Page 76 of 147 FirstFirst ... 266672737475767778798086126 ... LastLast
Results 1,501 to 1,520 of 2929

Thread: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

  1. #1501
    jtw11632 on MTGO

    Join Date

    Aug 2013
    Posts

    81

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    With Mono Blue Omni Tell probably going away in favor of UR Sneak and Show, does anyone think Delver can handle that and Miracles? I know whenever I have played against Miracles it just seems miserable because I can't Wasteland basics, it's hard to resolve anything in the deck if even a CB gets online, not to mention if a Top is in play as well.

    Sneak and Show is a little slower and the Wastelands are ok but with their FoW backup and extra mana from Petal/Sol Lands, sometimes counters like Daze or Pierce just don't cut it. Turn out just waiting until turn 4 with 5 mana up still allows Grisel/Emrakul to win the game.

  2. #1502
    MTGO Name: Adelorenzi
    ironclad8690's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Posts

    984

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by oSeabass View Post
    With Mono Blue Omni Tell probably going away in favor of UR Sneak and Show, does anyone think Delver can handle that and Miracles? I know whenever I have played against Miracles it just seems miserable because I can't Wasteland basics, it's hard to resolve anything in the deck if even a CB gets online, not to mention if a Top is in play as well.

    Sneak and Show is a little slower and the Wastelands are ok but with their FoW backup and extra mana from Petal/Sol Lands, sometimes counters like Daze or Pierce just don't cut it. Turn out just waiting until turn 4 with 5 mana up still allows Grisel/Emrakul to win the game.
    You can always put 2 Pithing Needle in your sideboard if you fear those matchups.

  3. #1503
    Is Cancer

    Join Date

    Jul 2014
    Posts

    1,146

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by oSeabass View Post
    With Mono Blue Omni Tell probably going away in favor of UR Sneak and Show, does anyone think Delver can handle that and Miracles? I know whenever I have played against Miracles it just seems miserable because I can't Wasteland basics, it's hard to resolve anything in the deck if even a CB gets online, not to mention if a Top is in play as well.

    Sneak and Show is a little slower and the Wastelands are ok but with their FoW backup and extra mana from Petal/Sol Lands, sometimes counters like Daze or Pierce just don't cut it. Turn out just waiting until turn 4 with 5 mana up still allows Grisel/Emrakul to win the game.
    RUG always survived before; even dominated. It's decent against miracles since it packs Stifle/Goose so it can get the time needed to get there. It's decent against Sneak because it packs a sturdy number of counters and picks at the manabase with a fast clock.

    I imagine RUG will move back to 2 Forked Bolt, X Spell Pierce/Snare, x something; Moms will be incoming in droves and Pierces or Snares will be good for the blue decks as usual. Pierce seems particularly good against S&T since it takes 5-6 mana to get through it; and I assume you've been wasting, stifling, and probably sitting on a dead Daze or Force.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nestalim View Post
    Wrong. Gideon Emblem protect you from losing and you can even open your binder and slam some cards on the board, not even the HJ can DQ you now.

  4. #1504

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by tescrin View Post
    RUG always survived before; even dominated. It's decent against miracles since it packs Stifle/Goose so it can get the time needed to get there. It's decent against Sneak because it packs a sturdy number of counters and picks at the manabase with a fast clock.

    I imagine RUG will move back to 2 Forked Bolt, X Spell Pierce/Snare, x something; Moms will be incoming in droves and Pierces or Snares will be good for the blue decks as usual. Pierce seems particularly good against S&T since it takes 5-6 mana to get through it; and I assume you've been wasting, stifling, and probably sitting on a dead Daze or Force.
    Yea, as a matter of fact unless Sneak has a "god hand" I'm usually very confident in that MU (I'm running 3 pierces main). Miracles is my least favorite match up but still winnable.

  5. #1505
    Member
    Jaytron's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2015
    Location

    Norcal
    Posts

    238

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    My buddy and I went from Grixis Delver -> RUG Delver (me) and Omnitell -> Sneak (him). With Pyroblast/REB in the board, and the speed that RUG has, it's been pretty nasty for him. Sure he can sometimes have the nuts but I think RUG Delver is fine vs sneak.

    What are your guys' thoughts on the BUG Delver matchup? SB plan/general gameplay plan?

