about Pauper these days: theweeklywars.wordpress.com

    deckstats.net archive

  9. #5249
    Member
    Togores's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2011
    Location

    Madrid (Spain)
    Posts

    734

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    If you cast led they are gonna take your pif. So you just have now to cast nauseam or pif. If you wanna cast pif you have to search for a petal because they will think you got a led and surgical them in response to the pif.

    Also seeing the stormcount would help.

  10. #5250

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Alexander View Post
    Get LED, float B, cast Past in Flames. Opponent casts Surgical on anything but Infernal, they're dead. If they take Infernal, I'm content with 2 Probe, 2 Ponder, BBBBBB and U. If they don't Surgical, cast LED. Now they should see they have to Surgical Infernal. Proceed with cantrips, cast Ad Nauseam if that's what you hit.
    If I'm the opponent I'm surgicaling Past in Flames with LED on the stack. That doesn't work. You can flash back the Past in Flames without casting the LED of course, but then you've just got black mana when it comes time to do stuff, so those two probes better do work.

  11. #5251

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by Togores View Post
    If you cast led they are gonna take your pif. So you just have now to cast nauseam or pif. If you wanna cast pif you have to search for a petal because they will think you got a led and surgical them in response to the pif.

    Also seeing the stormcount would help.
    It says Stormcount 1 in the post (not the image)

  12. #5252
    Member
    Togores's Avatar
    Join Date

    Nov 2011
    Location

    Madrid (Spain)
    Posts

    734

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
    It says Stormcount 1 in the post (not the image)
    Sorry, missed it ^^

  13. #5253
    我不是你的英雄。
    Jonathan Alexander's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2010
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    854

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff View Post
    If I'm the opponent I'm surgicaling Past in Flames with LED on the stack. That doesn't work. You can flash back the Past in Flames without casting the LED of course, but then you've just got black mana when it comes time to do stuff, so those two probes better do work.
    Scratch everything I said, thought we had one more mana hahaha
    Don't mind me, i'm just writing about Pauper these days: theweeklywars.wordpress.com

    deckstats.net archive

  14. #5254

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by Sloshthedark View Post
    EDIT - 3, if you cast Ad Nauseam, what do you SE if you'd be the opponent (if you decided not to wait)?
    Math below is going to be based on what the opponent thinks we might have, not based on what we actually have. So while I know we only have 3 petals and no Dark Petition, the opponent doesn't.

    Options

    Lotus Petal - If you hit lotus petal, they absolutely have to hit both remaining LEDs to win
    LED - If you hit LED, they have to hit two Lotus Petals (one for black and one for red) and multiple rituals including 1 dark, or all 3 lotus petals and at least one cabal ritual.
    Past in Flames - They have to hit 4 of the remaining 14 Lotus Petal, LED, Dark Ritual, Cabal Ritual, Probe, and also hit the Tendrils or Dark Petition or Infernal+LED.
    Infernal Tutor - Basically the same as Past in Flames except if they hit a bunch of mana and which on the tendrils or petition, they can flash back PiF and make more mana and maybe flash back a draw spell or two if they have blue mana from the 3rd petal or LED.

    Given those options, I think I'd probably hit the Petals, but I think LED is a reasonable option as well. They both put our hero on a very limited and specific number of draws to win.

  15. #5255
    我不是你的英雄。
    Jonathan Alexander's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2010
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    854

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    So Ad Nauseam is not an option. Even without the opponent having Surgical (and you not having Past in Flames in graveyard obv) this would be highly unlikely to lead to victory.

    The only real proactive options we have are Petal and Past in Flames. Either way you end up in the same situation (Past in Flames on stack, one mana, opponent gets to Surgical). If you get Past in Flames, your deck is gonna be better (Petal over a dead Past in Flames is big). Notably, you're also in a much better position if you don't get to win this turn. The big upside Petal has is that you get to be reactive with your mana; Past in Flames forces you to decide what mana to float before casting Probes / opponent casting Surgical. Petal also wins you the game if your opponent randomly decides to Surgical LED in response to Past in Flames, but such things are hard to predict without playing the match yourself.

    If you get Petal, it's likely your opponent Surgicals Infernal in response to your first non-initial mana source (Ritual, LED). They can let your Probes and a Ponder resolve with no risk.

    If you get Past in Flames and float B, your opponent casts Surgical on Infernal when you cast a ritual and you have two Probes to hit discard or Tendrils (seven cards, Ad Nauseam is another half a card you can hit). Potentially you get to cast Ponders to dig for those if you hit Petal / LED. LED also opens up Empty, which is deece.

    If you get Past in Flames and float U, it's very hard to predict when your opponent is going to fire off Surgical, they're likely aiming it at Ponder though. You would then have to hit Petal / LED (four cards) with your Probes, and you need a way to get rid of your first card if your second Probe finds Petal.

    I like Past in Flames floating B, but my actual line would have been Infernal for Thoughtseize without cracking LED, unfortunately you didn't give us that option.
    Don't mind me, i'm just writing about Pauper these days: theweeklywars.wordpress.com

    deckstats.net archive

  16. #5256
    Member

    Join Date

    Aug 2015
    Location

    The woods again
    Posts

    1,096

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by Sloshthedark View Post


    1, storm 1, landdrop made, opponent has SE in hand, assuming you're dead if he untaps, what do you do? it's not as simple as it seems

    2, if you decided to flashback PIF, what do you SE if you'd be the opponent?

    EDIT - 3, if you cast Ad Nauseam, what do you SE if you'd be the opponent (if you decided not to wait)?
    There's a chance I'll totally whiff on this, but here's what I was thinking:

    1) Working under the assumption that we're dead regardless of what we could force the opponent to disard, I would tutor for Past in Flames and pray to hit off a Ponder/the Probes. Tutoring mana leaves them to extract PiF, leaving us dead in the water. Ad Nauseam feels too risky with Tutor, Dark Rit, and double-LED in our graveyard; even if they extract the wrong card, we've still got much lower odds of hitting what we need than I'd be comfortable with. If we get PiF, they have to Surgical it before we cast the one in our hand to stop us from cantripping, and I don't think it's likely that they'd know to hit it. Still super risky; we'd have one blue mana to find anything we could use to keep playing, and probably we wouldn't be able to Ponder for more stuff.

    If they've got a weak-ish hand, though, it might be best to tutor a Duress and knock over their combo.

    2) Best play would be to hit the Past in Flames with Tutor on the stack, though I don't think I'd have thought of that in game. If the Past in Flames resolved, I'd aim for Ponder.

    3) Lotus Petal. That forces the AdN to hit both remaining LEDs or the player's dead.
    All Spells Primer under construction: https://docs.google.com/document/d/e...Tl7utWpLo0/pub
    PM me if you want to contribute!
    Quote Originally Posted by TsumiBand View Post
    Just in time for Valentines Day 💝

    Roses are red, violets are blue
    Omae wa mou shindeiru
    Quote Originally Posted by FourDogsinaHorseSuit View Post
    Quick question, are you also still waiting for the great pumpkin it did you finally pick it in once December hit?
    Quote Originally Posted by iatee View Post
    I am tired of malicious top 8s and it is time to put an end to the practice.

  17. #5257

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Alexander View Post
    I like Past in Flames floating B, but my actual line would have been Infernal for Thoughtseize without cracking LED, unfortunately you didn't give us that option.
    If you cast Past in Flames floating B, and your opponent surgicals Dark Ritual in response, is there any way to win other than Probe Probe into LED or multiple Petals?

  18. #5258
    我不是你的英雄。
    Jonathan Alexander's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2010
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    854

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    Probe into Petal also wins because you can CRit -> Infernal -> LED -> Empty. Probe Probe into black spell + Petal also works. Basically puts you in the same position as Past in Flames floating U.

    Willing to believe getting Petal is the best play most of the time, but not willing to say I want to go for it without having played the game myself. I make these 50/50 or mindgame calls intuitively.
    Don't mind me, i'm just writing about Pauper these days: theweeklywars.wordpress.com

    deckstats.net archive

  19. #5259

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Alexander View Post
    Probe into Petal also wins because you can CRit -> Infernal -> LED -> Empty. Probe Probe into black spell + Petal also works. Basically puts you in the same position as Past in Flames floating U.

    Willing to believe getting Petal is the best play most of the time, but not willing to say I want to go for it without having played the game myself. I make these 50/50 or mindgame calls intuitively.
    As we're playing against storm and we've been instructed to believe that we're dead next turn, I was operating under the impression that Empty this turn wasn't a win.

  20. #5260
    我不是你的英雄。
    Jonathan Alexander's Avatar
    Join Date

    May 2010
    Location

    Germany
    Posts

    854

    Re: [Deck] ANT (Ad Nauseam Tendrils) Storm Combo

    Then you can cast Ponders for discard/Tendrils instead of Empty, which is still somewhat alright.

    In all seriousness, all our options are really bad here, so "it's not great" isn't exactly a reason to dismiss any of them.
    Don't mind me, i'm just writing about Pauper these days: theweeklywars.wordpress.com

    deckstats.net archive

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)