  6. #1506
    MTGO Name: Adelorenzi
    ironclad8690's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Posts

    984

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaytron View Post
    My buddy and I went from Grixis Delver -> RUG Delver (me) and Omnitell -> Sneak (him). With Pyroblast/REB in the board, and the speed that RUG has, it's been pretty nasty for him. Sure he can sometimes have the nuts but I think RUG Delver is fine vs sneak.

    What are your guys' thoughts on the BUG Delver matchup? SB plan/general gameplay plan?
    I have been having pretty good luck vs BUG Delver with 2 Spell Pierce, 2 Spell Snare, and 2 Dismember as my flex. I went down to 1 Submerge in my sideboard to make more room for Miracles hate, but I haven't really felt the effects of it too much.

    My boarding plan vs them:
    In: 2 Pyroblast, 1 Submerge, 1 Rough
    Out: 4 Force of Will

    Edit: also 1 Life from the Loam for a Pierce or something.

    I would board differently if they were on the Stifle (Hymnless) build, though I don't know why they would be.
    Last edited by ironclad8690; 10-10-2015 at 03:14 PM.

  7. #1507
    Member
    Jaytron's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2015
    Location

    Norcal
    Posts

    238

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by ironclad8690 View Post
    I have been having pretty good luck vs BUG Delver with 2 Spell Pierce, 2 Spell Snare, and 2 Dismember as my flex. I went down to 1 Submerge in my sideboard to make more room for Miracles hate, but I haven't really felt the effects of it too much.

    My boarding plan vs them:
    In: 2 Pyroblast, 1 Submerge, 1 Rough
    Out: 4 Force of Will

    I would board differently if they were on the Stifle (Hymnless) build, though I don't know why they would be.
    Interesting, I'm running 2 Forked Bolt instead of Dismember. Do you like Dismember more? Meta call?

    Rough vs BuG is to kill off DRS and unflipped delvers? Would you bring in rough vs Shardless for DRS/resolved agents?

  8. #1508
    Member

    Join Date

    May 2015
    Location

    TX
    Posts

    10

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    i finally threw this list together for my local legacy and got destroyed by dredge and affinity... lol bad night

  9. #1509

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by ironclad8690 View Post
    Can you explain your reasoning as to why you Clique'd him when you did? Wouldn't it be better to wait and until he is almost hellbent?
    The idea behind playing Vendilion Clique there is that his combo is most vulnerable then. Essentially with only 2 lands out (sea and island) and playing the Dark Ritual that's when he's most bottlenecked on mana. Having played storm now something that I never thought of is how powerful it is to Vendilion Clique a ritual out of their hand. Since the deck uses Past In Flames taking a ritual is often back breaking if they're going to use that line. In addition to do the tutor chain lines you often need upwards of 3 rituals/artifact mana which means they probably only have one business spell. By playing Vendilion Clique in response to the first ritual you can take the important second ritual or their business spell and probably ruin their whole turn along with blanking the first ritual.

    Another upside that I hadn't really thought of is that Vendilion Clique was known information at the time. If Storm is stuck on mana the turn they go off they'll use a ritual and then a discard spell with some black mana floating. It hadn't occurred to me at the time that he must have had Cabal Therapy to deal with Vendilion Clique or multiple business and mana spells to make it irrelevant. I actually think for him a better line may have been to lead on double Lion's Eye Diamond into Dark Ritual. I would have played Vendilion Clique in response to his Dark Ritual and he could have cracked his Lion's Eye Diamond:

    2x LED + Dark Ritual = bbb + rrr + uuu storm 4 (counting vendilion Clique
    Past in Flames b + uuu storm 5
    Dark ritual bbb + uuu storm 6
    Gitaxian Probe bbb + uuu storm 7
    Ponder bbb + uu storm 8 (needing to rip any +1 mana source and he did have his land drop)
    Dark Petition Storm 9 -> Tendrils of Agony GG

    This actually makes it really interesting because now realizing that he knew about vendilion clique it almost seems dependent on his sequencing.

  10. #1510
    MTGO Name: Adelorenzi
    ironclad8690's Avatar
    Join Date

    Mar 2009
    Posts

    984

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaytron View Post
    Interesting, I'm running 2 Forked Bolt instead of Dismember. Do you like Dismember more? Meta call?

    Rough vs BuG is to kill off DRS and unflipped delvers? Would you bring in rough vs Shardless for DRS/resolved agents?
    Yeah, basically I see Rough as just another way to deal with Deathrite Shaman. DRS living is so contrary to our mana denial plan, which I feel is the strongest way to attack BUG delver (keep off double black, keep off of 3 mana etc).

    Quote Originally Posted by Contract Killer View Post
    The idea behind playing Vendilion Clique there is that his combo is most vulnerable then. Essentially with only 2 lands out (sea and island) and playing the Dark Ritual that's when he's most bottlenecked on mana. Having played storm now something that I never thought of is how powerful it is to Vendilion Clique a ritual out of their hand. Since the deck uses Past In Flames taking a ritual is often back breaking if they're going to use that line. In addition to do the tutor chain lines you often need upwards of 3 rituals/artifact mana which means they probably only have one business spell. By playing Vendilion Clique in response to the first ritual you can take the important second ritual or their business spell and probably ruin their whole turn along with blanking the first ritual.

    Another upside that I hadn't really thought of is that Vendilion Clique was known information at the time. If Storm is stuck on mana the turn they go off they'll use a ritual and then a discard spell with some black mana floating. It hadn't occurred to me at the time that he must have had Cabal Therapy to deal with Vendilion Clique or multiple business and mana spells to make it irrelevant. I actually think for him a better line may have been to lead on double Lion's Eye Diamond into Dark Ritual. I would have played Vendilion Clique in response to his Dark Ritual and he could have cracked his Lion's Eye Diamond:

    2x LED + Dark Ritual = bbb + rrr + uuu storm 4 (counting vendilion Clique
    Past in Flames b + uuu storm 5
    Dark ritual bbb + uuu storm 6
    Gitaxian Probe bbb + uuu storm 7
    Ponder bbb + uu storm 8 (needing to rip any +1 mana source and he did have his land drop)
    Dark Petition Storm 9 -> Tendrils of Agony GG

    This actually makes it really interesting because now realizing that he knew about vendilion clique it almost seems dependent on his sequencing.
    That makes sense. Aside from rituals everything else is sorcery speed, so that would be when he is most vulnerable.

  11. #1511

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    How has everyone been liking snare? I'm playing a legacy event this weekend and might try it out. I've been on 3 pierce, 1 dismember, 2 forked as my flex slots. I night try 2/2 snare and pierce split with 2 forked. I just don't want to give up more pierces against SNT. I am on 3 pyroblast sideboard so maybe that can make up for it.

  12. #1512

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by eyeownyu View Post
    How has everyone been liking snare? I'm playing a legacy event this weekend and might try it out. I've been on 3 pierce, 1 dismember, 2 forked as my flex slots. I night try 2/2 snare and pierce split with 2 forked. I just don't want to give up more pierces against SNT. I am on 3 pyroblast sideboard so maybe that can make up for it.
    It's definitely one of my favorite counters aside from the stock Force/Daze/Stifle. It consistently does what it does no matter what stage of the game it is. I find this really useful because once you're ahead you can just hold it up and not have to worry about if it's still live. Against delver decks once you get a clock established you can counter Goyf/YP to stay uncontested on the ground. When you play against miracles mid to late game you counter Snapcaster/Counterbalance and the occasional counterspell. These are some of the most common, but also what I consider the most impactful reasons to consider playing it.

  13. #1513

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Went 4-2 at a 62 person seattle gpt. I got 17th place :( totally could have made it into top 8.

    I was playing the stock 54 plus 1 dismember, 2 forked, 3 pierce. I'll try to write a report afyer work today.

  14. #1514

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by eyeownyu View Post
    Went 4-2 at a 62 person seattle gpt. I got 17th place :( totally could have made it into top 8.

    I was playing the stock 54 plus 1 dismember, 2 forked, 3 pierce. I'll try to write a report afyer work today.
    I play a similar flex. I cut down to one fork bolt and 2 dismember instead. For my meta it's some what of a necessity, damn Maverick

  15. #1515
    Member
    Jaytron's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2015
    Location

    Norcal
    Posts

    238

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    What are your guys' SB plans in the RUG Delver mirror?

    My flex are 2 pierce, 2 forked bolt, 2 spell snare

    SB:
    1 Grafdigger
    1 Sylvan Library
    1 Life from the Loam
    1 Ancient Grudge
    1 Krosan Grip
    2 Pithing Needle
    2 Sulfur Elemental
    2 Pyroblast
    2 Rough
    2 Submerge

    I bring in 2 Submerge, 2 Pyro, 1 Loam
    Out 4 FoW 1 Daze. I'm thinking maybe Daze and a few forces stay in, and board out pierce instead?

    My buddy brings Library in, for the mirror. Which seems really good if you can resolve it.

  16. #1516
    Member

    Join Date

    Jun 2013
    Location

    Austin, TX
    Posts

    11

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaytron View Post
    What are your guys' SB plans in the RUG Delver mirror?

    My flex are 2 pierce, 2 forked bolt, 2 spell snare

    SB:
    1 Grafdigger
    1 Sylvan Library
    1 Life from the Loam
    1 Ancient Grudge
    1 Krosan Grip
    2 Pithing Needle
    2 Sulfur Elemental
    2 Pyroblast
    2 Rough
    2 Submerge

    I bring in 2 Submerge, 2 Pyro, 1 Loam
    Out 4 FoW 1 Daze. I'm thinking maybe Daze and a few forces stay in, and board out pierce instead?

    My buddy brings Library in, for the mirror. Which seems really good if you can resolve it.
    My plan:

    + 2 Submerge
    + 1 library
    + 2 pyro
    + 1 loam

    - 2 pierce
    - 4 fow

    with 2 snare, maybe take 1 out.

  17. #1517
    Member

    Join Date

    Oct 2014
    Location

    Rockland, NY
    Posts

    31

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Hey guys, I'm going to EE3 this weekend and it's the first time I'm playing Legacy since Eternal Weekend.

    What you guys would recommend running in the 6 flex spots for an unknown meta in this post-DTT world? I was previously running 3x Pierce, 2x Dismember and 1x Forked Bolt due to a heavy Infect and Grixis Delver local meta.

    SB plans are:

    2x Flusterstorm
    2x Submerge
    2x Rough/Tumble
    1x Pyroblast
    1x Red Elemental Blast
    1x Vendilion Clique
    1x Grafdigger's Cage
    1x Sulfur Elemental
    1x Sylvan Library
    1x Pithing Needle
    1x Krosan Grip
    1x Ancient Grudge

  18. #1518
    Member
    Jaytron's Avatar
    Join Date

    Aug 2015
    Location

    Norcal
    Posts

    238

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by Xerlic View Post
    Hey guys, I'm going to EE3 this weekend and it's the first time I'm playing Legacy since Eternal Weekend.

    What you guys would recommend running in the 6 flex spots for an unknown meta in this post-DTT world? I was previously running 3x Pierce, 2x Dismember and 1x Forked Bolt due to a heavy Infect and Grixis Delver local meta.

    SB plans are:

    2x Flusterstorm
    2x Submerge
    2x Rough/Tumble
    1x Pyroblast
    1x Red Elemental Blast
    1x Vendilion Clique
    1x Grafdigger's Cage
    1x Sulfur Elemental
    1x Sylvan Library
    1x Pithing Needle
    1x Krosan Grip
    1x Ancient Grudge
    With omnitell no longer having the presence it once had, I think 3 pierce main is too much. I'd do a 2/2/2 split with forked/dismember/pierce. I personally split between forked/pierce/snare.

  19. #1519
    Member

    Join Date

    Jun 2013
    Location

    Austin, TX
    Posts

    11

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by Xerlic View Post
    Hey guys, I'm going to EE3 this weekend and it's the first time I'm playing Legacy since Eternal Weekend.

    What you guys would recommend running in the 6 flex spots for an unknown meta in this post-DTT world? I was previously running 3x Pierce, 2x Dismember and 1x Forked Bolt due to a heavy Infect and Grixis Delver local meta.

    SB plans are:

    2x Flusterstorm
    2x Submerge
    2x Rough/Tumble
    1x Pyroblast
    1x Red Elemental Blast
    1x Vendilion Clique
    1x Grafdigger's Cage
    1x Sulfur Elemental
    1x Sylvan Library
    1x Pithing Needle
    1x Krosan Grip
    1x Ancient Grudge
    With: 2 fluster 2 pyro and 1 clique on sb.

    2 spell pierce, 1 snare, 2/1 dismember/ forked bolt

  20. #1520
    Member

    Join Date

    Oct 2014
    Location

    Rockland, NY
    Posts

    31

    Re: [Deck] Canadian Threshold (aka RUG Delver, Tempo Thresh)

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaytron View Post
    With omnitell no longer having the presence it once had, I think 3 pierce main is too much. I'd do a 2/2/2 split with forked/dismember/pierce. I personally split between forked/pierce/snare.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Crane View Post
    With: 2 fluster 2 pyro and 1 clique on sb.

    2 spell pierce, 1 snare, 2/1 dismember/ forked bolt
    Thanks for the advice. I agree that the 3 pierces are probably too much and will probably swap one to a snare.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)